La posizione costituzionale dell'opposizione
In: Pubblicazioni dell'Istituto di Diritto Pubblico 44
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Pubblicazioni dell'Istituto di Diritto Pubblico 44
In: Il politico: rivista italiana di scienze politiche ; rivista quardrimestrale, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 25-74
ISSN: 0032-325X
In: Vienna online journal on international constitutional law: ICL-Journal, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 479-506
ISSN: 1995-5855, 2306-3734
Abstract
Europe can be considered a sort of fortress of the protection of socio-economic rights. However, this bright scenario has been unsettled by the eruption of the Eurozone crisis, which has challenged the narrative of social Europe and swept away protections for social rights in Member States grappling with sovereign debt crises such as Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus, Latvia and Romania. In these countries, austerity measures led to persistent violations of social rights, under the external constraint of conditionality regimes which involved cuts in wages, pensions and welfare services. Consequently, austerity measures were challenged in domestic and European Courts and before the ECSR. In other words, there has been a 'turn to the law', in order to give concrete effect to the potential offered by the relevant legal instruments. What has been the general attitude of the Courts and quasi-judicial bodies to actions challenging austerity measures? Since the analysis of how the Courts and other human rights bodies manage the complex and controversial balance between austerity and social rights is an excellent 'stress test' to determine the 'weight' of the latter not only in the political debate, but also in the human rights discourse, this paper will focus on the 'crisis cases' in Europe, so as to shed light on the actual level of protection for social rights.
In: Perspectives on Federalism, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 34-67
ISSN: 2036-5438
Abstract
International and constitutional law, originally distinct realms with limited areas of intersection, are getting closer and closer, particularly in the European landscape within the human rights protection field, where these mere contacts between the two systems have become intersections and overlaps. The present article will try to shed light on the still unsolved and problematic issues to which overlapping human rights protection systems give rise, by focusing on an analysis of the heterologous in vitro fertilization case, where both the Strasbourg Court and the Italian Constitutional Court delivered relevant judgments on very similar matters (ECtHR's S.H. Judgment; Judgment No. 162/2014 from the Italian CC). Such analysis revealed useful in highlighting connections and disconnections between the different levels of protection of rights, and led us to argue that the development of a multilevel protection of rights is also, at least partially, a tale of Courts, each competing to have the last word on human rights adjudication.