Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Monopoly as a Contracting Problem -- 2. The Choice of Regulatory Strategy -- I Regulatory Politics and Dynamics -- 3. The Behavior of Regulatory Agencies -- 4. Capture and Instability: Sri Lanka's Buses and U.S. Telephones -- 5. Incompleteness and Its Consequences: Argentina's Railroads -- 6. Forestalling Expropriation: Electricity in the Americas -- II Contract versus Discretionary Regulation -- 7. The Evolution of Concession Contracts: Municipal Franchises in North America -- 8. The Rediscovery of Private Contracts: U.S. Railroad and Airline Deregulation -- 9. Price-Cap Regulation: The British Water Industry -- III Vertical Unbundling and Regulation -- 10. The Trade-off in Unbundling: Competition versus Coordination -- 11. Regulating Coordination: British Railroads -- 12. Designing Capacity Markets: Electricity in Argentina -- 13. The Prospects for Unbundling -- 14. The Future of Regulation -- Notes -- Index.

A Brookings Institution Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy publication Over the past two decades Americans have become increasingly skeptical about the benefits of community growth and hostile to new taxes--while continuing to demand improvements in local services. One response to this tension has been a burgeoning movement to raise public revenue by regulating growth. In this timely book, the authors explain that most growing localities now require private developers to finance public improvements as a condition for receiving permits to build. These permit conditions, known as "exactions," are most commonly used to ensure that infrastructure capacity will be adequate to serve the occupants of new real estate developments and to lessen the harmful effects of these developments on other local citizens. Exactions are often used to finance new roads, water and waste disposal facilities, and public open space, but some communities have begun to require developer financing for such services as day care, job training, low-cost housing, and ride sharing. The authors see the dramatic growth of exaction financing as an epochal shift in the character of American land use regulation. A function once isolated from the local government mainstream is now close to heart of fiscal and public works decisionmaking. Politicians find exactions an extremely valuable tactic for resolving land use conflict. Lawyers and developers worry about how to establish appropriate limits on the use of exaction, economists debate their equity and efficiency, and planners consider their effect on urban reform. Regulation for Revenue offers an integrated appraisal of exaction financing, showing that exactions come in many forms and that they can be meaningfully evaluated only by comparison with realistic alternatives. These include growth restrictions, tolerance of

"January 1989." ; Performing organization: Harvard Graduate School of Design and John F. Kennedy School of Government. ; Bibliography: p. 213-230. ; Final report. ; Mode of access: Internet.