Suchergebnisse

This study aims to determine the relationship between board monitoring and audit fees with political connections as a moderating variable. This study uses 1,117 observations covering companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010-2018 except companies in the banking, financial sectors and companies that do not disclose audit fees in their report. This study uses multiple linear regression through STATA 14.0 software to test hypotheses. This study found that the board of commissioners monitoring and the board of directors monitoring have a significant positive relationship on audit fees, the existence of political connections in the company also gives a positive relationship on audit fees and strengthened the relationship between the board of commissioners monitoring and the board of directors monitoring on audit fees. This study is expected to inform stakeholders regarding board monitoring and political connections in audit fees paid by companies.

This study aims to determine the effect of company disclosure after the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 7 of 2012 and Minister of Finance Regulation No. 75/PMK.011/2012 on Indonesian mining companies. The data used in this study came from mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010-2014 with a total of 184 mining companies. The analysis technique used was multiple linear regression analysis with the help of STATA 14.0 software. Corporate Governance practices and ownership structure are variables that will be tested whether they will affect disclosure with control variables of size, ROA, and leverage. The results of the regression show that after the government regulation regarding mining companies, it can be seen that the variable of corporate governance practice and the variable of ownership structure have no influence on the amount of disclosure made by mining companies.

Research aims: This study examines the relationship between political connections and family ownership toward CSR activities disclosure.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed 624 Indonesian public companies on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) list for 2010-2018. The researchers used OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression by considering the fixed effect diversity of industry, year, and type of GRI to examine the relationship between political connections and family ownership on CSR disclosure.Research Findings: This study discovered that companies with political connections disclosed more CSR activities because they desired to bind themselves with the government, instruments of legacy, and social motivation. However, family firms were not found to have a significant relationship with CSR disclosure. In addition, the strong family ownership in the firm impacted the reduced strength of political connections, thereby reducing the company's CSR activities disclosure. Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study is interesting because the researchers combined the issue of the politically connected board and family firms, which are frequently found in the context of Indonesian companies. The researchers expect this study to enhance corporate board characteristics and CSR disclosure literature. Practically, the researchers expect this study could provide useful information for investors to make investment decisions. Furthermore, this study provides insight for regulators, who need a view of how political connections and family companies exist in responding to the regulations they set. Therefore, the existing regulations can be improved. Yet, this study was limited to the proxy of political connection based on local regulation of politically exposed person (PEP).

The aim of this study was to highlight the key finding of corporate politicalconnections research. This study used 61 previous studies related tocorporate political connections to develop a structured literature review. Itwas found that most studies were conducted in developing countries as theyprovided a unique institutional setting for conduct political connectionsresearch. In addition, a political connection is used as independentvariables and the previous studies focuses on three related topics, whichare corporate performance, corporate action, and loan and special rights.Literature review study become more important nowadays, as the numberof empirical quantitative research amount has been increased lately. Thisanalysis also has research and practical implementation for researcher,practitioners, and regulators.

AbstractThis paper examines the relationship between tenure diversity, corporate innovation, and carbon emission performance in developing countries, with a particular focus on the interaction model of corporate innovation in the nexus. The study is conducted in a unique setting of Indonesian firms with a high level of tenure diversity and carbon performance, excluding the financial industry from 2015 to 2021 and covering 1466 firm‐year observations. The study confirms that tenure diversity in the boardroom is a significant driver in reducing carbon emissions, as it has the potential to lower emissions during production cycles. However, the results suggest that there may be a poor decline in emissions when firms are too diverse. The authors' findings are robust and consistent over several robustness checks and endogeneity tests. This study is the first to focus on a quantitative measurement of carbon emission performance based on the Global Reporting Initiative in developing countries.

This study investigates the types and characteristics of firms with politically connected directors in the boards of the company. The study uses data from all firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange spanning from 2004 to 2006. This study employs univariate analyses to address the research questions. The finding shows that firms with political connections are prevalence in chemical, infrastructure, investment, and miscellaneous industry. Furthermore, firm size is the only variable which significantly affects the probability of being politically connected firms. Specifically, larger firms are more likely to be politically connected. This study implies that the size of the firms is an important determinant in establishing political connections in Indonesia.