Suchergebnisse

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the influence of audit committee characteristics and external audit quality on the performance of non-financial public limited companies listed on the National Stock Exchange 100.


Design/methodology/approach
One-way random effect panel data regression was applied to 74 non-financial firms in the Nifty 100 from 2014 until 2019. The overall audit committee index and external audit index were built based on the new Indian Companies Act, 2013 and on a review of the literature to capture the impact of the new Act on firm financial performance.


Findings
The outcome of the study revealed that there is lack of evidence to show that audit committee characteristics improve the performance of top Indian non-financial listed firms. However, external audit quality was found to have a significant positive impact on the financial performance of firms as measured by Tobin's Q, while firm size and leverage were found to have a significant impact on the financial performance of firms as measured by return on assets and return on equity.


Practical implications
This paper will be greatly beneficial for financial practitioners and policymakers because it provides practical suggestions and recommendations about the types of external audit that are indispensable for the overall effectiveness and performance of firms. The study findings may also aid strategic policy formulation and execution for better corporate governance practices for the purpose of profit and wealth maximisation.


Originality/value
To the best of the authors' knowledge, to date, no previous research has evaluated the effects of audit committee features and external audit quality on the financial performance of firms in India after the implementation of the new Companies Act, 2013. Hence, this study fills this void in the present literature by examining the overall features of the audit committee and external audit and their impact on firm performance in the setting of India.

Purpose
This paper aims to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) on sustainability disclosure (SD) from the perspectives of resource dependence, agency and stakeholder theories in the context of Jordan.


Design/methodology/approach
The analyses were based on 405 observations from non-financial firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange, spanning the period of 2014–2018. The CG that influences SD was examined using panel data regression models.


Findings
The results of the current study show a positive and significant relationship between the extent of SG and the audit committee and board of directors' effectiveness. In terms of ownership structure, both institutional and foreign ownerships yielded an insignificant relationship with the extent of SDs.


Practical implications
The analyses have implications for practitioners, policymakers, top management and corporate executives. Firms are encouraged to restructure their board of directors to enhance the effectiveness of the board to better monitor and support better SD.


Originality/value
To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the determinants of SD in Jordan firms. This paper adopted a newly developed global reporting initiative-based reporting index that identifies companies with good sustainability practices. This adds value to the existing sustainability literature.

AbstractThe present research endeavors to examine the moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between the tenure of the audit committee chair and the board of directors with sustainability disclosure. Data from 592 non‐financial firms listed on the ASE from 2014 to 2021 were analyzed. The findings indicated that a longer tenure of a board of directors leads to increased sustainability disclosure, and firm size positively moderates this relationship. Moreover, the research outcomes indicated that the audit committee chair tenure had a positive yet non‐significant correlation with sustainability disclosure, with no moderating effect of firm size on this relationship. This study provides valuable insights for stakeholders, including investors, managers, and regulators, particularly in developing economies, by demonstrating the influence of corporate governance (CG) on sustainable development. The examination of firm size as a moderating factor offers a unique contribution to the existing literature, thus providing a deeper understanding of the indirect impact of CG on sustainability reporting.

AbstractThis study aims to investigate the mediating role of sustainability disclosure in the relationship between board gender diversity and performance of the firm in the non‐financial listed on Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). Using data from Jordan listed firms in ASE for the period of 2014–2018, the direct effect between board gender diversity on firm performance was examined, and the indirect effect of the mediating role of sustainability disclosure was also tested. The findings showed that board gender diversity has a positive and significant effect on performance of the firm. Furthermore, the results showed that sustainability disclosure fully mediates the relationship between board gender diversity and the performance of the firm. This study contributes to the knowledge by examining the mediating role of the sustainability disclosure on the relationship between board diversity and firm performance. Integrating knowledge of gender, corporate governance and sustainability enrich the study of firm performance. Regulators, investors and managers should consider not only gender diversity as a key enabler of growth but also sustainability disclosure. By increasing the level of sustainability disclosure and having a sound governance system may improve firm performance which in turn attracts investors because sophisticated investors nowadays embed sustainability consideration into their strategies to generate positive outcomes. In addition, this study provides evidence on sustainability disclosure as a mediating variable on the relationship between board gender diversity and performance of the firm in the ASE which is one of the emerging markets.

Purpose
This study aims to examine the roles of perceived organisational support (POS), attitude and self-efficacy in understanding the external whistleblowing intentions among senior auditors through the lens of stimulus–organism–response theory.


Design/methodology/approach
This study uses data from 119 senior auditors in audit firms in Malaysia. POS is predicted to be a stimulus factor from the external environment that affects the attitude and self-efficacy (organism) of the auditors and reassures them to act to whistleblow (response).


Findings
POS has a significant impact on self-efficacy and on attitude. Self-efficacy is shown as a significant mediator between POS and external whistleblowing intentions, but there is no statistical support for self-efficacy having a mediating effect on the relationship between the attitude of senior auditors and external whistleblowing intentions.


Practical implications
The findings can assist accounting professional bodies in understanding the psychological behaviours of auditors that contribute to their intention to shine a light on wrongdoing in audit firms and in providing a better insight into the critical factors that could influence auditors to whistleblow.


Originality/value
This study is among the earliest to investigate the application of stimulus–organism–response theory in whistleblowing, and hence it illustrates how the theory can be applied in studies on the ethical behaviours of actors in professional careers. The findings shed light on the role of self-efficacy as a significant mediator between POS and external whistleblowing intentions.