Suchergebnisse

The article analyzes the policy and practice of neo-imperialism in the Russian Federation, examines the specificity of Putinizm as a historical challenge posed by the post-Soviet post-colonial elites of the former USSR, in this case, the Ukrainian ones. Existing certain toleration of the culture of the colonizer, inherent in a large number of representatives of the Ukrainian elites, both political, and economic and creative, is one of the hallmarks of their unshakable post-colonialism, which, in turn, hinders the transformation of Ukraine into a modern European civilized state and a full-fledged modern nation. The need for a more determined opposition to the political and ideological influences of the modern Kremlin, its neo-imperial actions, theprovision of more effective and tougher resistance to the aggressor-Putin's Russia, which invaded Ukraine and imposed a hybrid war on its people, is not only a requirement that is relevant to self-preservation and consolidation Ukrainian independent nation, but also a persistent advice from the politicians of different countries who are committed to Ukraine and advanced analysts from the present-day Russia. Moreover, the real history of post-Soviet Ukraine and the post-Soviet Russia is a confirmation of the differences, including ideological, between the two peoples. At a time when post-colonial Ukraine was looking for itself in the labyrinths of many, and especially of the two-vectored, having finally ended on the road to a common European home, Russia tried to become democratic, but its efforts in this direction ended in defeat. Some of the contemporary Russian philosophers generally argue that the post-Soviet period in Russia went on an effort to return to the USSR. The Russian post-Soviet postcolonial period tried to get rid of their own "humiliation" and "to rise from their knees". A number of contemporary Russian intellectuals even argues that raising the people from their knees is the only real merit of the President of the Russian Federation VV. Putin before the Russian people. For example, the president of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaitė has repeatedly expressed the opinion that Ukraine should take a much more resolute stand against the policies and actions of Putin's Russia. The ability to effectively confront an insidious aggressor - Putin's Russia - has become an exam today for Ukrainian elites regarding their viability and effectiveness.

In the article the formation of the personality cult of the president of modern RF V. Putin is observed, whom a great number of analysts in Ukraine and in the world is called a new personal dictatorship in the former Soviet Union. The inseparability of the establishment of a dictatorial regime from the Kremlin's neo-imperial policy, which has already become known as "Putinism" and "racism", is analyzed. The gender analysis methodology is used to identify the grounds for mass perceptions of dictatorial regimes by the population of the State. Pointing to the dangers of the Kremlin's dictatorial regime for Ukraine's democracy and independence. To substantiate the main provisions of the study, an analysis of a particular material from the current reality of the RF is used. Historical parallels between the dictatorships of the past and present, including the dictatorial regime of A. Hitler, I. Stalin, F. Castro, are conducted. It is concluded that in the situation with dictators for their countries there is a serious danger. But today, due to Russia's technical capabilities, mortal danger can become a reality not only for the loyal dictator of the people. But for Ukraine and the world.