The Peacemaker's paradox: pursuing justice in the shadow of conflict
Cover -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Part I Peace and Justice in Perspective -- 1 The Problem -- Why This Book -- Two Core Questions -- Structure of the Book -- 2 The Peace and Justice Debate -- A Change Over Time -- Mediation -- Claims and Confusions -- Hints at a Solution: Colombia -- Conclusion -- 3 How Justice Is Negotiated at the Peace Table -- What's on the Table, and Why? -- Justice for the Past and the Future -- Why Do Warring Parties Sometimes Demand Justice? -- Negotiating Amnesty, Accountability, and Truth -- Interim Immunity Arrangements: Perpetrators at the Peace Table -- Debating the Parameters of Amnesty and Truth -- El Salvador (1992) -- Guatemala (1996) -- Sierra Leone (1999) -- Liberia (2003) -- Sudan (2005) -- Congo -- Nepal (2006) -- Agreeing to New Tribunals -- Uganda -- South Sudan -- Colombia -- Victim Reparations and Vetting -- Conclusion -- 4 After a Peace Agreement -- Do Trials Follow? -- Continued Negotiation of Justice, Long After a Peace Agreement -- South Africa -- Liberia -- Kenya -- Conclusion -- 5 The Impact of International Courts on Peace Negotiations -- Differing Perspectives -- Case Experience -- Liberia -- Uganda -- Former Yugoslavia -- Darfur, Sudan -- Libya -- Congo -- The Colombia Approach: Proactive vs. Reactive -- Conclusion -- 6 International Justice and Deterrence -- The Idea of Deterrence and Prevention -- Case Experience -- Congo -- Kenya -- Guinea -- Côte d'Ivoire -- Libya -- Other Accounts of Deterrence -- Afghanistan -- Mali -- Demobilization of Child Soldiers -- Elsewhere -- What Determines the Deterrent Effect of International Justice? -- Conclusion -- 7 A Prosecutor's Discretion in Contexts of Conflict -- Context and Choice -- The ICC Prosecutor's Posture Towards Peace -- Prosecutorial Discretion -- Timing -- Should an Arrest Warrant Be Public or Sealed?
