A Critique of Neoclassical Macroeconomics
In: History of political economy, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 260-263
ISSN: 1527-1919
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: History of political economy, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 260-263
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: Education and urban society, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 185-195
ISSN: 1552-3535
In: Journal of post-Keynesian economics, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 55-71
ISSN: 1557-7821
In: The journal of human resources, Band XLII, Heft 4, S. 701-738
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: American economic review, Band 96, Heft 2, S. 242-245
ISSN: 1944-7981
In: The review of black political economy: analyzing policy prescriptions designed to reduce inequalities, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 9-21
ISSN: 1936-4814
In: Journal of economics, race, and policy, Band 1, Heft 2-3, S. 75-91
ISSN: 2520-842X
In: The review of black political economy: analyzing policy prescriptions designed to reduce inequalities, Band 42, Heft 1-2, S. 155-177
ISSN: 1936-4814
The purpose of this paper is to formally evaluate whether the deleterious impact of unemployment on mental health increases as skin shade darkens for black women in the U.S. Using data drawn from the National Survey of American Life, we find strong evidence of a gradient on depression between skin shade and unemployment for black women. These findings are consistent with the premises of the emerging field of stratification economics. Moreover, the findings are robust to various definitions of skin shade. Unemployed black women with darker complexions are significantly more likely to suffer their first onset of depression than unemployed black females with lighter skin shade. While in some cases, lighter skinned black women appeared not to suffer adverse effects of unemployment compared to their employed counterparts, persons with dark complexions did not enjoy the same degree of protection from poor mental health.
In: Social science quarterly, Band 95, Heft 2, S. 563-580
ISSN: 1540-6237
This article offers new evidence on whether stalking damages the mental health of female victims. This study advances the literature by accounting for age of initial stalking victimization, mental health status prior to being stalked, and exposure to other forms of traumatic victimization. Using logistical analysis, we utilize data drawn from three large national data sets. We find that being the victim of stalking as a young adult, ages 18-45, significantly increases the odds of initial onset of psychological distress; however, this is not the case for victims ages 12-17. Stalking has emerged as a deeply disturbing public issue because of its prevalence and the fear it creates in victims. Unfortunately, little is known about the psychological consequences of being stalked because the emerging literature typically is based on small, nonrandom samples. Our findings highlight the benefits of reducing stalking and the importance of supporting victims. Adapted from the source document.
In: Social science quarterly, Band 95, Heft 2, S. 563-580
ISSN: 1540-6237
ObjectivesThis article offers new evidence on whether stalking damages the mental health of female victims. This study advances the literature by accounting for age of initial stalking victimization, mental health status prior to being stalked, and exposure to other forms of traumatic victimization.MethodsUsing logistical analysis, we utilize data drawn from three large national data sets.ResultsWe find that being the victim of stalking as a young adult, ages 18–45, significantly increases the odds of initial onset of psychological distress; however, this is not the case for victims ages 12–17.ConclusionsStalking has emerged as a deeply disturbing public issue because of its prevalence and the fear it creates in victims. Unfortunately, little is known about the psychological consequences of being stalked because the emerging literature typically is based on small, nonrandom samples. Our findings highlight the benefits of reducing stalking and the importance of supporting victims.