Contraception in Research: A Policy Suggestion
In: IRB: ethics & human research, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 15
ISSN: 2326-2222
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: IRB: ethics & human research, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 15
ISSN: 2326-2222
In: Ethics & human research: E&HR : a publication of the Hastings Center, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 16-21
ISSN: 2578-2363
ABSTRACTHow research during a public health emergency is conducted is recognized as essential to the public health response to that emergency. Such research needs to undergo substantive and meaningful ethical review in a timely manner. Rapid ethical review may be accomplished through a number of mechanisms, including use of local rapid‐response institutional review boards (IRBs). We describe use of such a model in the setting of the 2014 Ebola virus disease epidemic and the Rapid‐Response IRB's subsequent transition to a multisite single IRB model during the current Covid‐19 pandemic. The rapid‐response review model is characterized by a small IRB with extensive use of alternate members with specific expertise and by close collaboration with the investigator in an iterative process.
In: Ethics & human research: E&HR : a publication of the Hastings Center, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 33-35
ISSN: 2578-2363
In: Health security, Band 20, Heft S1, S. S-60-S-70
ISSN: 2326-5108