The Past if Past: The Use of Memories and Self-Healing Narratives in Refugees from the Former Yugoslavia
In: Journal of refugee studies, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 132-132
ISSN: 0951-6328
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of refugee studies, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 132-132
ISSN: 0951-6328
In: Journal of refugee studies, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 132-156
ISSN: 1471-6925
In: Emotion, space and society, Band 43, S. 100882
ISSN: 1755-4586
In: European psychologist, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 136-145
ISSN: 1878-531X
Abstract. Within traditional social, community, and clinical psychologies, the human rights framework has typically been interpreted and adopted from a person- or patient-based perspective. While useful and well meaning, ideological values concerning empowerment, agency, and resiliency have often framed human rights interventions or programs within psychology. We propose in this manuscript a theoretical shift for psychology to decentralize the role of the individual human being while at the same time avoiding forms of social behaviorism that tend to portray the person as passive or as reacting to external stimuli. Following this first shift from the individual to the collective, we suggest adopting anti-essentialist discourses about the parties, agents, and issues involved in human rights. To this goal, the philosophical framework of process or relational ontology may be especially useful. Based on critical theory, critical feminism, social constructionist, and post-human views of knowledge and reality, process ontology considers reality as complex, fluid, discursive, and dialogical. The separations between the personal and the political are questioned to underscore the entanglement and inseparability of dimensions of possibility and actions, which are continuous reconstructions. To conclude, we reflect on the ways in which these two movements toward anti-individualism and relational ontology might inform specific practices and reflections within human rights frameworks in psychology.
Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Contributors -- Acknowledgments -- Foreword -- Foreword -- Theoretical Introduction: Subjectivity, Reflexivity, and Affectivity as Research Processes -- Introduction -- Part I: Entanglements of Memories as Research -- 1 When we Migrate -- 2 My Poncho is a Flamenco Kimono -- 3 Wesearch:A Lao Research Scholar's Experience Learning about and with her Southeast Asian American Community -- 4 The Process of Becoming: An Intimate and Retrospective Look at a 30-year Journey of Searching for a Home -- 5 Looking for Home: Reflections on an Artistic Process -- Part II: Negotiating Belonging and Identities in Research -- 6 On not Seeing Oneself in the Migration Scholarship: Race and the Struggle for Belonging in the Indian Diaspora -- 7 In-between Places: Negotiating (Dis)advantage Across National Contexts -- 8 Going from Student to Immigrant to Citizen -- 9 Migration, Narratives, and Languages: Between Life and Work -- 10 Being a Transnational Language Teacher Educator and Researcher: Borderlands, Ideologies, and Liminal Identities -- 11 A Transatlantic Teacher Educator: My Life and Career Across two Countries and Languages -- 12 The Research Memoir of an Intra-EU Migrant who has become a Guest in a Settler Colonial State -- Part III: Tensions of Power in Knowledge Production -- 13 Bewilderment and Illumination: Language as a Tool to Understand the Migrant Experience -- 14 Developing New Approaches, Stepping Beyond Categories: Transnationalism and Youth Mobility Trajectories in Migration Research -- 15 From the "Field" to the Stage: A Migration Story -- 16 Can Black Girls be Transnational? -- 17 From "Second-Generation Immigrant" to Sociologist of Migration -- 18 Keeping the Struggle Alive: A Methodologically Disobedient Essay.
In: Journal of family theory & review: JFTR
ISSN: 1756-2589
AbstractWhat psychosocial impacts does migrating without children have on parents? How do the reconfigurations of gendered dynamics in transnational families (TFs) affect the well‐being and subjectivities of mothers and fathers in the hosting and sending communities? Through this literature meta‐synthesis, we describe six main areas of concern for parents who migrate without their children: (a) migration and family roles; (b) affects; (c) negotiations of gender, subjectivity, and family expectations; (d) family cohesion, tensions, and arrangements; (e) communication and the digital relational space; and (f) narratives on family reunification. We discuss the ways in which these areas and processes interact with each other within and around TFs. This article contributes to theories on family transnationality and transnational parenting by identifying and discussing specific dynamics of change and possibilities of becoming, which will be helpful to professionals working with TFs and to migrant parents to understand and anticipate likely family challenges.
