Suchergebnisse
Filter
61 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
What Resolution 242 Really Said
In: American foreign policy interests, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 41-46
ISSN: 1533-2128
What Resolution 242 really said
In: American foreign policy interests: journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, Inc, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 41-46
ISSN: 1080-3920
World Affairs Online
Resolution 242 after Twenty Years
In: American Foreign Policy Newsletter, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 1-6
A Reply
In: American Foreign Policy Newsletter, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 1-11
The Madrid CSCE Conference—'Twas a Hollow Victory
In: American Foreign Policy Newsletter, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 1-5
The Helsinki Final Act Revisited
In: American Foreign Policy Newsletter, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 1-6
The Helsinki final act and the Madrid review conference: A case study of political non‐communication
In: Political Communication, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-19
ISSN: 1091-7675
The Helsinki Final Act and the Madrid review conference: a case study of political non-communication
In: Political communication and persuasion: an international journal, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-19
ISSN: 0195-7473
The Importance of Private Negotiations
In: Paths to Peace, S. 117-119
Human Rights and the Belgrade Meeting
In September of 1977, President Carter asked me to take on responsibility for what is familiarly called CSCE--the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Like most Americans, I had previously thought of the CSCE in terms of the Helsinki Summit of 1975 when President Ford signed the document called the Final Act, a lengthy text, not a treaty, but an expression at the highest political level of the commitment of the 35 states of Europe and North America to respect certain principles of interstate behavior, to respect human rights, to build mutual confidence in the military sphere, and to cooperate in economic, humanitarian, informational, cultural and educational fields. Many in the West were understandably cynical about the practical meaning of the inclusion in the Final Act of the principle of "respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief." By the formation of groups to monitor their own governments' performance, however, citizens of the Soviet Union, of Czechoslovakia, of Poland, Bulgaria, and other countries in the East showed that they took seriously this pledge and also the commitments to a freer flow of people and ideas that were embodied in the humanitarian provisions of what is called Basket Three of the Final Act. That the Belgrade conference would not pass quietly as just another routine diplomatic gathering was assured by the events in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, including the arrest and the imprisonment of members of the monitoring groups and other ethnic, racial, religious and political "dissidents".
BASE
Belgrade review meeting concludes
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 78, Heft 2013, S. 40-44
ISSN: 0041-7610
Aus US-amerikanischer Sicht + Offizieller Standpunkt von Staaten/Staatengruppen
World Affairs Online
Review meeting of the CSCE opens at Belgrade
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 77, Heft 2003, S. 674-679
ISSN: 0041-7610
World Affairs Online
Review meeting of the CSCE opens at Belgrade [statement at the opening plenary session, Oct. 6, 1977]
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 77, S. 674-679
ISSN: 0041-7610