Suchergebnisse
Filter
33 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
The Use of Administrative Discretion in Implementing the State Children's Health Insurance Program
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 35-35
ISSN: 0048-5950
BOOK REVIEWS
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 159-159
ISSN: 0048-5950
Welfare Policy Making in the States: The Devil in DevolutionWelfare Policy Making in the States: The Devil in Devolution. By Pamela Winston. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002. Pp. ix, 352. $59.95 cloth, $24.95 paper.)
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 310-311
ISSN: 1468-2508
Welfare Policy Making in the States: The Devil in Devolution
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 66, Heft 1, S. 310-311
ISSN: 0022-3816
THE USE OF ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION IN IMPLEMENTING THE STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 35-52
ISSN: 0048-5950
STATES HAVE EXERCISED ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION IN AT LEAST SIX DIFFERENT WAYS DURING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM (CHIP) PROVISION OF THE BALANCED BUDGET ACT OF 1997. STATES HAVE USED THIS FLEXIBILITY TO DETERMINE WHEN TO SUBMIT THEIR PLANS AND WHEN TO PUT THE CHIP PROGRAM INTO EFFECT. AFTER DESCRIBING THE PROBLEM OF UNINSURED CHILDREN IN AMERICA AND THE POLITICS OF PROGRAM ADOPTION, MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IS USED TO ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHY HAVE SOME STATES MOVED MORE QUICKLY THAN OTHERS TO GET PLANS FOR INTRODUCING CHIP SUBMITTED, APPROVED, AND IMPLEMENTED? THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A STATE'S ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND HEALTH-NEED CHARACTERISTICS, ON THE ONE HAND, AND THE TIMING OF SUBMISSION AND IMPLEMENTATION, ON THE OTHER, ARE EXAMINED.
Articles - The Use of Administrative Discretion in Implementing the State Children's Health Insurance Program
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 35-52
ISSN: 0048-5950
Understanding the New Politics of Abortion
In: Political studies, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 174
ISSN: 0032-3217
Understanding the New Politics of Abortion: A Framework and Agenda for Research
In: American politics quarterly, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 4
ISSN: 0044-7803
Understanding the New Politics of Abortion: A Framework and Agenda for Research
In: American politics quarterly, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 4-30
ISSN: 1532-673X
A conservative majority on the Supreme Court, recent Supreme Court decisions such as Webster v. Reproductive Health Services and Hodgson v. Minnesota that give states more leeway to set abortion standards, actions by state legislatures and governors to pass new, tougher state antiabortion laws, as well as efforts by the Reagan and Bush administrations to prevent workers at federally funded family planning clinics from discussing with clients the availability of abortion services point to a new political climate surrounding the abortion issue. These recent developments also increase the chances that Roe v. Wade will be overturned in the future. This essay defines the parameters of a "new" politics of abortion, offers a framework for understanding this post- Webster abortion politics, and suggests an agenda for future research. The argument advanced here is that the politics of abortion can best be understood by examining the nature and scope of the conflict over abortion and the institutional context within which that conflict takes place.
Local Health Policy in Action: The Municipal Health Services Program. By Eli Ginzberg, Edith M. Davis, and Miriam Ostow (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985. xiv, 136p. $28.50)
In: American political science review, Band 82, Heft 2, S. 638-639
ISSN: 1537-5943
The "Too Few Cases/Too Many Variables" Problem in Implementation Research
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 328-347
ISSN: 1938-274X
Threats to Freedom from a Tyranny of the Minority
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 68-75
ISSN: 1471-5457
The Life Sciences and the Public: Is Science Too Important to Be Left to the Scientists?
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 28-40
ISSN: 1471-5457
The scientific community is divided over the question of who should govern science. Most scientists are comfortable with a governing scheme which leaves science in the hands of scientists. Dissident scientists, with support from active members of the lay public, believe that science is too important to be left to scientists (Policy Research Incorporated, 1977; Miller, Prewitt, and Pearson, 1980).