Search results

After the collapse of the USSR, a huge superpower that occupied one sixth of the land, the question of succession arose before the states that were part of it. The USSR occupied a vast territory, participated in international obligations, had debts, was a member of international organizations. It was obvious that the relationship between the newly formed states depended on how it was possible to divide the "legacy" of the USSR. The USSR took an active position at the international level, was engaged in the development of weapons. The issue of dividing all assets and liabilities worried the entire international community. His decision was difficult, and the legal basis for making decisions on succession did not seem to everyone to be indisputable. At present, it is obvious to everyone that the Russian Federation became the main heir of the USSR, it was the Russian Federation that continued the policy of the USSR, continued to participate in international relations and in the fulfillment of obligations, despite the equality of all states that were part of the USSR. The issues of the succession of the USSR and Russia are the subject of study of modern international law. Within the framework of this article, some aspects of the indicated topic will be highlighted.

The work is devoted to the consideration of some of the elements of the original system of Iranian legislation. The legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran has a number of special elements that are not found in any other country in the modern world. These features are due to the fact that the state structure of Iran is a system of civil and religious authorities that play a primary role.

The article aims to give a comprehensive analysis of the forms of participation of Russian citizens in the im-plementation of public control. The paper examines the content of the concept of "the form of participation of Russian citizens in the organization and implementation of public control" in the context of its correlation with the concept of "form of public control", and gives the author's definition of these concepts. The article formaliz-es and analyzes the main problems associated with the consolidation in the current legislation and implemen-tation in practice of the forms of participation of Russian citizens in the implementation of public control. The author has developed and substantiated a system of measures to resolve these problems in order to ensure optimal conditions for the participation of Russian citizens in the organization and implementation of the insti-tute of public control and its activities with optimal efficiency and effectiveness.

The article touches upon the issue of public-law analysis of the features of suspension and termination of pub-lic chambers and council members' powers in the Russian Federation of all levels. The author substantiates the point of view according to which the suspension and termination of the above-mentioned powers acts not only as a consequence of a change in the legal status of members of subjects of public control, or the occurrence of certain events, the expiration of certain deadlines, but also as a measure of influence (punishment) on these persons if their activities (behavior) does not correspond to the high status of a member public chamber (coun-cil). The paper examines the key problems associated with the implementation of the institution of suspension and termination of powers of members of the above-mentioned subjects of public control in Russia, developed and justified a system of measures to resolve these problems.

The article is devoted to the analysis of the restrictions related to membership in public chambers and councils enshrined in the Russian legislation on public control. The relevance of the research topic is due to the need to determine the necessary and sufficient list of restrictions in the activities of members of civic chambers and councils, which allow to ensure objective, impartial, unbiased performance of their duties by these members of the subjects of public control in the process of preparation and implementation of public control measures. The paper investigates the reasons for the necessity of legislative enshrinement of these restrictions, develops and substantiates their author's classification, studies the main points of view regarding the content and limits of these restrictions. The paper identifies the main problems associated with the consolidation and implementa-tion of these restrictions by members of public chambers and councils in Russia, and develops and justifies a system of measures to resolve these problems.

The article scrutinizes the current problems and prospects for the development of the goals and objectives of public control in the Russian Federation. The relevance of the study hinges primarily on the necessity to optimize the goals and objectives of this institution of civil society in order to ensure its development as the most important legal guarantee of the consti-tutional principles of democracy and public participation of society in the management of public affairs. The paper formalizes and identifies the main obstacles to achieving the goals and objectives of social control. The system of measures to raise these problems is developed: a) by consolidating this institution of civil society in the Constitution of the Russian Federation; b) by supplementing the list of principles, goals and objectives of public control in the legislation; c) by expanding the powers of its subjects; d) by analyzing and introducing in the Russian Federation the positive foreign experience of achieving the goals and solving the problems of civil society control over public authorities; e) by fixing the system of criteria for assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of public control.

The paper analyzes the system of objects of public control in Russia, studies some points of view in the scien-tific legal literature as to whether banks and other credit organizations belong to them. Constitutional and legal analysis of the activities of the latter in the designated status is presented in the article. It substantiates the ne-cessity to organize and conduct public control activities in relation to this category of objects. Besides, the article studies the main problems hindering this, develops and justifies the system of measures to resolve these prob-lems, including by making appropriate amendments and additions to the Constitution of the Russian Federa-tion and legislation. In addition, the constitutional-legal analysis of the system of objects of public control in Russia is carried out using formal-logical, comparative-legal, historical-legal, statistical, sociological methods of research.

