Suchergebnisse

Developing health professional clinical educators able to meet the shifting health care requirements of this century is a current government priority. To change practices in the clinic, those who teach need to change and that is best achieved by specific curricula designed for faculty development. Principles revealed during an investigation of a successful community-based medical education program underpin the Master of Clinical Education (MCE) course, a new faculty development curriculum. After six years, it is timely to evaluate whether the educational goals of the MCE course are being met. The MCE faculty employed an independent research officer to conduct the study. A two-phase approach used semi-structured interviews and content analysis to develop and assess outcomes against an outcomes logic model. The program achieved all short-term goals: understanding the symbiotic model; commitment to self as teacher; and changes in the way to give feedback. It achieved two of three medium-term goals: belief of transformation; and relationship development. One medium-term goal was not met: developing a sense of community. This evaluation of the MCE course shows the program develops clinicians as committed educators and also as change agents who see building relationships as the key to operating effectively within complex health services and systems.

Introduction: Many strategies have been implemented to address the shortage of medical practitioners in rural areas. One such strategy, the Rural Clinical School Program supporting 18 rural clinical schools (RCSs), represents a substantial financial investment by the Australian Government. This is the first collaborative RCS study summarising the rural work outcomes of multiple RCSs. The aim of this study was to combine data from all RCSs' 2011 graduating classes to determine the association between rural location of practice in 2017 and (i) extended rural clinical placement during medical school (at least 12 months training in a rural area) and (ii) having a rural background. Methods: All medical schools funded under the RCS Program were contacted by email about participation in this study. Deidentified data were supplied for domestic students about their gender, origin (rural background defined as having lived in an Australian Standard Geographic Classification-Remoteness Area (ASGC-RA) 2-5 area for at least 5 years since beginning primary school) and participation in extended rural clinical placement (attended an RCS for at least 1 year of their clinical training). The postcode of their practice location according to the publicly available Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) register was collected (February to August 2017) and classified into rural and metropolitan areas using the ASGC 2006 and the more recent Modified Monash Model (MMM). The main outcome measure was whether graduates were working in a 'rural' area (ASGC categories RA2-5 or MMM categories 3-7) or 'metropolitan' area. Pearson's χ 2 test was used to detect differences in gender, rural background and extended placement at an RCS between rural and metropolitan practice locations. Binary logistic regression was used to determine odds of rural practice and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Although data were received from 14 universities, two universities had not started collecting origin data at this ...