Contemporary theories of liberalism: public reason as a post-Enlightenment project
In: SAGE politics texts
29 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: SAGE politics texts
In: Sage politics texts
In this text, Gerald F. Gaus provides students with a comprehensive overview of the key tenets of liberalism developed through Hobbes, Locke, Kant and Rawls to present day theories and debates.
In: Oxford political theory
In: Oxford Political Theory Ser
Drawing on current work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, this treatise develops a theory of personally justified belief. Building on this, it then advances an account of public justification that is more normative and less "populist" than the views of political liberals
In: Oxford political theory
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 2, Heft 2
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 354-355
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: History of political thought, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 343-345
ISSN: 0143-781X
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 59-91
ISSN: 1471-6437
Socialism, understood as the rejection of markets based on
private property in favor of comprehensive centralized economic
planning, is no longer a serious political option. If the core
of capitalism is the organization of the economy primarily through
market competition based on private property, then capitalism
has certainly defeated socialism. Markets have been
accepted—and central planning abandoned—throughout
most of the Third World and in most of the formerly Communist
states. In the advanced industrial states of the West, Labor
and "democratic socialist" parties have rejected
socialism, by deregulating markets and privatizing industries,
utilities, and transport. The U.K. Labour Party's 1945
manifesto declared the party to be a "Socialist Party,
and proud of it. Its ultimate aim is the establishment of the
Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain." Today the Labour
Party insists that markets are a given.
The 20th century did not witness a significant development in liberalism & liberal theory. Instead, liberal theory today is remarkably similar to the liberal theory of 100 years ago. The same conflicting principles that existed at the close of the 19th century -- such as individualism-collectivism, constructivism-anticonstructivism, value rationalism-skepticism -- are still present at the close of the 20th century. While innovative & complex thought has been introduced, the overall understanding of liberalism has remained static. This phenomenon does not necessary connote a weakness in liberal theory. However, both classical & contemporary viewpoints must be considered if liberalism is ever to become the prevailing political ideology. K. Larsen
In: Journal of political ideologies, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 179-199
ISSN: 1469-9613
In: Journal of political ideologies, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 179-199
ISSN: 1356-9317
At the close of the 20th century, liberalism has apparently vanquished its traditional rivals. However, whatever cause for celebration liberals might derive from their political victories over conservatives & socialists, in an important respect, the 20th century has been a disappointment for liberal theory. The same antinomies or tensions that marked it at the close of the 19th century characterize it today. In this essay, I show how disputes between liberal individualists & collectivists, & between rationalists & skeptics, have persisted throughout this century. I then examine several explanations for this apparent lack of progress in liberal theorizing. Adapted from the source document.
In: Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy and the social sciences, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 259-284
ISSN: 1502-3923