Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Overview -- Contents -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 Hypothesis -- 1.2 Background to the Problem -- 1.3 Aim and Importance of the Book -- 1.4 Scope of the Book -- 1.5 Methodology -- Chapter 2: Long-Term Contracts and Relational Contracts -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Long-Term Contracts and Relational Contracts in General -- 2.2.1 Long-Term Contract -- 2.2.1.1 What Is a Long-Term Contract? -- 2.2.1.2 Characteristics of a Long-Term Contract -- 2.2.1.3 Why Long-Term Contracts? -- 2.2.1.4 Issues Relating to Long-Term Contracts -- 2.2.2 Relational Contracts -- 2.2.2.1 Meaning of a Relational Contract -- 2.2.2.2 Characteristics of a Relational Contract -- 2.2.2.3 The Relationship Between Long-Term Contracts and Relational Contracts -- 2.2.2.4 Why Is the Relational Contract Theory More Appropriate? -- 2.2.2.5 Relational Contract Theory in Hardship Cases -- 2.3 Long-Term Contracts in the UNIDROIT Principles -- 2.3.1 'Definition' of a Long-Term Contract -- 2.3.2 Scope of Application -- 2.3.3 Rules Relating to Long-Term Contracts -- 2.4 Long-Term Relational Supply Contracts -- 2.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 3: Hardship Rules in Domestic Laws and International Instruments -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Force Majeure and Hardship -- 3.3 Hardship Rules in Domestic Laws -- 3.3.1 Hardship Rules in Civil Law -- 3.3.1.1 German Law -- 3.3.1.2 French Law -- 3.3.2 Hardship Rules in Common Law -- 3.3.2.1 English Law -- 3.3.2.2 Australian Law -- 3.3.2.3 American Law -- 3.4 Hardship Rules Under the CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles -- 3.4.1 Hardship Rules Under the CISG -- 3.4.1.1 International Interpretation of "Impediment" -- 3.4.1.2 Article 79 and Hardship -- 3.4.2 Hardship Rules Under the UNIDROIT Principles -- 3.4.2.1 Hardship Rules as an Exception -- 3.4.2.2 Definition of Hardship -- 3.4.2.3 Elements of Hardship.

1. Introducation -- 2. Cisg and unification of international sales law -- 3.Legal interpretation and uniform interpretation of cisg -- 4.Gap-filling and the uniform interpretation of cisg -- 5. supplemental materials and the uniform interpretation of cisg -- 6.Conclusion.

1. Xiaojun Chen -- 2. Xiaojun Chen -- 3. Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 4. Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 5. Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 6.Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 7.Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 8. Wenjing An -- 9. Wenjing An -- 10. Wenjing An -- 11. Wenjing An -- 12. Luo Jie -- 13. Luo Jie -- 14.Luo Jie -- 15. Haicong Zuo -- 16. Haicong Zuo -- 17. Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 18. Peng Guo Shu Zhang Chaolin Zhang -- 19. Shu Zhang, Geng Wang -- 20. Shu Zhang, Geng Wang -- 21. Shao Long -- 22. Shao Long -- 23. Shao Long -- 24. Siying Wu Dentons -- 25. Siying Wu Dentons -- 26. Shao Long -- 27. Shao Long -- 28. Shao Long -- 29 -- Shao Long -- 30. Junmin Zhang -- 31. Junmin Zhang -- 32. Junmin Zhang -- 33. Shaotang Wang -- 34. Bruno Zeller -- 35. Bruno Zeller -- 36. Caishun Guo -- 37. Caishun Guo -- 38. Caishun Guo -- 39. Caishun Guo -- 40. Xiaojun Chen -- 41. Xiaojun Chen -- 42. Xiaojun Chen -- 43. Xiaojun Chen -- 44. Yueshan Liu -- 45. Yueshan Liu -- 46. Yueshan Liu -- 47. Kaiwei Cui -- 48. Kaiwei Cui -- 49. Jia Li -- 50. Jia Li -- 51. Yueyi Yang -- 52. Yueyi Yang -- 53. Hongzhi Hu -- 54. Hongzhi Hu.

