This study on the implementation of the K1 and K2 hiring policy be employess in the province of Central Java. Goals to be achieved is to obtain material and data in the framework proposed procurement policy reformulation civil servant particularly from temporary employees. The experiment was conducted by using the approach of law (statutory approach) and approaches the case (case approach). Using primary data and secondary data more emphasis on objectivity and honesty are realized by explaining the purpose of research to the informant. Additionally secret informant's identity, so that the consequences of the results of this study do not affect the informant who had provided information. The results showed that in the province of Central Java, in the implementation of procurement policies as a problem-solving contractual government empolyee called K1 and K2, beginning with data collection activities, socialization PP 48/2005 jo. PP 43/2007 and its implementation visible to the interaction between institutions or organizations framers with relevant agencies. Interactions can be coordination (coordination meetings), commands / instructions (circulars, technical instructions). Institutionalization and setting honorary workers in Central Java environment problematic minimal because of the following 4 things, (i) Legality officials who appoint honorary varied; (ii) payroll funding not only from the state budget / budget but also from other revenue;(iii) The place of work is not in government agencies but are appointed by the competent authority salary from the state budget / budget; and (iv) A lot of temporary employees who do not meet the provisions of Regulation on age and years of service. To that end, the future recruitment area honorarium need for precise criteria for the task or work performed by a local temporary employees. To be able to make improvements in the planning area management strategies honorary staff, need to know thoroughly the patterns in which the planning strategies in making decisions and actions must be in accordance with the plan to do.
AbstractThis research aims to depth evaluate about Corruption Eradication Act that is used to handle banking crimes either in government or private banks including felony and misuse authority in other banking sec- tors. Besides that, it is also to find kind of efforts that need to be executed in overcome infraction and felony that happen in banks (private or government) referred to Act Number 10 of 1998. This research method uses normative legal approach and sociological legal approach, and it is shown in diagnostic and prescriptive shapes. The data uses primary and secondary data that in primary data is acquired by having depth interview and in secondary data is obtained by having literature study. The data analysis uses tech- nique of interactive analysis and the result shows that the reason of Corruption Act is utilized in finishing banking crime cases and liability system by using strict liability and vicourius liability in proving institution's mistakes are diversion liability and flawless liability. The liability principle in Corruption Act is vast in the same manner as stated in Article 20 Act Number 31 jo Act Number 21 of 2001, that are sanction pro- nouncement system in Corruption Act is flexible and varied counterattraction punishment; responsibility for the doer either in trial, assistance, and wicked conciliation; reversed authentication. Kind of efforts that should be done in taking in hand of banking infraction and felony are broaden criminal action forms; type of sanction and liability. Banking crimes are extraordinary crimes so there shall be reversed authentication to support easier authentication. Revised upon Act Number 10 of 1998 are from aspect of criminalization action, type of sanction, corporate's liability and reversed authentication in order to effective Banking Act implementation and ward off banking infraction and felony either in private or government bank.Key words: banking crimes, corruption crimes.AbstrakTujuan penelitian mengkaji secara mendalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi untuk menangani tindak pidana bidang perbankan baik yang terjadi di Bank BUMN maupun swasta, serta penyalahgunaan wewenang dan kejahatan perbankan yang lain. Selain itu akan dikaji upaya-upaya yang seharusnya dilakukan agar UU No. 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan mampu mengatasi kejahatan dan pelanggaran yang terjadi di Bank BUMN maupun Bank Swasta dan kejahatan di bidang perbankan lainnya. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan ialah \endekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis sosiologis. Bentuk penelitian ini adalah diagnostik dan preskriptip Data berupa data primer dan sekunder. Data primer diperoleh dengan cara wawancara mendalam, data sekunder diperolah melaui studi kepustakaan. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa alasan Undang- Undang TIPIKOR digunakan untuk menyelesaiakan kasus-kasus tindak pidana perbankan, sistem pertanggungjawaban untuk membuktikan adanya kesalahan pada badan hukum menggunakan konsep strict liability dan vicourius liability, yaitu sistem pertanggungjawaban tanpa kesalahan dan pengalihan pertanggungjawaban. Prinsip pertanggungjawaban dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi sangat luas sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 20 UU No.31 Jo UU No.21 Tahu 2001 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sistem penjatuhan sanksi dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi sangat fleksibel, jenis pidana tambahan sangat variatif. Diaturnya beban tanggungjawab bagi si pembuat percobaan, pembantuan dan permufakatan jahat dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Diaturnya beban pembuktian terbalik. Upaya yang harus dilakukan agar UU No.10 Tahun 1998 dapat mengatasi kejahatan dan pelanggaran di bidang perbankan yaitu, memperluas formulasi perbuatan pidna, jenis sanksi dan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Mengingat kejahatan di bidang perbankan merupakan exstra ordinary crimes, maka untuk memudahkan pembuktian harus diterapkan sistem pembuktian terbalik. Saran harus dilakukan perubahan/revisi terhadap substansi UU No. 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan, baik dari aspek kriminalisasi perbuatan, jenis sanksi, sistem pertanggungjawaban terhadap korporasi, dan sistem pembuktian terbalik, agar Undang-Undang Perbankan dapat diterapkan secara efektif, dan dapat menanggulangi kejahatan dan pelanggaran perbankan baik yang terjadi di bank BUMN maupu bank swasta dan kejahatan perbankan lainnya.Kata kunci : Tindak Pidana Perbankan, Tindak Pidana Korupsi
This study aims to determine the legal protection of victims of child trafficking in the provision of compensation and restitution rights. Legal protection for victims one of them provides the right of compensation and restitution as a form of distribution of justice for the victims. The existence of the Law relating to the provision of compensation and restitution to the victims has provided the rule for legal protection, but the implementation of compensation and restitution to victims of trafficking in child trafficking is still not widely applied and felt. This research is a normative legal research or legal literature research that is prescriptive or applied and obtained through study. Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded that there are some problems arising in the implementation of mechanism to get the right of compensation and restitution for victims of child trafficking crime. These issues are not only about the rules, but also of institutions authorized to assist victims of trafficking in children in obtaining their right of compensation and restitution.
