Suchergebnisse
Filter
74 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
The Influence of Directive Strategies on Settlement Duration
In: International negotiation: a journal of theory and practice, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 201-220
ISSN: 1571-8069
Are Directive Strategies in international disputes the most effective mediation method for obtaining durable peace? A standard statistical analysis shows no effect of Directive Strategies on settlement durability. This result however, is misleading, failing to take selection and indirect effects into account. In this article, I identify when selection and process effects reinforce or oppose each other. Directive Strategies have opposing negative selection and positive process effects, which can distort inferences about their influence. Strategies' direct and indirect effects are also examined. Directive Strategies are more likely to lead to Full Settlements – the most comprehensive form of agreement, which improve the settlement durability (an indirect effect). However, Directive Strategies are used in more intractable disputes that result in fragile settlements (a direct effect). A statistical analysis of international disputes that takes these conflicting dynamics into account demonstrates the efficacy of Directive Mediation Strategies in producing durable agreements.
The Influence of Directive Strategies on Settlement Duration
In: International negotiation: a journal of theory and practice, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 201-220
ISSN: 1382-340X
Are Directive Strategies in international disputes the most effective mediation method for obtaining durable peace? A standard statistical analysis shows no effect of Directive Strategies on settlement durability. This result however, is misleading, failing to take selection and indirect effects into account. In this article, I identify when selection and process effects reinforce or oppose each other. Directive Strategies have opposing negative selection and positive process effects, which can distort inferences about their influence. Strategies' direct and indirect effects are also examined. Directive Strategies are more likely to lead to Full Settlements -- the most comprehensive form of agreement, which improve the settlement durability (an indirect effect). However, Directive Strategies are used in more intractable disputes that result in fragile settlements (a direct effect). A statistical analysis of international disputes that takes these conflicting dynamics into account demonstrates the efficacy of Directive Mediation Strategies in producing durable agreements. Adapted from the source document.
All Mistakes Are Not Equal: Intelligence Errors and National Security
In: Intelligence and national security, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 634-654
ISSN: 1743-9019
Introduction. Symposium: Innovations in the study of mediation and peacemaking
In: Conflict management and peace science: the official journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 30, Heft 4, S. 349-353
ISSN: 1549-9219
All Mistakes Are Not Equal: Intelligence Errors and National Security
In: Intelligence and national security, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 634-654
ISSN: 0268-4527
Introduction. Symposium: Innovations in the study of mediation and peacemaking
In: Conflict management and peace science: CMPS ; journal of the Peace Science Society ; papers contributing to the scientific study of conflict and conflict analysis, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 349-353
ISSN: 0738-8942
On behalf of a grateful nation: conventionalized images of loss and individual opinion change in war
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 545-561
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
World Affairs Online
Signs of Trouble: Regional Organization Mediation and Civil War Agreement Durability
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 380-390
ISSN: 1468-2508
Signs of Trouble: Regional Organization Mediation and Civil War Agreement Durability
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 380-391
ISSN: 0022-3816
Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. By Christopher Gelpi, Peter D. Feaver, and Jason Reifler. (Princeton University Press, 2009.)
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 72, Heft 3, S. 910-911
ISSN: 1468-2508
Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 72, Heft 3, S. 910-911
ISSN: 0022-3816
Evaluating Claims of Social Connection to International Conflict Casualties
In: International interactions: empirical and theoretical research in international relations, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 352-364
ISSN: 1547-7444
RESEARCH NOTE: Evaluating Claims of Social Connection to International Conflict Casualties
In: International interactions: empirical and theoretical research in international relations, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 352-364
ISSN: 0305-0629
The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: an experimental approach
In: American political science review, Band 102, Heft 1, S. 95-106
ISSN: 0003-0554
World Affairs Online