Suchergebnisse

The article presents various approaches and methods of historiographic research, shows the interrelation between history and historiography. The works depicting the historiographic analysis of important sociological categories and concepts are singled out. The subject, methods and tasks of historiographic studies of the knowledge of sociological science are characterized. Types and varieties of historiographic sources are indicated. The article definitely starts the sociological direction in historiography, highlights the degree of study of historiographic and source research problems. The historiography of sociological science is defined as a branch of knowledge that studies the history of accumulation of sociological knowledge, the development of sociological thought and research methodology, the history of the creation of sociological works and biographies of scientists, the influence of sociopolitical life phenomena on the work of sociologists and the impact of sociological thought on public consciousness, the history of scientific institutions , organization of sociological education and dissemination of sociological knowledge.Attention is drawn to the experience of one of the most famous and influential historiographic schools of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries – the Klyuchevsky school. This school carried out a synthesis of history and sociology. Revising the conceptual tools of knowledge of the past, which the preceding historiography had, he largely shaped the subject and method of national history in a new way, focusing on analyzing the evolution of the social structure of society, researching social and economic processes, rather than describing outstanding events. Due to this, the emphasis from political and legal history was shifted to the socio-economic history. This research orientation had a clear humanistic orientation, as it brought historical research closer to the person in his social environment.The historiography of the sociological approach in the microdynamic studies of J. Turner is described, which reflects the nature and direction of theoretical studies, which are distinguished by an orientation towards active theoretical and multilateral conceptual synthesis. Attention is drawn to the fact that the very fact of developing a theory of this type testifies to the nature of the unfolding of theoretical perspectives in modern sociology. T. Kuhn's role in the development of historiographic research is shown. In particular, the historiography and sociological aspect of Kuhn's theory is that various episodes in the development of historiography of sociological science contribute to reconstructing the historical process of sociology, revealing its beginnings and ends, and bridging the gap between sociological theorists and social practices.

The article presents various approaches and methods of historiographic research, shows the interrelation between history and historiography. The works depicting the historiographic analysis of important sociological categories and concepts are singled out. The subject, methods and tasks of historiographic studies of the knowledge of sociological science are characterized. Types and varieties of historiographic sources are indicated. The article definitely starts the sociological direction in historiography, highlights the degree of study of historiographic and source research problems. The historiography of sociological science is defined as a branch of knowledge that studies the history of accumulation of sociological knowledge, the development of sociological thought and research methodology, the history of the creation of sociological works and biographies of scientists, the influence of sociopolitical life phenomena on the work of sociologists and the impact of sociological thought on public consciousness, the history of scientific institutions , organization of sociological education and dissemination of sociological knowledge.Attention is drawn to the experience of one of the most famous and influential historiographic schools of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries – the Klyuchevsky school. This school carried out a synthesis of history and sociology. Revising the conceptual tools of knowledge of the past, which the preceding historiography had, he largely shaped the subject and method of national history in a new way, focusing on analyzing the evolution of the social structure of society, researching social and economic processes, rather than describing outstanding events. Due to this, the emphasis from political and legal history was shifted to the socio-economic history. This research orientation had a clear humanistic orientation, as it brought historical research closer to the person in his social environment.The historiography of the sociological approach in the microdynamic studies of J. Turner is described, which reflects the nature and direction of theoretical studies, which are distinguished by an orientation towards active theoretical and multilateral conceptual synthesis. Attention is drawn to the fact that the very fact of developing a theory of this type testifies to the nature of the unfolding of theoretical perspectives in modern sociology. T. Kuhn's role in the development of historiographic research is shown. In particular, the historiography and sociological aspect of Kuhn's theory is that various episodes in the development of historiography of sociological science contribute to reconstructing the historical process of sociology, revealing its beginnings and ends, and bridging the gap between sociological theorists and social practices. ; В статье представлены различные подходы и способы историографических исследований, показана взаимосвязь истории и историографии. Выделены работы, отображающие историографический анализ важных социологических категорий и понятий. Охарактеризованы предмет, методы и задачи историографических исследований познания социологической науки. Обозначены виды и разновидности историографических источников. В статье определено начало социологического направления в историографии, освещается степень изученности историографических и источниковедческих проблем исследования. Обращается внимание на опыт одной из самых известных и влиятельных историографических школ конца ХІХ – начала ХХ века – школы Ключевского. Эта школа осуществила синтез истории и социологии. Описана историография социологического похода в микродинамических исследованиях Дж. Тернера, которая отражает характер и направленность теоретических изысканий, отличающихся ориентацией на активный теоретический и многосторонний концептуальный синтез. Акцентировано внимание на том, что сам факт разработки теории такого типа свидетельствует о характере развертывания теоретических перспектив в современной социологии. Показана роль Т. Куна в развитии историографических исследований. В частности, историографико-социологический аспект теории Куна состоит в том, что различные эпизоды в развитии историографии социологической науки способствуют реконструкции исторического процесса социологии, выявлению ее начал и концов, преодолению разрыва между теоретиками социологии и социальными практиками. ; У статті представлені різні підходи і способи історіографічних досліджень, показано взаємозв'язок історії та історіографії. Виділено роботи, що відображають історіографічний аналіз важливих соціологічних категорій і понять. Охарактеризовані предмет, методи і завдання історіографічних досліджень пізнання соціологічної науки. Позначені види і різновиди історіографічних джерел. У статті визначено початок соціологічного напрямку в історіографії, висвітлюється ступінь вивченості історіографічних і джерелознавчих проблем дослідження. Звертається увага на досвід однієї з найвідоміших і найвпливовіших історіографічних шкіл кінця ХІХ – початку ХХ століття – школи Ключевського. Ця школа здійснила синтез історії та соціології. Описана історіографія соціологічного походу в мікродинамічних дослідженнях Дж. Тернера, яка відображає характер і спрямованість теоретичних розробок, що відрізняються орієнтацією на активний теоретичний і багатосторонній концептуальний синтез. Акцентовано увагу на тому, що сам факт розробки теорії такого типу свідчить про характер розгортання теоретичних перспектив у сучасній соціології. Показана роль Т. Куна в розвитку історіографічних досліджень. Зокрема, історіографіко-соціологічний аспект теорії Куна полягає в тому, що різні епізоди в розвитку історіографії соціологічної науки сприяють реконструкції історичного процесу соціології, виявленню її початків і кінців, подоланню розриву між теоретиками соціології та соціальними практиками.

The main question addressed in this paper is what happens when the usual sociological predictors (family background and educational attainment, for example) fail to predict labour market success and failure The paper presents evidence from surveys conducted in 1999 among 1300 25-26 year olds in Moscow, Vladikavkaz and Dneipropetrovsk which shows that this was indeed the situation in these places, and probably in most other parts of the former Soviet Union also. Our analysis also draws on evidence from focus groups conducted in Moscow and Dneipropetrovsk during 2002 with a total of 25 recent university graduates. All these young people were 'succeeding' according to the definition of success adopted in our analysis. It is argued that in the new market economies young people's prospects really have become unpredictable: that there are no efficacious but so far overlooked social or psychological variables. Young people's ways of coping with their chaotic conditions are identified: 'keeping faith' with customary reliabilities, off-setting risks, and endeavouring to de-couple their personal prospects from macro-realities. The paper concludes by evaluating competing explanations of the new unpredictability. It is argued that specifically post-Soviet economic trends and conditions in the 1990s are wholly responsible, and that, irrespective of whether the economies recover or remain depressed, the unpredictability of success will most likely be a short-term phenomenon.