BACKGROUND: In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. OBJECTIVES: To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. METHODS: This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. RESULTS: Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
In: Herman , A , Uter , W , Rustemeyer , T , Matura , M , Aalto-Korte , K , Duus Johansen , J , Gonçalo , M , White , I R , Balato , A , Giménez Arnau , A M , Brockow , K , Mortz , C G , Mahler , V , Goossens , A & the ESCD, EECDRG, EADV Contact Dermatitis Task Force, EAACI 2021 , ' Position statement : The need for EU legislation to require disclosure and labelling of the composition of medical devices ' , Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology , vol. 35 , no. 7 , pp. 1444-1448 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17238
Background: In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. Objectives: To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. Methods: This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. Results: Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
In: Herman , A , Uter , W , Rustemeyer , T , Matura , M , Aalto-Korte , K , Duus Johansen , J , Gonçalo , M , White , I R , Balato , A , Giménez Arnau , A M , Brockow , K , Mortz , C G , Mahler , V , Goossens , A & the ESCD, EECDRG, EADV Contact Dermatitis Task Force, EAACI 2021 , ' Position statement : The need for EU legislation to require disclosure and labelling of the composition of medical devices ' , Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology , vol. 35 , no. 7 , pp. 1444-1448 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17238
Background: In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. Objectives: To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. Methods: This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. Results: Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
In recent years, skin reactions secondary to the use of medical devices (MD), such as allergic contact dermatitis have increasingly been observed (e.g. to continuous blood sugar monitoring systems, insulin pumps, wound dressings, medical gloves, etc.): this is regarded as a developing epidemic. Lack of labelling of the composition of MD, as well as frequent lack of cooperation of manufacturers to disclose this relevant information, even when contacted by the clinician for the individual case of an established adverse reaction, significantly impede patient care. To advocate for full ingredient labelling in the implementation of EU regulation for MD. This position paper reviews the scientific literature, the current regulatory framework adopted for MD to date, and the likely impact, including some costs data in case of the absence of such labelling. Efforts made by several scientific teams, who are trying to identify the culprit of such adverse effects, either via asking for cooperation from companies, or using costly chemical analyses of MD, can only partly, and with considerable delay, compensate for the absence of meaningful information on the composition of MD; hence, patient management is compromised. Indeed, without knowing the chemical substances present, physicians are unable to inform patients about which substances they should avoid, and which alternative MD may be suitable/tolerated. There is an urgent need for full and accurate labelling of the chemical composition of MD in contact with the human body.
In: Zuberbier , T , Aberer , W , Asero , R , Abdul Latiff , A H , Baker , D , Ballmer-Weber , B , Bernstein , J A , Bindslev-Jensen , C , Brzoza , Z , Buense Bedrikow , R , Canonica , G W , Church , M K , Craig , T , Danilycheva , I V , Dressler , C , Ensina , L F , Giménez-Arnau , A , Godse , K , Gonçalo , M , Grattan , C , Hebert , J , Hide , M , Kaplan , A , Kapp , A , Katelaris , C H , Kocatürk , E , Kulthanan , K , Larenas-Linnemann , D , Leslie , T A , Magerl , M , Mathelier-Fusade , P , Meshkova , R Y , Metz , M , Nast , A , Nettis , E , Oude-Elberink , H , Rosumeck , S , Saini , S S , Sánchez-Borges , M , Schmid-Grendelmeier , P , Staubach , P , Sussman , G , Toubi , E , Vena , G A , Vestergaard , C , Wedi , B , Werner , R N , Zhao , Z & Maurer , M 2018 , ' The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria ' , Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , vol. 73 , no. 7 , pp. 1393-1414 . https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13397
This evidence- and consensus-based guideline was developed following the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. The conference was held on 1 December 2016. It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the EU-founded network of excellence, the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the World Allergy Organization (WAO) with the participation of 48 delegates of 42 national and international societies. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast cell-driven disease, presenting with wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic spontaneous urticaria and other chronic forms of urticaria are disabling, impair quality of life and affect performance at work and school. This guideline covers the definition and classification of urticaria, taking into account the recent progress in identifying its causes, eliciting factors and pathomechanisms. In addition, it outlines evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.
In: Zuberbier , T , Abdul Latiff , A H , Abuzakouk , M , Aquilina , S , Asero , R , Baker , D , Ballmer-Weber , B , Bangert , C , Ben-Shoshan , M , Bernstein , J A , Bindslev-Jensen , C , Brockow , K , Brzoza , Z , Chong-Neto , H J , Church , M K , Criado , P R , Danilycheva , I V , Dressler , C , Ensina , L F , Fonacier , L , Gaskins , M , Gáspár , K , Gelincik , A , Giménez-Arnau , A , Godse , K , Gonçalo , M , Grattan , C , Grosber , M , Hamelmann , E , Hébert , J , Hide , M , Kaplan , A , Kapp , A , Kessel , A , Kocatürk , E , Kulthanan , K , Larenas-Linnemann , D , Lauerma , A , Leslie , T , Magerl , M , Makris , M , Meshkova , R Y , Metz , M , Micallef , D , Mortz , C G , Nast , A , Oude-Elberink , H , Pawankar , R , Pigatto , P , Ratti Sisa , H , Gutiérrez , M I R , Saini , S S , Schmid-Grendelmeier , P , Sekerel , B E , Siebenhaar , F , Siiskonen , H , Soria , A , Staubach-Renz , P , Stingeni , L , Sussman , G , Szegedi , A , Thomsen , S F , Vadasz , Z , Vestergaard , C , Wedi , B , Zhao , Z & Maurer , M 2022 , ' The International EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI Guideline for the Definition, Classification, Diagnosis and Management of Urticaria ' , Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology , vol. 77 , no. 3 , pp. 734-766 . https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15090
This update and revision of the international guideline for urticaria was developed following the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN) and its Urticaria and Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs and ACAREs), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF; EuroGuiDerm), and the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology with the participation of 64 delegates of 50 national and international societies and from 31 countries. The consensus conference was held on 3 December 2020. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast-cell-driven disease that presents with wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic urticaria, i.e. chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria, is disabling, impairs quality of life, and affects performance at work and school. This updated version of the international guideline for urticaria covers the definition and classification of urticaria and outlines expert-guided and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.