Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
23 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American political science review, Band 79, Heft 1, S. 261-262
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 77, Heft 4, S. 1129-1130
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 77, Heft 1, S. 272-273
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Review of radical political economics, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 80-82
ISSN: 1552-8502
In: IRB: ethics & human research, Band 3, Heft 8, S. 5
ISSN: 2326-2222
In: Routledge Library Editions: Journalism v.8
Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Original Title Page -- Original Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Series Editor's Introduction -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: First Person, Past Tense -- Part I: The Music -- Chapter 1: Gear -- Chapter 2: Shango Mick Arrives -- Chapter 3: Next Year in San Francisco -- Chapter 4: Harlequin in Neon -- Chapter 5: The Lizard King -- Chapter 6: More Mysterioso -- Chapter 7: Mover -- Chapter 8: San Francisco Bray -- Chapter 9: Bell-Bottom Blue Jeans -- Chapter 10: Je Fais Comme Je Veux -- Chapter 11: Ravi and the Teenie Satori -- Chapter 12: Giraffe Hunters -- Part II: The Mystique -- Chapter 13: The Psychedelic Psell -- Chapter 14: Maharishi Meets the Press -- Chapter 15: A Quiet Evening at the Balloon Farm -- Chapter 16: Catcher in the Haight -- Chapter 17: The Insulated Hippie Awakens -- Chapter 18: The Long Hot Summer on Blue Jay Way -- Chapter 19: The Head Freak Awaits a New Son -- Chapter 20: A Groovy Idea While He Lasted -- Part III: The Madness -- Chapter 21: Theater of Cruelty: King in Chicago -- Chapter 22: Theater of the Absurd: Insurrection at Columbia -- Chapter 23: Theater of Fear: One on the Aisle -- Chapter 24: Homecoming -- Chapter 25: C. J. Fish on Saturday -- Chapter 26: Love and Money and the Shoot-out in Marin -- Chapter 27: That Good Night -- A Note on the Text -- Index.
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, S. 101-103
ISSN: 0012-3846
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 480-483
ISSN: 1541-0072
In: Policy studies journal: an international journal of public policy, Band 10, S. 480-591
ISSN: 0190-292X
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, S. 109
ISSN: 0012-3846
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 202-203
ISSN: 1537-5935
In the Fall 1979 issue ofPS, Ithiel Pool presented an analysis of the recently-proposed HEW regulations on the protection of human subjects of behavioral and biomedical research. He expressed three major criticisms of the proposals. The first is that the draft regulations "extend federal authority … to policing some practices in private research which should in a free society be guided by private research which should in a free society be guided by private and professional decisions." Second, he objects to the proposal that Institutional Review Boards (hereinafter "IRB's") should determine that "the research methods are appropriate to the objectives of the research and the field of study." Finally, he argues that the proposed regulations are an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech.We have serious reservations about all three of Pool's arguments, most particularly the third. We are concerned that the issues raised be seriously considered and widely discussed in the profession, especially given the quasi-official way in which Pool's statement was presented inPS(see the Editor's Note, p. 452) as well as the fact that it was announced in December 1979 (inIRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research) that a committee of social scientists headed by Pool has "challenged the constitutionality of the DHEW proposed regulations." (The article listed such notables as Gabriel Almond, George Homans and Charles Lindblom as "among the more than forty prospective members of the Committee," p. 7).
In: PS, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 202-203
ISSN: 2325-7172
In the Fall 1979 issue of PS, Ithiel Pool presented an analysis of the recently-proposed HEW regulations on the protection of human subjects of behavioral and biomedical research. He expressed three major criticisms of the proposals. The first is that the draft regulations "extend federal authority … to policing some practices in private research which should in a free society be guided by private research which should in a free society be guided by private and professional decisions." Second, he objects to the proposal that Institutional Review Boards (hereinafter "IRB's") should determine that "the research methods are appropriate to the objectives of the research and the field of study." Finally, he argues that the proposed regulations are an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech.We have serious reservations about all three of Pool's arguments, most particularly the third. We are concerned that the issues raised be seriously considered and widely discussed in the profession, especially given the quasi-official way in which Pool's statement was presented in PS (see the Editor's Note, p. 452) as well as the fact that it was announced in December 1979 (in IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research) that a committee of social scientists headed by Pool has "challenged the constitutionality of the DHEW proposed regulations." (The article listed such notables as Gabriel Almond, George Homans and Charles Lindblom as "among the more than forty prospective members of the Committee," p. 7).