Suchergebnisse
Filter
58 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
War unbound: Gaza, Ukraine, and the breakdown of international law
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review
ISSN: 2327-7793
World Affairs Online
Myths and Realities of Global Governance
In: Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Band 45, Heft 1
SSRN
Keeping the wrong secrets: how Washington misses the real security threat
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 101, Heft 1, S. 85-98
ISSN: 2327-7793
World Affairs Online
Reclaiming Congressional War Powers: Opening Statement
SSRN
Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe and Cargill, Inc. v. Doe: The Twists and Turns of the Alien Tort Statute
In: Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper Forthcoming
SSRN
Introductory Remarks by Oona Hathaway
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 115, S. 83-95
ISSN: 2169-1118
Hi, everyone. Welcome to the Annual Meeting for the American Society of International Law. Our panel today is on "Accomplice Accountability for Grave Violations of International Law." We have an amazing group with us to talk about these issues.
SSRN
A Comparative Foreign Relations Law Agenda: Opportunities and Challenges
In: Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 667
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
Remarks by Oona Hathaway
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 104, S. 311-313
ISSN: 2169-1118
Introductory Remarks
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 103, S. 413-414
ISSN: 2169-1118
Introduction
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 102, S. 61-62
ISSN: 2169-1118
Why do countries commit to human rights treaties?
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 51, Heft 4, S. 588-621
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
World Affairs Online
Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 51, Heft 4, S. 588-621
ISSN: 1552-8766
This article examines states' decisions to commit to human rights treaties. It argues that the effect of a treaty on a state—and hence the state's willingness to commit to it—is largely determined by the domestic enforcement of the treaty and the treaty's collateral consequences. These broad claims give rise to several specific predictions. For example, states with less democratic institutions will be no less likely to commit to human rights treaties if they have poor human rights records, because there is little prospect that the treaties will be enforced. Conversely, states with more democratic institutions will be less likely to commit to human rights treaties if they have poor human rights records—precisely because treaties are likely to lead to changes in behavior. These predictions are tested by examining the practices of more than 160 countries over several decades.