The existence of ancient and cultural conservation objects are prone to damage, loss, and ruin. It is caused by either natural factor or the human' behavior. Law enforcement against the criminals who intentionally not reporting the object presumed as Cultural Conservation Object on the Decision of the District Court of Mojokerto number: 52/Pid.Sus/2018/PN. Mjk which state that the defendant, Fendi Andriyanto Bin Badri, has been legally and conclusively proved guilty by committing crime for "intentionally not to report the findings that is presumed as a cultural conservation object and because of it, the judge sentences the defendant with 7 (seven) month of imprisonment and Rp.1000.000,- (one million rupiahs) penalty and if that penalty is not paid, it shall be substituted with 2 (two) months of imprisonment. This study was classified as a normative legal study by employing primary and the secondary data obtained from literature study. Based on the findings of the study, the basis of the judge' consideration in subjecting the penalty was based on the aspect of certainty, fairness, and benefits of law based on the evidence materials proposed in trial, the witness' testimony, the defendant' testimony, the expert information, trial fact, and all the lightening and burdening things.
Money laundering is an attempt to conceal or disguise the origins of assets acquired from a crime. Money laundering is a follow-up crime because it is followed by a criminal act, one of which is a systematic and organized criminal act of corruption, law enforcement process is not easy. One effective way of preventing and combating money laundering and corruption can be done by follow the money approach. Follow the money approach can reveal who the perpetrator, the type of crime, place and amount of hidden. Then in addition to perpetrators remain criminally charged, state financial loss recovery efforts can also be achieved. The result of t research shows the obstacles implementation of follow the money is derived from the substance element that is conflicting interpretation of Article 77 and Article 69 of Law on TPPU, the element of legal structure namely the lack of good cooperation among law enforcers, as well as the legal culture element, is the low participation of the society against the legal compliance of the criminal act of washing money especially the approach of follow the money.
AbstractThis article aims to analyze the reformulation of corporate criminal responsibility in Indonesia by reviewing the legislation and court rulings as a reference, in a corporate crime not yet the custom of the public prosecutor or court to explore aspects of corporate crime and or ensnare the intellectual perpetrator in corporate crime, in the principle of a criminal act involving a corporation of criminal prosecution can be done, but it is almost never done, so that the process of law enforcement in a corporate crime is committed by committing a general crime, even though the crime of the company is a special crime which must also be dealt with in a special way. The results of this study have not implemented the concept of corporate crime by law enforcement, so that the perpetrators of the corporation avoid the deterrent effect, especially the perpetrators of intellectuals and corporations. This study uses the normative method by reviewing the Law with the help of secondary legal materials in the form of court decisions and other legal doctrines, using deductive and prescriptive analysis. The results show that law enforcers have not been able to enforce the law in relation to criminal offenses involving corporations, corporations that should be trapped with corporate crime are rarely snared because of incomprehension of public prosecutors in the construction of criminal law theory in corporate criminal concepts which has become prevalent in many countries today in both common law and civil law countries.Keywords: Reformulation; Criminal liability; Corporations.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan menganalisis reformulasi pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan di Indonesia dengan meninjau kembali aturan Perundang-undangan dan Putusan pengadilan sebagai acuan, dalam tindak pidana korporasi belum menjadi kebiasaan jaksa penuntut umum atau pengadilan untuk mengeksplorasi aspek kejahatan perusahaan dan atau menjerat pelaku intelektual dalam kejahatan korporasi, meski dalam prinsip tindak pidana yang melibatkan korporasi ...
