Fighting Corruption in Paraguay and Chile: Exploring the Local Embedding of the International Anti-Corruption Discourse from a Post-Development Perspective
In: Entwicklungstheorie und Entwicklungspolitik v.18
Cover -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Post-development -- 2.1 Critiques of development -- 2.2. A sceptical post-development stance -- 2.3 Local embedding of international discourse -- 3 The international and transnational anti-corruption campaign (INTACD) -- 3.1 Conceptions of corruption based on modernisation theory -- 3.2 Rational-legal authority and the public-private divide -- 3.3 Economic conceptualisation of corruption -- 3.4 Critiques of the INTACD -- 3.4.1 INTACD-compatible critiques -- 3.4.2 Fundamentally contesting critiques of the INTACD -- 4 Research gaps, case study selection and methods -- 4.1 Combining Post-development and critical anti-corruption studies and resulting research gaps -- 4.2 Contrasting cases: Paraguay and Chile -- 4.3 Methods: discourse analysis and constructionist expert interviews -- 4.3.1 Argumentative discourse analysis -- 4.3.2 Constructionist expert interviews -- 4.3.3 Delimitation of the discourse -- 5 Anti-corruption narratives in Paraguay -- 5.1 The economic narrative -- 5.2 The 'orekuete' narrative -- 5.3 Historical path dependency (HPD): corruption as a legacy of the Stroessner regime -- 5.4 Interim conclusion -- 6 Anti-corruption narratives in Chile -- 6.1 Chile as a success case and an example in Latin America -- 6.2 Subnarratives: centre-left and right wing -- 6.3 The contesting narrative -- 6.4 Interim conclusion -- 7 Two ways of emancipation through local translations of international discourse -- 8 The anti-corruption discourse and the concept of social capital -- 8.1 Corruption as a social relationship and the division between micro- and macro-moral -- 8.2 The INTACD and its conceptualisation of personal social relations -- 8.3 Personal social relations in the concept of social capital -- 8.4 Discretion, reinforced anti-statism and a paternalist development discourse