Nationalism
In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives, 2017, Paul Joseph (ed.), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp.1192-1195, DOI: 10.4135/9781483359878.n450
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives, 2017, Paul Joseph (ed.), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp.1192-1195, DOI: 10.4135/9781483359878.n450
SSRN
In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives, 2017, Paul Joseph (ed.), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp.732-733, doi/10.4135/9781483359878.n279
SSRN
In: Studies in ethnicity and nationalism: SEN, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 203-204
ISSN: 1754-9469
In: Studies in ethnicity and nationalism: SEN, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 386-389
ISSN: 1754-9469
In: Political studies review, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 295-296
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 825-826
ISSN: 1469-8129
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 825-826
ISSN: 1354-5078
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 825-826
ISSN: 1354-5078
In: Defunct Federalisms: Critical Perspectives on Federal Failure (2008), Kavalski, E. & Zolkos, M. (eds.) Aldershot: Ashgate, pp.31-45
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Ab imperio: studies of new imperial history and nationalism in the Post-Soviet space, Band 2005, Heft 1, S. 353-358
ISSN: 2164-9731
This working paper explores the governance of protracted displacement across global, regional and domestic levels in the context of the project "Transnational Figurations of Displacement" (TRAFIG). The multiple contemporary crises that have led to forced displacement show not only the limits of a tight definition of 'refugee', but also highlight the gaps in international protection frameworks. A significant number of those forcibly displaced are in protracted displacement situations. This paper is an effort to make sense of the legislative and policy frameworks of protection that apply globally, regionally and domestically, and the way in which these frameworks facilitate or hinder solutions for people in protracted displacement. We evaluate how these frameworks contribute (directly or indirectly) to resolving or creating protracted displacement, assess how they contribute to relevant policy developments and identify engagement trends and (unintended) effects. Along the way, we also draw comparative insights across different global, regional and domestic levels, including eight different countries that host large groups of displaced people and are the focus of the TRAFIG project: Greece, Germany and Italy in Europe; Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Tanzania in Africa; and Jordan and Pakistan in Asia. We explore some selected gaps in the current systems of governance of displacement, while concentrating on three key perspectives: governing protection, exercising rights and accessing services, and mobility and transnational dimensions of displacement. We conclude with ten key messages regarding the shortcomings of the current governance system of displacement. They highlight the need for stronger stakeholder collaboration, integration of global and local policies, enhanced focus on IDPs, investment in progressive regional policies, redesign of EU policies to avoid promotion of protracted displacement, greater ownership of processes and resources, de-politicisation of displacement policies, alignment of durable solutions with development-oriented interventions, realisation of the development potential of refugee integration. They also focus on mobility and translocal connectivity as a fourth durable solution to protracted displacement.
BASE
This working paper explores the governance of protracted displacement across global, regional and domestic levels in the context of the project "Transnational Figurations of Displacement" (TRAFIG). Themultiple contemporary crises that have led to forced displacement show not only the limits of a tight definition of 'refugee' but also highlight the gaps in international protection frameworks. A significant number of those forcibly displaced are in protracted displacement situations. This paper is an effort to make sense of the legislative and policy frameworks of protection that apply globally, regionally and domestically, and the way in which these frameworks facilitate or hinder solutions for people in protracted displacement. We evaluate how these frameworks contribute (directly or indirectly) to resolving or creating protracted displacement, assess how they contribute to relevant policy developments and identify engagement trends and (unintended) effects. Along the way, we also draw comparative insights across different global, regional and domestic levels, including eight different countries that host large groups of displaced people and are the focus of the TRAFIG project: Greece, Germany and Italy in Europe; Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Tanzania in Africa; and Jordan and Pakistan in Asia. We explore some selected gaps in the current systems of governance of displacement while concentrating on three key perspectives: governing protection, exercising rights and accessing services, and mobility and transnational dimensions of displacement. We conclude with ten key messages regarding the shortcomings of the current governance system of displacement. They highlight the need for stronger stakeholder collaboration, integration of global and local policies, enhanced focus on IDPs, investment in progressive regional policies, redesign of EU policies to avoid promotion of protracted displacement, greater ownership of processes and resources, de-politicisation of displacement policies, ...
BASE