Suchergebnisse

The article deals with one of the eternal themes of Russian society and the state - Russia between the West and the East. This problem determines the choice of orientation of domestic and foreign policy, and also determines the "swing" of the Russian political vector. The author notes that the geopolitical position of Russia (at the junction of the West and the East) contributed to the formation of different directions of social and political thought, which played a significant role in the development and implementation of the internal - and foreign policy vector of Russian society and state. The author concentrates on the understanding of the zigzags of modern Russian politics - from the pro-Western course in the early 1990s, which was replaced by a multi-vector approach from the 2000s, analyzing the reasons that influenced the choice of one or another course of development of the country, as well as its change. It is argued that the vision of the future of the Russian Federation, which broadcasts the modern liberal opposition, does not meet the needs, needs of the majority of the population, its national interests, sociocultural traditions, and the ill-considered reforms of the 1990s that had disastrous consequences did not contribute to sup-porting this course. As a result, since the 2000s, the policy of modern Russia has been characterized by a multivector approach and attempts to consolidate the status of an independent center of power, based on the principles of civilizational identity and originality.

This article addresses the development and survival of civilization in a global political context. Your attention to the author focuses on the problems of the current stage of globalization, the core of which has been made of the values of the West, and the concepts of the researchers there studied as a response to the "challenge" version of the neo-liberal globalization on the modalities for the further development of the world and Russia's place in the new reality of the socio-political processes of the political world. The author defends the position of the "response" on the part of Russia to the modern challenges of the global world from the considerations of colored alternatives at the national level in the development of civilizational and political processes in the global space. Russia's political development represents a constant overcoming of"challenges". This is still relevant today. The multivariance of the ways of evolution of peoples and states is argued on the basis of the work of Russian researchers both at the beginning of the XX century and in the XXI century. The future of the world in the Twenty-First Century must provide for a new development strategy based on dialogism.