Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy
In: Protecting Human Rights, S. 263-280
32 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Protecting Human Rights, S. 263-280
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 221-228
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 78-141
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 142-158
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 9-21
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 22-50
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 51-77
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 236-280
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 229-235
In: The Sovereignty of Parliament, S. 159-220
In: Cambridge studies in constitutional law
"This book has four main themes: (1) a criticism of 'common law constitutionalism', the theory that Parliament's authority is conferred by, and therefore is or can be made subordinate to judge-made common law; (2) an analysis of Parliament's ability to abdicate, limit or regulate the exercise of its own authority, including a revision of Dicey's conception of sovereignty, a repudiation of the doctrine of implied repeal and the proposal of a novel theory of 'manner and form' requirements for law-making; (3) an examination of the relationship between parliamentary sovereignty and statutory interpretation, defending the reality of legislative intentions, and their indispensability to sensible interpretation and respect for parliamentary sovereignty; and (4) an assessment of the compatibility of parliamentary sovereignty with recent constitutional developments, including the expansion of judicial review of administrative action, the Human Rights and European Communities Acts and the growing recognition of 'constitutional principles' and 'constitutional statutes'"--
In: The Cambridge Constitutional History of the United Kingdom (Cambridge UP, Forthcoming)
SSRN
Working paper