The emergence of pensioners' parties in Eastern Europe: a comparative analysis
In: Studies in public policy 449
71 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Studies in public policy 449
In: BASEES/Routledge series on Russian and East European studies, 35
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 98, Heft 1, S. 193-195
ISSN: 2222-4327
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 97, Heft 3, S. 593-595
ISSN: 2222-4327
In: East European politics and societies: EEPS, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 78-100
ISSN: 1533-8371
The creation of technocratic caretaker governments in several European countries in the wake of the Great Recession (2008–2009) and the Eurozone crisis led to renewed academic interest in such administrations. Although such governments are often assumed to be illegitimate and democratically dysfunctional, there has been little empirical consideration of if and how they legitimate themselves to mass publics. This question is particularly acute given that, empirically, caretaker technocrat-led administrations have been clustered in newer, more crisis-prone democracies in Southern and Eastern Europe where high levels of state exploitation by parties suggest a weak basis for any government claiming technocratic impartiality. This article uses Michael Saward's "representative claims" framework to re-examine the case of one of Europe's longer-lasting and most popular technocratic administrations, the 2009–2010 Fischer government in the Czech Republic. The article maps representative claims made for Fischer and his government, as well as counterclaims. Claims drew on the electoral mandate of sponsoring parties, the government's claimed technocratic neutrality, and on Fischer's "mirroring" of the values and lifestyle of ordinary Czechs (echoing some populist framings of politics). The article argues that the Fischer government benefited from multiple overlapping representative claims, but notes the need for robust methodology to assess the reception claims by their intended constituency. It concludes by considering the implications of actors' ability to combine populist and technocratic claims, noting similarities in technocratic governments and some types of anti-establishment party.
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 95, Heft 4, S. 792-796
ISSN: 2222-4327
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 23, Heft 6, S. 860-861
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 95, Heft 3, S. 587-589
ISSN: 2222-4327
In: Political studies review, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 116-116
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 300-323
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: Politologický časopis, Heft 3
The paper discusses the state of Czech democracy and current research agendas on democracy in the Czech Republic, focusing in particular on the role of political parties. It considers Czech democracy both in relation to Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and in the light of the evolving relationship between CEE and Western Europe. It suggests that current CEE states such as the Czech Republic gradually approximating to models of West European-style party politics may need rethinking. It then examines democracy in the Czech Republic in relation to debates on democratic "backsliding", arguing that in the Czech cases the principal "backsliding" risks lie less in the rise of authoritarian populists than a potential crisis of democratic representation driven by perceptions of corruption. The paper concludes with some suggestions about future avenues for research on Czech and CEE democracy.
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 65, Heft 1, S. 45-74
ISSN: 1465-3427
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 5, S. 793-795
ISSN: 1460-3683