Suchergebnisse

A broad outline of the main elements of the Norwegian local tax system is first given. This is followed by a discussion of some of the changes that have taken place in the relative distribution of various sources of local revenue since the mid-seventies. It is shown that although local government's share of total national income tax revenues has increased over recent years, such taxes have decreased as a proportion of total local revenues. This relative decline in the importance of local income taxes has been compensated, in particular, by increases in state grants. Thus, whereas in 1977 taxes accounted for 53% of total local current revenues, by 1982 this proportion had dropped to 47%. Over the same period, central government grants increased from 31% to 35% of current revenues. It is also shown that fees and charges are becoming increasingly important as sources of local revenues. These relative changes in the composition of local revenues have not been uniform across all municipalities. Whereas the larger cities were subject to real cutbacks in tax revenues, taxes continued to increase in the smallest and most peripheral municipalities, despite a government decision in 1978 to lower the maximum local tax rate. Overall, it is suggested that the long-term effect of the policy of central government, as regards local revenues, has been to bring about a rather massive redistribution of revenues, solely benefitting the smallest and already the most well-off municipalities.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO TEST A SERIES OF PROPOSITIONS ABOUT BUDGETARY DECISION MAKING, IN THE FORM OF LINEAR DECISION MODELS, FOR THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF OSLO, NORWAY AND TO ASSESS THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR THE LONG-TERM GROWTH OF AGENCY ACTIVITIES. RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE ACQUISITIVENESS OF THE STRATEGY IS AN IMPORTANT DETERMINANT OF GROWTH.