Suchergebnisse

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia may need prolonged duration for the patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). METHODS: The Long-Term Hypothermia trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to examine the safety and efficacy in adults with sTBI. Eligible patients were 18–65, Glasgow Coma Scale score at 4 to 8, and initial intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥ 25 mm Hg, randomly assigned to the long-term mild hypothermia group (34–35 °C for 5 days) or normothermia group at 37 °C. The primary outcome was the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included ICP control, complications and laboratory findings, the length of ICU and hospital stay, and GOS at 6 months in patients with initial ICP ≥ 30 mm Hg. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01886222. FINDINGS: 302 patients were enrolled from June 25, 2013, to December 31, 2018, with 6 months follow-up in 14 hospitals, 156 in hypothermia group and 146 in normothermia group. There was no difference in favorable outcome (OR 1·55, 95%CI 0·91–2·64; P = 0·105) and in mortality (P = 0·111) between groups. In patients with an initial ICP ≥ 30 mm Hg, hypothermic treatment significantly increased favorable outcome over normothermia group (60·82%, 42·71%, respectively; OR 1·861, 95%CI 1·031–3·361; P = 0·039). Long-term mild hypothermia did not increase the incidences of complications. INTERPRETATION: Long-term mild hypothermia did not improve the neurological outcomes. However, it may be a potential option in sTBI patients with initial ICP ≥ 30 mm Hg. FUNDING: : Shanghai municipal government and Shanghai Jiao Tong University/School of Medicine.

Abstract: Background: The European Union (EU) aims to optimize patient protection and efficiency of health-care research by harmonizing procedures across Member States. Nonetheless, further improvements are required to increase multicenter research efficiency. We investigated IRB procedures in a large prospective European multicenter study on traumatic brain injury (TBI), aiming to inform and stimulate initiatives to improve efficiency. Methods: We reviewed relevant documents regarding IRB submission and IRB approval from European neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI). Documents included detailed information on IRB procedures and the duration from IRB submission until approval(s). They were translated and analyzed to determine the level of harmonization of IRB procedures within Europe. Results: From 18 countries, 66 centers provided the requested documents. The primary IRB review was conducted centrally (N = 11, 61%) or locally (N = 7, 39%) and primary IRB approval was obtained after one (N = 8, 44%), two (N = 6, 33%) or three (N = 4, 23%) review rounds with a median duration of respectively 50 and 98 days until primary IRB approval. Additional IRB approval was required in 55% of countries and could increase duration to 535 days. Total duration from submission until required IRB approval was obtained was 114 days (IQR 75–224) and appeared to be shorter after submission to local IRBs compared to central IRBs (50 vs. 138 days, p = 0.0074). Conclusion: We found variation in IRB procedures between and within European countries. There were differences in submission and approval requirements, number of review rounds and total duration. Research collaborations could benefit from the implementation of more uniform legislation and regulation while acknowledging local cultural habits and moral values between countries.