Suchergebnisse

Sobre la base de un análisis sociológico, a escala global se destaca un número cada vez mayor de sujetos sometidos a dinámicas de explotación tan fuertes como para estar privados completamente del goce y del ejercicio de derechos fundamentales. En particular, respecto del tema del tráfico de órganos, se registran prácticas de desigualdad radicalizadas en las bolsas de pobreza generadas por los conflictos bélicos, por equilibrios políticos precarios y por legislaciones migratorias restrictivas. El ensayo analiza estas problemáticas partiendo del tema de la trata de seres humanos con la finalidad de trasplantar órganos, hasta llegar a la más amplia cuestión de la comercialidad del cuerpo humano y de la legalización del mercado. ; From a perspective of sociological analysis it is possible to highlight on a global scale the growing number of human beings subjected to dynamics of exploitation so severe that they are completely deprived of the enjoyment and exercise of their fundamental rights. Regarding the issue of organ trafficking in particular, there are radicalized inequality practices in the pockets of poverty generated by armed conflicts, by precarious political balances and by restrictive immigration laws. This essay deals with these problems that starting from the trafficking of human beings with the purpose of transplanting organs aims to analyze the broader issue of the commerciality of the human body and the legalization of the market.

¿Es posible pensar en un léxico de los derechos a través de un imaginario jurídico que quiere alejarse de la herencia moderna? Este artículo se ocupa del tema de los conflictos jurídicos que proceden del pluralismo moral, en el ámbito del debate entre secularismo y postsecularismo. Partiendo de la revalorización del espacio de la política, la autora vuelve a interpretar algunas perspectivas elaboradas por la teoría general del derecho, que captan la raíz pluralista de las prácticas sociales. ; It is possible talk about rights in a legal imagination, that wants to separate itself from modern heritage? This paper discusses the legal conflicts that arise from moral pluralism in the debate on secularism and post-secularism. Moving from the revaluation of the space of politics, the author rethinks some perspectives of general theory of law, that capture the pluralistic root of social practices.

It is possible talk about rights in a legal imagination, that wants to separate itself from modern heritage? This paper discusses the legal conflicts that arise from moral pluralism in the debate on secularism and post-secularism. Moving from the revaluation of the space of politics, the author rethinks some perspectives of general theory of law, that capture the pluralistic root of social practices. ; ¿Es posible pensar en un léxico de los derechos a través de un imaginario jurídico que quiere alejarse de la herencia moderna? Este artículo se ocupa del tema de los conflictos jurídicos que proceden del pluralismo moral, en el ámbito del debate entre secularismo y postsecularismo. Partiendo de la revalorización del espacio de la política, la autora vuelve a interpretar algunas perspectivas elaboradas por la teoría general del derecho, que captan la raíz pluralista de las prácticas sociales.

The words of modern narrators help bring to surface the contradictions and conflicts typical of the metropolis, transforming it into a sort of cultural instrument that reads the different languages, images and forms of life that it is defined by. The crisis of perception of space and time, the difficulty of using a language that is able to give meaning, the shattering of personal identity, all make it hard to accumulate experiences and transform them into stories to pass on. The only way to start a relationship with the other and with the world is, as Charles Baudelaire and Walter Benjamin state, the moment of choc, the moment lived and that cannot be transmitted. The urgency is to not become a prisoner of the nostalgia for the past, but to make the irreparable oppositions that affect the metropolis productive.

COVER; quartino; INDICE; Premessa; HANS KELSEN'S GOD AND THE STATE: THE THEORY OF POSITIVE LAW AS METHODOLOGICAL ANARCHISM; "UGUAGLIANZA": QUANTIFICATORE UNIVERSALE?; DWORKIN, COLEMAN E L'IDEA DI "CONVENZIONE"; 'TO RESTORE A COMPLEX UNITY ... RICOEUR WITH AND BEYOND DWORKIN'; LEGAL SHAPES AND EFFECTIVENESS; BIBLIOGRAFIA