Chapter 1. Mengsha Yang Tianjin University -- Chapter 2. Mengsha Yang Tianjin University -- Chapter 3. Mengsha Yang Tianjin University -- Chapter 4. Xiaoying Fan Tianjin University of Finance and Economics -- Chapter 5. Xiaoying Fan Tianjin University of Finance and Economics -- Chapter 6. Xiaoying Fan Tianjin University of Finance and Economics -- Chapter 7. Xiaoying Fan Tianjin University of Finance and Economics -- Chapter 8. Wenjing An North China Electric Power University -- Chapter 9. Wenjing An North China Electric Power University -- Chapter 10. Wenjing An North China Electric Power University -- Chapter 11. Wenjing An North China Electric Power University -- Chapter 12. Luo Jie Zhongnan University of Economics and Law -- Chapter 13. Luo Jie Zhongnan University of Economics and Law -- Chapter 14. Luo Jie Zhongnan University of Economics and Law -- Chapter 15. Haicong Zuo, UIBC -- Chapter 16. Haicong Zuo, UIBC -- Chapter 17. Peng Guo, Geng Wang RMIT/UIBC -- Chapter 18. Peng Guo, Geng Wang RMIT/UIBC -- Chapter 19. Shu Zhang, Geng Wang Deakin/UIBC -- Chapter 20. Shu Zhang, Geng Wang Deakin/UIBC -- Chapter 21. Zaiyu Guo, Peng Guo Supreme People's Court / RMIT -- Chapter 22. Zaiyu Guo, Peng Guo Supreme People's Court / RMIT -- Chapter 23. Siying Wu Dentons -- Chapter 24. Siying Wu Dentons -- Chapter 25. Siying Wu Dentons -- Chapter 26. Chaolin Zhang Nankai University -- Chapter 27. Chaolin Zhang Nankai University -- Chapter 28. Chaolin Zhang Nankai University -- Chapter 29. Chaolin Zhang Nankai University -- Chapter 30. Li Sun Civil Aviation University of China -- Chapter 31. Li Sun Civil Aviation University of China -- Chapter 32. Li Sun Civil Aviation University of China -- Chapter 33. Shaotang Wang, Nankai University -- Chapter 34 -- Shaotang Wang, Nankai University -- Chapter 35. Shaotang Wang, Nankai University -- Chapter 36. Xiaochuan Weng, UNSW -- Chapter 37. Xiaochuan Weng, UNSW -- Chapter 38. Xiaochuan Weng, UNSW -- Chapter 39. Xiaochuan Weng, UNSW -- Chapter 40. Xiaojun Chen, Wincon Law Firm -- Chapter 41. Xiaojun Chen, Wincon Law Firm -- Chapter 42. Xiaojun Chen, Wincon Law Firm -- Chapter 43. Xiaojun Chen, Wincon Law Firm -- Chapter 44. Peng Wang, Nankai University -- Chapter 45. Peng Wang, Nankai University -- Chapter 46. Peng Wang, Nankai University.

Chapter 1. Novelact (Resources) Limited v Xiamen Special Economic Zone International Trade Trust Company -- Chapter 2. Sanmei (Japan) Trading Co., Ltd v Fujian Zhangzhou Metals & Minerals Import and Export Co., Ltd -- Chapter 3. Skandinaviska Metemo AB v Hunan Co. for International Economy and Trade -- Chapter 4. Xiamen Special Economic Zone Youli Trading Co., Ltd v Hungary Gold Star International Trading Co., Ltd -- Chapter 5. Hang TAT Food USA Inc. v Rizhao Aquatic Products Group and Rizhao Rirong Aquatic Products Co. Ltd -- Chapter 6. China Yituo Group Company v Germany Gerhard Freyso Ltd GmbH & Co. KG -- Chapter 7. Netherlands Akfam Co., Ltd v Sinochem Hainan Co., Ltd -- Chapter 8. Tunghang (Asia) Co., Ltd v Shenzhen Haizhongbao Aquatic Products Trading Co., Ltd -- Chapter 9. Hong Kong Zhenghongli Co., Ltd. v Switzerland Gilbert Finance Co., Ltd -- Chapter 10. Lianhe Enterprise (US) Ltd v Yantai Branch of Shandong Foreign Trade Co -- Chapter 11. Singapore Daguangxing (Private) Co., Ltd v Jiangsu Machinery Import and Export Group Co., Ltd -- Chapter 12. Shenzhen Fengshen Industrial Development Co., Ltd v France Eurasian International Technology Development Co., Ltd -- Chapter 13. Nanjing Supplies Industrial Group Company v. Tian'an Insurance Co. Nanjing Branch -- Chapter 14. Shanghai Weijie Electronic Devices Ltd v Superpower Supply Inc -- Chapter 15. Swiss Mirimet Company v Henan Native Products Import and Export Corporation -- Chapter 16. Japanese Taiping Trading Co., Ltd v Jiangsu Sainty International Group Garment Import and Export Nantong Co., Ltd -- Chapter 17. Carl Hill v Cixi Old Furniture Trading Co., Ltd -- Chapter 18. Shanghai Dongda Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v German Laubholz-Meyer GmbH -- Chapter 19. Sino-Add (Singapore)Pty Ltd v Karawasha Resources Ltd -- Chapter 20. Shanghai Shenhe Import and Export Co., Ltd v Itochu Commercial Co., Ltd of Japan -- Chapter 21. Japanese Xinsheng Trade Company v Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Nihong Metallurgic Product Company -- Chapter 22. Wuhan Zhongou Clothes Factory v Hungary Wanlong International Trade Company -- Chapter 23. China Packaging Import and Export Hubei Company v. Phoenix Company Limited -- Chapter 24. Hyundai Corporation of Korea v Hubei Metals and Minerals Import and Export Company -- Chapter 25. Resource Engineering Co., Ltd. v Qing Li, Ming Sun and Shanghai Donglin International Trade Co., Ltd -- Chapter 26. Dong Feng Trade Co. Ltd v Hangzhou Dongli Rubber and Plastic Products Co., Ltd -- Chapter 27. Zhuguang Petroleum Co., Ltd. v Wuxi Joyray Import and Export (Group) Co., Ltd. -- Chapter 28. Wuhan Yinfeng Data Network Co., Ltd. et al. v Ming Xu, China Electronics Import and Export (Wuhan) Corporation et al -- Chapter 29. Wang Ruixiang Fashion Co., Ltd. v. Trend Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Silk (Group) Co., Ltd -- Chapter 30. A (Singapore) Limited v Dongling Trading Co., Ltd; Liquidation Team of Shanghai Xuyang Trading Co., Ltd -- Chapter 31. Shunde Westband Furniture Co., Ltd v. PANDA INC LIMITED -- Chapter 32. ACETO Corporation v. Suzhou Lintong Electronic Technology Company -- Chapter 33. Sinochem Shanghai Co. v. Kolorit TM Co. Ltd.Dispute Arising from a Sale of Goods Contract -- Chapter 34. Shanghai Donglin International Trade Co. Ltd v Johnson Trading Australia Pty Ltd -- Chapter 35. Xi'an Yunchang Trading Co., Ltd v Wentong Yuan & American Antai International Co -- Chapter 36. Baodeli Co., Ltd v Ceiec (Guangdong) -- Chapter 37. The Aterlight Electronic Control & Audio Systems Limited v. The Liquidating Group of Zhuhai Zhongyue New Communication Technology Co., Ltd., etc -- Chapter 38. China Changzhou Kairui Weaving and Printing Company v Taiwan Junlong Machinery Company -- Chapter 39. Qingdao Benefim Trading Co.,Ltd. v Sinochem International FZE -- Chapter 40. Norway Royal Supreme Seafoods v Rizhao Jixiang Ocean Food Co., Ltd & China Rizhao Shanfu Food Co., Ltd -- Chapter 41. WS China Import GmbH v. Longkou Guanyuan Food Company -- Chapter 42. Yiwu Majiali Import & Export Co., Ltd v Y & Q International Trade (Group), Inc -- Chapter 43. Vishaybc Components Beyschlag Gmbh v Shanghai Y.Hsu Trading Co., Ltd -- Chapter 44. Skalli Corporation v. Shanghai Tongya Liquor Co Ltd – Dispute Arising from a Sale of Goods Contract -- Chapter 45. Shanghai Shanshan Ruiyuan Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd v Lanificio Ing Loro Piana & C S P A Italy -- Chapter 46. CITIC International Business & Trading Co., Ltd v Hokusan Co., Ltd -- Chapter 47. Shanghai Lianfu Food Co. Ltd. v. CSM N. V. – Dispute Arising from a Sale of Goods Contract -- Chapter 48. Possehl(Hk) Ltd v China Metals and Minerals Import and Export(Shenzhen) Corporation. .

