Suchergebnisse

Die Regulierung verschiedener Märkte hat in den letzten Jahren deutlich zugenommen. Obwohl das Fehlen geeigneter Vorschriften sehr gefährlich sein kann, ist es dennoch wichtig, eine Überregulierung zu vermeiden, um die wirtschaftliche Freiheit als Grundlage des sozioökonomischen Systems in der westlichen Welt nicht zu gefährden. Die vergleichende Untersuchung deckt das Wettbewerbsrecht sowie die sektoralen Vorschriften des Telekommunikations-, Energie- und Finanzmarktes ab und dient dem Ziel der Überprüfung gemeinsamer Grundsätze, anhand derer die Maßnahmen verschiedener Regulierungsbehörden bewertet werden können. Der zweite Schritt ist die Festlegung gemeinsamer Standards für die Bewertung der Eingriffe von Regulierungsbehörden in die wirtschaftliche Freiheit. Das Buch ist nicht nur für Praktiker des Privatsektors von Bedeutung, sondern auch für Regulierungsbehörden der EU-Mitgliedstaaten sowie für nationale und EU-Gesetzgeber und berücksichtigt bereits die verstärkte Regulierung in der Corona-Krise. Mit Beiträgen von Robert Grzeszczak, Dawid Sześciło, Artur Szmigielski, Tomasz Klemt, Michał Dorociak, Maciej Sokołowski, Michalina Szpyrka, Paweł Wajda

Das Thema des Buches ist hinsichtlich der aktuellen Situation in Europa von großer Bedeutung. Die Autorinnen und Autoren untersuchen die rechtlichen Auswirkungen des Renationalisierungsprozesses auf die EU und ihre Mitgliedstaaten. Das Konzept der Renationalisierung verdeutlicht sich durch das Anliegen der Mitgliedstaaten, ihr Verhältnis zur EU zu überprüfen. Es wird die These formuliert, dass das Erstarken von Renationalisierungstendenzen im Bereich des Binnenmarktes u.a. durch eine offene Kritik an den Grundlagen der EU-Integration, Überlegungen einiger Mitgliedstaaten zum Rückzug aus der EU sowie durch Migration und Einwanderung und die damit verbundenen Probleme unterstützt wird.Die Analyse der Binnenmarktfreiheiten gibt einen deutlichen Hinweis auf die Auswirkungen der anhaltenden Tendenz der Renationalisierung auf Verbraucher, Arbeitnehmer, Unternehmer und Mitgliedstaaten: Einer der Einflussfaktoren ist definitiv der neue, dynamischere Wettbewerb zwischen den Mitgliedstaaten in sektoralen EU-Politiken (z. B. Energie oder Landwirtschaft), in bestimmten Bereichen (Euro) und der Union als Ganzes.Mit Beiträgen vonRobert Grzeszczak, Magdalena Gniadzik, Piotr Kwasiborski, Jędrzej Maśnicki, Artur Nowak-Far, Paweł Wojciechowski

The subject of the book is of great importance from the point of view of the current situation in Europe. The purpose of the book is to identify the legal effects of the renationalisation process on the EU and its Member States. The concept of renationalisation is expressed through MS's aim to verify the relationship with the EU. The thesis for the book is the return of renationalisation tendencies in the area of the Single Market, which is supported by, among others, an open criticism of the foundations of EU integration or considerations on withdrawal from the EU by some MS and the problems caused by migration and immigration. Part of the book involved an analysis of the internal market freedoms give a clear indication of the effects of the continuing trend of renationalisation on consumers, workers, entrepreneurs and MS. A definite influence on the above is the new, more dynamic, competition between Member States for leadership in sectorial EU policies (eg energy or agriculture), in certain areas (the euro) and the Union as a whole. --

Cover -- The Challenge of Good Governance: An introduction -- References -- Part One: Change of the paradigms: From government to good governance? -- Chapter 1: Approaches to (good) governance in the European Union -- Introduction -- Good Governance: Evolution of a concept -- Governance in the EU: How good is it really? -- EU good governance and potential performance deficiencies -- Good governance and democratic legitimacy -- Exporting Good Governance? -- Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 2: Good Governance and Public Administration -- Conclusions and recommendations -- References

Annotation

The introduction of better regulation principles had its origins in the desire for better European governance and for anchoring sustainable development in the Union's policymaking by looking at economic, social and environmental impacts together. Better regulation is about professionalising every aspect of policy-making and keeping it fit for today's world. Better regulation is also about considering alternative ways to achieve results since legislation should never be an end in itself. Actions at the EU level should always add value compared with what can be done at national, regional or local level. The main reason for taking up the subject is the observation that the tendencies to regulate the particular market sectors in greater and greater detail are increasing. The obvious reason for that phenomenon is such that the consequences of the financial crisis of the last decade are still felt and that the crisis itself has revealed many threats. The paper begins with a short discussion about research methodologies, terminology and definitions employed in the course of the study. These considerations are followed by general - practical and systemic deliberations on the notion "better regulation principles". The reconstruction of the "better regulation" in the EU system in terms of its subjects and functions constitutes the pivot of the next part of the paper and, from now on, the analysis of European Union's Better Regulation agenda. Subsequently, the paper focuses on the examples of different forms of Initiatives to improve the legislative environment in the EU and its Member States. The paper concludes with general remarks

The issue of re-nationalization (disintegration and fragmentation) of integration process is manifested by the will of some of the Member States to verify their relations with the European Union. In the age of an economic crisis of the EU and in relation to the large migration of the population, there has emerged strong social and political criticism, on the European level, of the integration process, with some Member States even consideringtheir withdrawal from the EU. In those States, demands forextending the Member States' competences in the field of some EU policies are becoming more and more popular. The legal effects of the above-mentioned processes are visible in the free movements of the internal market, mainly within the free movement of persons. Therefore, there are problems, such as increased social dumping process, the need to retain the output of the European labour law, the issue of the so-called social tourism, erosion of the meaning of the EU citizenship and the principle of equal treatment.

The issue of re-nationalization (disintegration and fragmentation) of integration process is manifested by the will of some of the Member States to verify their relations with the European Union. In the age of an economic crisis of the EU and in relation to the large migration of the population, there has emerged strong social and political criticism, on the European level, of the integration process, with some Member States even consideringtheir withdrawal from the EU. In those States, demands forextending the Member States' competences in the field of some EU policies are becoming more and more popular. The legal effects of the above-mentioned processes are visible in the free movements of the internal market, mainly within the free movement of persons. Therefore, there are problems, such as increased social dumping process, the need to retain the output of the European labour law, the issue of the so-called social tourism, erosion of the meaning of the EU citizenship and the principle of equal treatment. ; The issue of re-nationalization (disintegration and fragmentation) of integration process is manifested by the will of some of the Member States to verify their relations with the European Union. In the age of an economic crisis of the EU and in relation to the large migration of the population, there has emerged strong social and political criticism, on the European level, of the integration process, with some Member States even consideringtheir withdrawal from the EU. In those States, demands forextending the Member States' competences in the field of some EU policies are becoming more and more popular. The legal effects of the above-mentioned processes are visible in the free movements of the internal market, mainly within the free movement of persons. Therefore, there are problems, such as increased social dumping process, the need to retain the output of the European labour law, the issue of the so-called social tourism, erosion of the meaning of the EU citizenship and the principle of equal treatment.