Political parties are often in the spotlight because of the corrupt behavior of their members with the aim of party interests. The forms of criminal acts of corruption by cadres or political party administrators have various modes, including bribery, buying and selling positions, extorting strategic sectors, harming state finances, abuse of authority and misuse of budgets in development programs. Although there are many cases where political parties are suspected of being in the vortex of enjoying the proceeds of criminal acts of corruption, until now criminal responsibility is still borne by individuals, whether cadres or administrators of political parties. This study aims to provide an overview of the criminal liability arrangements of political parties in corruption in Indonesia and to conduct a comparative study of the accountability of political parties in Indonesia and South Korea. The research method used is non-doctrinal by taking secondary data sources with legal, conceptual and grammatical approaches. The results show that Indonesia still includes political parties as corporations, however, political parties in Indonesia are legal entities that cannot be held criminally responsible. South Korea is an example of a country that regulates criminal acts of political parties through their respective laws. In general, South Korea imposes criminal responsibility on persons or administrators of party members, not on the party itself.
AbstractThis paper discusses the abortion that can be done if there is an indication of medical emergency or pregnancy due to rape. Discriminalization of abortion regulated in Indonesian legislation is imbalanced and unfair in protecting the lives of its people, both children and women. This research is a prescriptive legal research with the approach of law and conceptual approach. Technique of collecting legal material of literature study and technique of legal material analysis using deduction method. The results of this paper conclude to ensure the safety and effective abortion practices. The law of abortion should impose and regulate abortion as a health care intervention, in which health, safety, and welfare are measures of legal legitimacy. This paper recommends the state to ensure the availability of clear, decisive and predictable rules. States should ensure the continuity and moral acceptability associated with legal certainty in a material way. Legal certainty should always be read as rule clarity, predictable, guaranteed continuity, and must be accepted or executed. Keywords: abortion, informed consent, contracted justice, patient. AbstrakTulisan ini membahas perihal aborsi yang dapat dilakukan jika terjadi indikasi kedaruratan medis atau kehamilan akibat perkosaan. Diskriminalisasi aborsi yang diatur dalam perundang-undangan Indonesia tidak seimbang dan tidak adil dalam melindungi kehidupan masyarakatnya baik anak, maupun perempuan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskiptif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum studi pustaka dan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode deduksi. Hasil tulisan ini menyimpulkan untuk memastikan keamanan dan praktik aborsi yang efektif. Hukum aborsi harus memberlakukan dan mengatur aborsi sebagai intervensi perawatan kesehatan, di mana kesehatan, keselamatan, dan kesejahteraan merupakan langkah-langkah legitimasi hukum. Tulisan ini merekomendasikan pada negara untuk menjamin ketersediaan ...
Negara Indonesia merupakan negara demokrasi ditandai dengan banyaknya partai politik yang memegang peran penting didalamnya yang artinya proses rekruitmen pejabat publik melibatkan partai politik, dapat dimaknai partai politik merupakan satu-satunya sarana mencapai kekuasaan sehingga Tindak pidana korupsi berkorelasi langsung dengan kedudukan partai politik, politisi dan birokrasi. Penegakan hukum terkait pertanggungjawaban pidana maupun administratif partai politik belum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nasional, sehingga selama ini yang diperkarakan hanya oknum partai politiknya saja, dilain sisi dapat kita ketahui bersama bahwa partai politik dapat dikatakan ikut menikmati hasil korupsi anggota partainya untuk mendanai kegiatan partai. Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai konstruksi ideal model pertanggungjawaban pidana yang efektif dan efisien terhadap partai politik sebagai badan hukum yang terbukti terlibat korupsi, dan pengaturan korupsi partai politik di masa mendatang dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional.
Corruption cases that result in small state financial losses continue to end up in the Corruption Court without alternative solutions that are faster, simpler and cheaper, even though the Corruption Court is located in the provincial capital and the corruption trial process requires a lot of money. So that it is not commensurate between the costs of law enforcement incurred with the state financial losses incurred due to corruption. The method of this research approach is juridical sociological because the problems studied concern the relationship between juridical factors and sociological factors. The urgency of discontinuing the prosecution of corruption crimes with small state financial losses is that the prosecution of corruption crimes with small state financial losses is inefficient and the Discontinuation of Prosecution of corruption crimes with small state financial losses does not have a legal umbrella This is because there are weaknesses in legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. The reconstruction model for the termination of prosecution of corruption crimes with small state financial losses based on Prosecutorial Discretion by the Public Prosecutor in a Progressive Legal Perspective is the Reconstruction of Legal Substance, namely adding Prosecutorial Discretion by the Public Prosecutor as a manifestation of the Dominus Litis Principle can stop the prosecution of corruption crimes with small state financial losses where this has not been regulated in Article 140 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Reconstruction of legal structure, namely the delegation of authority from the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia to the Head of the High Prosecutor's Office as the controller of the termination of prosecution of corruption crimes with small state financial losses, Reconstruction of legal culture, namely changing the patterns of thought of public prosecutors from positivistic to progressive in exercising their authority. The recommendations in this study encourage the reform of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) related to the authority to discontinue prosecution by the Public Prosecutor and the need to make a regulation of the Attorney General related to the Discontinuation of Prosecution based on the Discretion of the Public Prosecutor.