Suchergebnisse

Effective stakeholder engagement is essential if PRO-Ethics is to have lasting, sustainable impact. PRO-Ethics needs to draw on the expertise of organisations outside the consortium in order to develop a robust ethics framework and practical, usable guidelines for assessing the ethics of participation processes in innovation processes. Its wider impact also depends on results being taken up and used by organisations beyond the consortium. Work Package 4 is designed to ensure that key stakeholders are meaningfully involved in PRO-Ethics from an early stage and throughout the project. Task 4.3, dialogue with ethics committees and research integrity (RI) bodies, is designed to facilitate this process. This document describes the results of PRO-Ethics' initial steps to engage this key set of stakeholders. It presents findings from a set of interviews and a workshop conducted between July and September 2020. These activities engaged important stakeholder organisations for PRO-Ethics at both the national and regional levels, including the European Network of Research Integrity Offices (ENRIO), the European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities (ALLEA), and the European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC, a PRO-Ethics partner), as well as academic institutions. DISCLAIMER: The present Deliverable has been submitted to the European Commission for review. The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Cover -- Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Illustrations -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- 1 An Introduction to Inclusive Innovation -- Defining Inclusive Innovation -- A Brief History of Inclusive Innovation in Southeast Asia -- Inclusion of Whom? Agency, Contingencies, and Problem-Ownership -- People and Planet: Ecological Integration -- Our Inclusive Innovation Framework -- Data and Methods -- How the Book Is Organized -- Notes -- 2 How: Innovation By and for Problem-Owners -- How Can Social Capital Boost Inclusion? -- How Can Design Principles Encourage Inclusion? -- How Can Grassroots Innovation Propel Inclusive Innovation? -- How Can Social Innovation Support Inclusive Innovation? -- How Can Systems Innovation Foster Inclusive Innovation? -- How Can Social and Systems Entrepreneurship Drive Inclusive Innovation? -- Who Is Involved in this Approach, and How? -- Strengths and Shortcomings -- Notes -- 3 What: Innovation for Environmental and Social Good -- What Are Technologies for Environmental and Social Good? -- What Are Appropriate Technologies? -- What Technological Advance Can Displace Labor? -- What Technologies Can Bring Jobs? -- Who Is Involved in this Approach, and How? -- Strengths and Shortcomings -- Notes -- 4 Where: Innovation Everywhere -- Where: the Role of Place in Innovation -- Where Does Innovation Happen Across Southeast Asia? -- Where Is Exclusion Happening? -- Where Do Policies Strive for Spatially Inclusive Innovation? -- Where Has COVID-19 Acted as a Critical Juncture? -- Who Is Involved in this Approach, and How? -- Strengths and Shortcomings -- Notes -- 5 The Future of Inclusive Innovation -- Revisiting the Concept of Inclusive Innovation -- 1. Production Versus Consumption Orientation.

2016 blows other recent years out of the water for political, economic, social and environmental turbulence. Amid an apparently bleak landscape of rising nationalism, a refugee crisis, continued war and terrorism, and the warmest year on record, can any of our leading commentators see a glimmer of light ahead?