In: Revista de Estudios Sociales, Heft 88, S. 59-78
ISSN: 1900-5180
This article delves into the processes of signification regarding resilience among adolescents who have traversed the Chilean child welfare and juvenile justice systems, as it plays a pivotal role in identifying factors conducive to adaptation and social integration. Drawing from qualitative research grounded in a phenomenological approach, the study analyzed six in-depth, semi-structured interviews with adolescents who have interacted with both systems. Findings underscore that personal resilience in adolescents is closely tied to their self-perception and learning experiences aimed at developing social skills and emotional regulation. Additionally, social and institutional resilience is marked by adolescents' perceptions of enhancements in their quality of life and their ability to adapt socially. They emphasize the importance of establishing solid, trustworthy, and enduring relationships with counselors and educators, alongside highlighting the supportive role of intervention institutions in fostering personal, relational growth, and in shaping a proactive and adaptive life trajectory. These outcomes underscore the need to integrate resilience processes into the design of interventions targeting vulnerable children and adolescents caught in situations of legal transgression, advocating for their incorporation into public policies addressing childhood and adolescent vulnerability.
Die Wichtigkeit aktueller Trends in Technologie, Digitalisierung und Massenmedien für die globale Kultur führt zu Fragen nach der Verantwortlichkeit und Ethik forscherischer Entscheidungen in den Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften. Eingebettet in die jeweils dominanten Paradigmen affizieren diese Trends subtil unsere Weltsicht, unsere Werte und den Charakter sozio-politischer Diskurse. In diesen kritischen post-normalen Zeiten (SARDAR 2009) werden radikale Imagination (HAIVEN & KHASNABISH 2014) und epistemischer Aktivismus, verbunden mit nicht-dominanten Weisen der Wissensproduktion, zu einer Notwendigkeit. Kunstbasierte Forschung (KBF) beinhaltet onto-epistemologische Perspektiven und Methodologien, die erforderlich sind, um die gegenwärtigen unilateralen und hegemonialen Paradigmen herauszufordern und zu stören, die den überkommenen gesellschaftlichen und geo-politischen Konstrukten unterliegen. In diesem Beitrag vertreten wir die Etablierung eines globalen Netzwerks von KBF-Wissenschaftler*innen und Stakeholdern und die Nutzung einer radikal-imaginativen Philosophie und von kunstbasierten Verfahren als Ausgangspunkte für sozialen Aktivismus und einen epistemologischen Wechsel. ; The impact of current trends in technology, digitalization and mass media on our global culture raises questions regarding the responsibility and ethics of research decisions in contemporary social and health sciences. Embedded in the dominant paradigms, these trends subtly affect our worldviews, our valuation of the human condition, and the nature of socio-political discourse. In such critical post normal times (SARDAR, 2009) radical imagination (HAIVEN & KHASNABISH, 2014) and epistemic activism, embracing non-dominant modes of knowledge production in the social and health sciences, becomes a necessity. Arts-based research (ABR) is resonant with the onto-epistemological perspectives and methodologies necessary to challenge and disrupt current unilateral and hegemonic paradigms underlying decaying societal and geo-political ...
BASE
In: Forum qualitative Sozialforschung: FQS = Forum: qualitative social research, Band 21, Heft 2
ISSN: 1438-5627
The impact of current trends in technology, digitalization and mass media on our global culture raises questions regarding the responsibility and ethics of research decisions in contemporary social and health sciences. Embedded in the dominant paradigms, these trends subtly affect our worldviews, our valuation of the human condition, and the nature of socio-political discourse. In such critical post normal times (SARDAR, 2009) radical imagination (HAIVEN & KHASNABISH, 2014) and epistemic activism, embracing non-dominant modes of knowledge production in the social and health sciences, becomes a necessity. Arts-based research (ABR) is resonant with the onto-epistemological perspectives and methodologies necessary to challenge and disrupt current unilateral and hegemonic paradigms underlying decaying societal and geo-political constructs. In this article, we advocate for the development of a global network of ABR scholars and stakeholders invoking a radical imaginative philosophy and arts-based research methodologies as an approach to social activism and epistemological change.
In: International review of qualitative research: IRQR, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 491-513
ISSN: 1940-8455
In this paper, we take issue with the supposed superiority of specific epistemologies, methodologies, and research practices, as well as the neocolonialist practices of discovery, development and interpretation of evidence. Furthermore, we illustrate how the colonization of evidence is enacted through discourses of domination, subjectivication, and civilization. We maintain that these practices and discourses intend to establish more unified, narrow, and easily controlled fields of science. In reaction, we argue that the dismantling of systems of domination and hegemony may result from the scientists' commitment to cross the political and methodological boundaries of their practice. Evidence is not about a particular type of data or knowledge, but about how researchers consciously and responsibly operate in various epistemological, methodological, and empirical spaces. Thus, evidence cannot be defined; it can only be described within specific cultural and epistemological contexts.