Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Philosophers and their Critics
This is the first book devoted to the work of Ernest Sosa, one of the most influential contemporary epistemologists. Part of the acclaimed Philosophers and Their Critics series. The editor's introduction serves as an introduction to Sosa's epistemology. Contains critical essays by more than twenty of the most prominent epistemologists in the world, commenting on Sosa's work. Concludes with Sosa's own reply to his critics
In: Cambridge studies in philosophy
In: Cambridge Studies in Philosophy Series
This book, first published in 2000, is about the nature of skeptical arguments and their role in philosophical inquiry. John Greco argues that a number of historically prominent skeptical arguments make no obvious mistake, and therefore cannot be easily dismissed.
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 200, Heft 5
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft S15, S. 3593-3607
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 197, Heft 7, S. 2867-2878
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 85-104
Part One of the paper argues against evidentialism and individualism in religiousepistemology, and in favor of a "social turn" in the field. The idea here is that humanbelief in general, and religious belief in particular, is largely characterized by epistemicdependence on other persons. An adequate epistemology, it is agued, ought to recognizeand account for social epistemic dependence.Part Two considers a problem that becomes salient when we make such a turn. Inshort, how are we to understand the transmission of knowledge and rational faith in areligious tradition? The problem arises because, by all accounts, even the best traditionstransmit superstitions, self-serving prejudices, and other things that are down right falseon any reasonable view. So how is it that these same traditions can also transmit rationalfaith and even knowledge by means of the very same channels, for example channels ofreligious authority and religious teaching?Part Three offers a tentative solution to this problem.
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 197, Heft 12, S. 5159-5159
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 197, Heft 12, S. 5147-5157
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 158, Heft 3, S. 299-302
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 85, Heft 2, S. 245-277
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Children and youth services review: an international multidisciplinary review of the welfare of young people, Band 149, S. 106930
ISSN: 0190-7409