The present article is focused on the constitutional-legal analysis of the need to organize and implement con-trol measures by social structures in relation to enterprises, institutions and organizations of public transport. As a research task the author identified an attempt to justify the position, according to which the activities of these legal entities, which, on the one hand, are, as a rule, transport monopolies, and on the other hand, have the right to exercise certain public powers (for example, in terms of collecting fines from stowaways who have not paid for travel and do not belong to the privileged categories of citizens who have the right to free travel in pub-lic transport), should become an object of attention of the social control subjects on a mandatory basis and in a permanent mode. The article formalizes and explores the main problems that hinder the organization and im-plementation of public control measures in relation to enterprises, institutions and organizations of public transport. Thus, the author has developed and substantiated the system of proposals resolve the above-mentioned problems.

This article is focused on the constitutional and legal analysis of the need to develop a model code of ethics for a representative of a public control entity in the Russian Federation. The paper substantiates the role and place of the institute of public control as the most important legal guarantee for the implementation and protection of the constitutional principles of democracy and public participation in the management of state affairs, as well as the importance of representatives of subjects of public control as key participants in its activities. The article examines modern legal requirements for the behavior of representatives of the subjects of public control, justi-fies the need to develop and adopt at the federal level a model code of ethics of these representatives, analyz-es the various authors' points of view on the relevance of this code of ethics for the development of the public control entity. Analysis of the main problems hindering the development and implementation of the specified model code of ethics is carried out in the work, the system of measures to resolve them is developed and justi-fied.

Este artículo está dedicado al estudio de los principios de regulación legal de las relaciones migratorias y tiene como propósito desde el punto de vista de los métodos legales el estudiar las relaciones migratorias para analizar el grado de desarrollo y consolidación de los principios de regulación legal de las relaciones migratorias en la legislación nacional e internacional, así como en la ciencia jurídica.

This article is dedicated to the study of the principles of legal regulation of migratory relations and its purpose is from the point of view of legal methods to study migratory relations to analyze the degree of development and consolidation of the principles of legal regulation of migratory relations in national and international legislation, as well as in legal science. ; Este artículo está dedicado al estudio de los principios de regulación legal de las relaciones migratorias y tiene como propósito desde el punto de vista de los métodos legales el estudiar las relaciones migratorias para analizar el grado de desarrollo y consolidación de los principios de regulación legal de las relaciones migratorias en la legislación nacional e internacional, así como en la ciencia jurídica.

Este artículo está dedicado al análisis de los procesos de migración en el Imperio ruso (XVIII - principios del siglo XX). El objeto del estudio fueron las relaciones sociales asociadas con los procesos de migración de la población (externa e interna) en el Imperio ruso en el período especificado. Se presta especial atención a las normas del derecho nacional ruso en el Imperio ruso desde principios del siglo XVIII hasta principios del siglo XX, que consagran los principios de regulación legal de las relaciones jurídicas en el campo de los procesos migratorios; posición de la doctrina jurídica rusa en el campo del derecho migratorio. ; This article is devoted to the analysis of migration processes in the Russian Empire (XVIII – early XX centuries). The object of the study was social relations associated with the processes of population migration (external and internal) in the Russian Empire in the specified period. Particular attention is paid to the norms of Russian national law in the Russian Empire from the beginning of the 18th century to the beginning of the 20th century, enshrining the principles of legal regulation of legal relations in the field of migration processes; position of the Russian legal doctrine in the field of migration law.

Este artículo está dedicado al análisis de los procesos de migración en el Imperio ruso (XVIII - principios del siglo XX). El objeto del estudio fueron las relaciones sociales asociadas con los procesos de migración de la población (externa e interna) en el Imperio ruso en el período especificado. Se presta especial atención a las normas del derecho nacional ruso en el Imperio ruso desde principios del siglo XVIII hasta principios del siglo XX, que consagran los principios de regulación legal de las relaciones jurídicas en el campo de los procesos migratorios; posición de la doctrina jurídica rusa en el campo del derecho migratorio.