The value of the corporate governance canon on Chinese companies
In: Journal of Chinese governance, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 20-42
ISSN: 2381-2354
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Chinese governance, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 20-42
ISSN: 2381-2354
A complex business environment calls for a flexible administrative law for the agencies that oversee corporations. No where illustrates this maxim better than Hong Kong, and its need to reform corporate regulations after the Panama Papers revelations. We describe how only a 'non-administrative' administrative law can best cope with the challenges facing the regulation of corporate governance. Such a flexible, results-oriented approach to administrative law develops new principles and tests, rather than gives civil servants instructions. Such an approach to corporate governance can facilitate the assessment of company governance, corporate disclosure, the self-regulation of professional groups like lawyers and accountants, as well as ensure corporations engage in 'legitimate economic purposes.' We engage with the literature, showing why such a flexible approach to administrative rulemaking would more likely reduce some of the government regulation and oversight problems exposed by the Panama Papers than previous approaches toward drafting and implementing administrative law (at least in this area).
BASE
In: Chinese Journal of Global Governance 5(2), 2019
SSRN
Working paper
In: Transnational Legal Theory 11(4), 2020
SSRN
In: University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016/048
SSRN
In: 29 C&SLJ 125 (2011)
SSRN
In: Bruce Aronson and Joongi Kim (eds.), Corporate Governance in Asia: A Comparative Approach (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2019) 150-181.
SSRN
Working paper
In: Capital Markets Law Journal 15(1), 2020 (for the first half) Notre Dame Journal of Legislation 46(4), 2020 (for second half)
SSRN
Working paper
In: International banking, finance and economic law 23
In: University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2018/025
SSRN
Working paper
In: University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2014/012
SSRN
Working paper