Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Routledge communication series
In: LEA's communication series
In: Journal of Public Affairs, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 391-393
In: Journal of public affairs, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 209-214
ISSN: 1479-1854
In: Journal of public affairs, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 206-208
ISSN: 1479-1854
In: The Wiley Blackwell-ICA international encyclopedias of communication
In: The international encyclopedia of strategic communication Volume 1
In: The Wiley Blackwell-ICA international encyclopedias of communication
In: The international encyclopedia of strategic communication Volume 3
In: Handbooks in communication and media
In: The Wiley Blackwell-ICA international encyclopedias of communication
In: The international encyclopedia of strategic communication Volume 2
In: Routledge Communication Series
Human Communication Theory and Research introduces students to the growing body of theory and research in communication, demonstrating the integration between the communication efforts of interpersonal, organizational, and mediated settings. This second edition builds from the foundation of the original volume to demonstrate the rich array of theories, theoretical connections, and research findings that drive the communication discipline. Robert L. Heath and Jennings Bryant have added a chapter on new communication technologies and have increased depth throughout the volume, particularl
In: Journal of black studies, Band 47, Heft 7, S. 635-658
ISSN: 1552-4566
Racial gerrymandering in the U.S. state of South Carolina offers a case study to take a unique look at political control, power management, and government communication from the critical perspective of hidden reward structures. These reward structures result from strategic messaging by which an elite's perspectives deliver to them power by marginalizing others and their perspectives. More specifically, we interrogate one dominant narrative advanced in the United States—American Exceptionalism—by highlighting the irony of how South Carolina elected officials use the 1965 Voting Rights Act to assure a Black Democratic member of the House of Representatives, but simultaneously by gerrymandering elected officials actually reduce the likelihood of a second Democratic representative of any race/ethnicity. Using the paradox of the positive as a critical political public relations framework, we highlight the ways that American Exceptionalism is used to impose control, a control that favors one voting perspective to the marginalization of others in U.S. Southern politics.