Suchergebnisse

Andrew Jordan's (2001b) multifaceted critique of the notion of multi-level governance as it applies to the European Union is examined. Problems with the following four critiques are identified: multi-level governance is simply the combination of existing theories of intergovernmental & supranational relations; the notion provides an adequate description of the European Union but fails to present a theoretical account for integration processes; the autonomy of subnational authorities within multi-level governance systems is exaggerated; & the establishment of a multi-level governance system engenders a top-down understanding of subnational authorities. Nevertheless, it is stressed that three of Jordan's criticisms highlight the current shortcomings with multi-level governance in the contemporary European Union context; for example, it is conceded that multi-level governance indeed emphasizes subnational authorities at the expense of other actors. J. W. Parker