Can public participation increase nature conservation effectiveness?
In: Innovation: the European journal of social science research, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 371-378
ISSN: 1469-8412
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Innovation: the European journal of social science research, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 371-378
ISSN: 1469-8412
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 48, S. 20-31
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 54, S. 287-296
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Qualitative sociology review: QSR, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 60-79
ISSN: 1733-8077
Incorporating human subjectivity in applied disciplines of social sciences and other base sciences poses a challenge as the nature of qualitative data is often the point of contention. Q methodology is a tool that addresses this challenge as it helps quantify qualitative data using Q factor analysis. Initially developed for psychology and political sciences, Q methodology now finds its use in many research disciplines of science, especially in interdisciplinary studies that take into account human subjectivity. This article provides a detailed description on the various steps involved in conducting a Q study, with special emphasis on data interpretation. To describe the methodology and demonstrate data interpretation, we used data from our pilot case study of socio-ecological nature that documents attitudes of people towards nature conservation on private land. Additionally, we mention the specific usefulness of this method, highlight the potential challenges at each step of the approach, and provide practical advice to overcome them. In our opinion, Q methodology has been more restricted in its use on the ground of being a more social or psychological tool, and therefore, our aim is to familiarize researchers who could be interested in a mixed approach of joining quantitative data analysis with qualitative, in-depth interpretation with the approach at hand.
Incorporating human subjectivity in applied disciplines of social sciences and other base sciences poses a challenge as the nature of qualitative data is often the point of contention. Q methodology is a tool that addresses this challenge as it helps quantify qualitative data using Q factor analysis. Initially developed for psychology and political sciences, Q methodology now finds its use in many research disciplines of science, especially in interdisciplinary studies that take into account human subjectivity. This article provides a detailed description on the various steps involved in conducting a Q study, with special emphasis on data interpretation. To describe the methodology and demonstrate data interpretation, we used data from our pilot case study of socio-ecological nature that documents attitudes of people towards nature conservation on private land. Additionally, we mention the specific usefulness of this method, highlight the potential challenges at each step of the approach, and provide practical advice to overcome them. In our opinion, Q methodology has been more restricted in its use on the ground of being a more social or psychological tool, and therefore, our aim is to familiarize researchers who could be interested in a mixed approach of joining quantitative data analysis with qualitative, in-depth interpretation with the approach at hand.
BASE
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 146, S. 185-202
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Waste management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, Band 142, S. 1-8
ISSN: 1879-2456
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 124, S. 90-100
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 107, S. 105494
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 158, S. 103783
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 119, S. 106193
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: International journal of sustainable development & world ecology, Band 21, Heft 6, S. 481-494
ISSN: 1745-2627
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 126, S. 152-163
ISSN: 1462-9011
The need for sustainability transitions is widely recognised, along with a concurrent need for the evolution of knowledge systems to inform more effective policy action. Although there are many new policy targets relating to net zero emissions and other sustainability challenges, cities, regional and national governments are struggling to rapidly develop transformational policies to achieve them. As academics and practitioners who work at the science-policy interface, we identify specific knowledge and competency needs for governing sustainability transitions related to the interlinked phases of envisioning, implementing and evaluating. In short, coordinated reforms of both policy and knowledge systems are urgently needed to address the speed and scale of sustainability challenges. These include embedding systems thinking literacy, mainstreaming participatory policy making, expanding the capacity to undertake transdisciplinary research, more adaptive governance and continuous organisational learning. These processes must guide further knowledge development, uptake and use as part of an iterative and holistic process. Such deep-seated change in policy-knowledge systems will be disruptive and presents challenges for traditional organisational models of knowledge delivery, but is essential for successful sustainability transformations.
BASE
In: Scale-sensitive Governance of the Environment, S. 241-262