Search results

Intro -- Title Page -- Introduction -- Chapter 1: Revisiting the New Deal's Full-Employment/Right-to-Work Agenda -- Chapter 2: The Political Economy of Martin Luther King, Jr. -- Chapter 3: Full Employment, Right to Work, and the Beloved Community -- Chapter 4: The Contribution of William A. Darity, Jr. -- Chapter 5: The Contribution of Philip Harvey -- Chapter 6: The Full-Employment/Right-to-Work Agenda -- Bibliography.

Knowledge of the occupancy of campuses or buildings is important in order to deploy and distribute resources. Likewise, knowledge of the directions and types of movement of people and vehicles is important for urban planners, governments, facilities managers, etc. This disclosure describes techniques to derive real-time and long-term occupancy and people-movement data based on information received from devices. Such data can be utilized by a variety of customers, such as insurers, facilities managers, urban planners, governments, property owners, etc.

This report identifies, for the 112th Congress, all nominations to full-time positions requiring Senate confirmation in 40 organizations in the executive branch (27 independent agencies, 6 agencies in the Executive Office of the President [EOP], and 7 multilateral organizations) and 4 agencies in the legislative branc

This Article will explore whether the law may require the disclosure of adequate proprietary information to enable effective regulation. Part II will discuss the settled law regarding the property status of trade secrets, the regulatory takings doctrine, the applicability of the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution to proprietary data, and the exactions doctrine. Part III will explore the validity of the mandatory submission of proprietary health, safety, and environmental data to government regulators, with the guarantee that such data will be kept secret from competitors and the public. Part IV will then explore the validity of regulation mandating public disclosure of such proprietary information, and will discuss the implications for regulation of deepwater drilling. Finally, Part V will discuss the implications of the exactions doctrine for the validity of regulation requiring public disclosure of proprietary health, safety, and environmental data, as viewed through the lens of land use.

The article of record may be found at https://cgsr.llnl.gov ; This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-07-6 LCCN-2021901137 LLNL-BOOK-818513 TID-59693 ; This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-07-6 LCCN-2021901137 LLNL-BOOK-818513 TID-59693

In comparing the earnings of African American women to three reference groups—white women, African American men, and white men—three principal findings emerge. First, African American women residing in the suburbs are worse off than any other suburban group. Second, central city African American women are worse off than any other group of central city residents. Third, while central city residence imposes a statistically significant earnings penalty on men of both races, no such penalty is found for African American or white women. Therefore, African American women will enjoy no earnings advantage if they move to the suburbs. This finding underscores the importance of including women in studies of residential location and the socioeconomic status of African Americans. A narrow focus on male data to inform policy is clearly insufficient.

This research note uses a sample selection model to measure the earnings premium (or penalty) to public sector employment. A model correcting for both labor force participation and sectoral choice is estimated for both white and African American males. Results indicate that African American males are no better off in the public than in the private sector. Moreover, white males employed in the public sector earn significantly less than their private sector counterparts.

This comment discusses John Roemer's Marxian theory of dis crimination (RRPE 10:2). On the one hand, Roemer's analysis is a positive accomplishment since he accepts previous historical and statistical research verifying the existence of various forms of discrimination and then tries to situate discrimination in Marx's theory of value and exploitation of labor. In doing so, he generalizes several theorems arrived at previously by Morishima, Okishio, et al. concerning the static relationships between differences in the rate of exploi tation, the real wage and the rate of profit. However, Roemer's analysis suffers from his attempt to make inferences about the dynamics of exploitation, discrim ination and capitalist development based on an essentially static model. Roemer's model is a good first attempt at introducing discrimination into Marx's labor theory of value, but such a line of analysis will ultimately require si tuating discrimination in Marx's theory of reproduction and accumulation, not just in his static theory of exploitation.