Suchergebnisse
Filter
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Ausländerfeindlichkeit unter Jugendlichen in Leipzig
In: Stadtforschung und Statistik : Zeitschrift des Verbandes Deutscher Städtestatistiker, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 64-71
In kommunalen Umfragen erhobene Einstellungen gegenüber Ausländern repräsentieren ein Bild gelebter Toleranz. Selten werden Jugendliche zu ihren ausländerbezogenen Einstellungen gefragt und mit altersspezifischen Faktoren in Verbindung gesetzt. Dieser Beitrag bezieht sich auf theoretische Ansätze der Anomietheorie, der Sozialisations- und Deprivationsforschung, um Kompensationsprozesse und Konfliktpotenziale als Wirkungsmechanismen für Ausländerfeindlichkeit unter Leipziger Jugendlichen zu untersuchen. Sozialisations- und Deprivationsansätze bestätigen sich teilweise, da multiple altersspezifische Probleme und über den Schultyp indizierte Konflikte um Ausbildungs- und Arbeitsmarktchancen mit erhöhter Ausländerfeindlichkeit einhergehen.
Género en la informalidad: historias laborales centroamericanas
"Offers series of 'testimonials' from five of the six countries of Spanish Central America (not El Salvador). Additionally, provides the theoretical, historical, and methodological background for the testimonials that follow, and attempts to analyze narratives in a theoretically nuanced way, focusing on the subtle and not-so-subtle links between gender identity, household relations, and work experiences in the informal sector"--Handbook of Latin American Studies, v. 57
Goal Instructions, Response Format, and Idea Generation in Groups
In: Small group research: an international journal of theory, investigation, and application, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 227-256
ISSN: 1552-8278
This study examined the separate and joint impact of two standard, but seemingly conflicting brainstorming rules on idea generation in interacting and nominal groups: the free-wheeeling rule, which calls for the production of dissimilar ideas, and the build-on rule, which encourages idea combination and improvement. We also tested whether the superior performance of interacting groups found in several previous studies using a brainwriting technique may have been due to the different response formats employed by groups and individuals. Interacting groups and individuals generated ideas for improving their university under one of three sets of instructions. In one condition, participants were given the build-on rule, but not the free-wheeling rule, and in another condition, the reverse was true. In the third condition, both rules were provided. When the two rules were presented separately, interacting and nominal groups responded similarly, generating ideas from more semantic categories in response to the free-wheeling rule, and generating more practical ideas in response to the build-on rule. But when those rules were presented simultaneously, interacting groups generated ideas from fewer semantic categories than did nominal groups. In addition, interacting groups produced more ideas overall than nominal groups, but only when the two used different response formats.