PurposeThis study aims to specify whether heterogeneous reference-point-based aspirations are related to the cooperation levels of R&D alliance portfolios in a positive or negative (or nonlinear) way, and to unveil how cooperative behaviors evolve in recurrent project cooperation.Design/methodology/approachThis study establishes a network containing a cooperation subnetwork and a project subnetwork based on patent data in the "deep learning" field to investigate how cooperative behaviors evolve in R&D alliance portfolios. A model of evolutionary games on complex networks is constructed to gain insight into the dynamic evolution of DMs' strategies.FindingsFirst, the heterogeneous aspirations of DMs can improve the cooperation level in R&D alliance portfolios. Second, compared to prudent DMs, aggressive DMs are more likely to choose the cooperation strategy, implying that an appropriate aspiration level nurtures cooperative R&D endeavors with partners. Third, the effects of effort complementarity, knowledge reorganization capabilities and cooperation supervision on cooperation are contingent on the distribution of DMs' aspiration types.Practical implicationsPolicymakers should identify aspiration types of DMs when screening partners. They can encourage partners to focus more on historical payoffs and establish relatively higher aspiration levels to improve the cooperation level. Developing highly detailed contracts becomes crucial when cooperating with firms that possess extensive knowledge reorganization capabilities.Originality/valueThis work contributes a theoretical framework for investigating cooperation in R&D alliance portfolios through the lens of evolutionary games on complex networks, thus revealing the effects of heterogeneous reference-point-based aspirations of DMs on R&D cooperation.

Public–private partnership is a type of cooperation that has been widely employed to alleviate contradictions between supply and demand in the elderly care industry in China. Based on evolutionary game theory, this paper mainly analyzes the effects of static subsidy and dynamic subsidy to private sectors and consumers on the evolution of the decision process for private investors, consumers, and government in the three-dimension system. The simulation results show that without active supervision, a higher subsidy to private sectors will not promote the provision of high-quality services when the cost saving is large. Furthermore, there exists a threshold value of the difference between the two types of subsidies such that elderly people will be encouraged to choose institutional care if the value exceeds the threshold. We also find that dynamic subsidy policy works more efficiently in promoting the provision of home-based care services.