Suchergebnisse

First-person narratives are meaning-making devices that can be used as powerful tools to direct developmental changes. For young people who have endured difficulties in their lives, the selection and configuration of such experiences may contribute in significant ways to how they come to understand themselves and what possibilities they hold. Repeated interviews with young people living in residential homes provided by Child Protection Services have demonstrated how the young people give accounts of their past and present as well as their future prospects. Some tell stories that speak of how things have turned out well despite everything that has troubled them. The hindrances to their development are turned around and adversity is spoken of as something from which they have benefitted. Others dwell on how things might have been better if only previous conditions had been otherwise. They get "stuck" because the things that could have made a difference belong to the past. The exploration of narrative configurations in the format of "Despite all" and "If only" may illuminate how personal accounts of events have significance in terms of subjectivation and further development. The configuration of self-narratives offers alternative understanding of how out- of-home placement sometimes fails as a measure to support development and how some young people manage despite adversity.

A significant proportion of parents in mediation present destructive and escalating conflicts. In a naturalistic study of sessions with high‐conflict couples, we observed dialogues with frequent interruptions, rapidly shifting subjects, and emotional attacks. A systematic search revealed eight distinct sources of conflict that interfered with the mediation process: Two related to the breakup, four regarding differing concerns of care for the child, and two mainly about the contextual conditions for childcare arrangements. The article describes these sources of conflicts in a format that could increase the capacity of mediators to recognize and address them during the process of mediation.

In a study of 154 couples in precourt mandatory mediation in Norway, a majority of the thirty‐eight high‐conflict (HC) cases left the mediation after two sessions and without any agreements. Eighteen months later, five of ten HC couples were still without an agreement. With seven sessions available free of charge, the mediation system seems to fail at helping the HC cases. The authors discuss some of the challenges that are attached to a mandatory mediation system. One explanation seems to be the attempt to fulfill several ambitions with the same intervention. Some ideas for improvement of the system are introduced.

Systematic analyses of initiatives and responses from mediators working with parents in intense conflicts about child custody and care brought forward variations in effective strategies. The findings are presented along six dimensions: The topics that were addressed, how the agenda for the sessions was decided, focus on agreement vs relational topics, oral vs written orientation, limited vs generous time, and parental vs system focus. Effective mediators handled these dimensions with flexibility, recognized and validated both parents' perspectives, accepted and explored differences, differentiated topics, focused on relational issues when needed, tracked the process by written summaries, and encouraged testing solutions.

$uTeoretiske tvetydigheter / Runa Haukaa -- Offentliggjøring av familien / Helga Maria Hernes -- Kvinneperspektiv på arbeidersolidariteten / Marit Hoel -- Kvinners rett til penger / Tove Stang Dahl -- Tilbakeblikk og sideblikk på begrepet kvinnekultur / Berit Ås -- Det verdifulle patriarkatet / Øystein Gullvåg Holter -- Makt og kjærlighet i ekteskapet / Hanne Haavind -- Harriet Holter i samtale med Bjørg Aase Sørensen og Hildur Ve