Domestic law in international investment arbitration
In: International economic law series
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International economic law series
In: International economic law series
Domestic law often plays an important role in investment treaty arbitration, but how it should be addressed is unclear. Drawing on case law, international law principles, and comparative analysis, this book sets out a framework for engaging with domestic law
In: European journal of international law, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 1171-1176
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: European Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 112, Heft 4, S. 658-706
ISSN: 2161-7953
AbstractAlongside now-controversial investment treaties, many states also maintain domestic investment statutes. Although these laws offer protections similar to investment treaties and are increasingly applied in investor-state arbitration, they have—unlike the treaties—attracted limited scholarly scrutiny. This article argues that investment statutes can plausibly be characterized either as unilateral acts in international law or as domestic law. The article examines the significant consequences that follow from these characterizations, providing the first comprehensive analysis of these hybrid statutes.
In: A revised version of this paper appears at (2016) 17 Melbourne Journal of International Law 349
SSRN
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 64, Heft 4, S. 905-933
ISSN: 1471-6895
AbstractThe UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts have appeared in a small but steady trickle of investment treaty arbitrations over the last decade. This article considers the use of the Principles by investment tribunals on questions of both domestic law and international law. It suggests that reference to the Principles can play an important legitimating role on questions of domestic law, but that this should not replace reference to the applicable law. On questions of international law, reference to the Principles may be justified by resort to the general principles of law. However, the article contends that there is only a limited role for the UNIDROIT Principles where the primary and secondary rules of investment protection are already found in treaties and custom. In addition, while general principles have historically been drawn from domestic private law, there is increasing recognition that general principles of public law are more relevant to investment arbitration. Given this, arbitrators resolving questions of international law must be cautious in references to the UNIDROIT Principles, a quintessentially private law instrument.
In: A revised version of this paper appears in (2015) 64 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 905
SSRN
In: A revised version of this paper appears in (2014) 5 Journal of International Dispute Settlement
SSRN
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 61, Heft 3, S. 641-663
ISSN: 1471-6895
AbstractAs scholars in the Global Administrative Law project have recognized, doctrines familiar from domestic administrative systems are beginning to appear, in nascent forms, in some areas of international law. This article makes a first attempt to examine the appearance of one such doctrine, the duty to give reasons for administrative decisions, in international case-law. The existence of and rationales for this duty have been contentious in many domestic jurisdictions. The article thus considers the extent to which these debates have been replicated amongst adjudicators at the international level. The focus is on cases in the areas of WTO law, investment law and human rights law. It is found that the case law is not yet extensive, and (perhaps as a result) that no coherent picture emerges. In contrast to domestic systems, the areas examined in international law demonstrate some agreement on the desirability of the duty. However, different international adjudicators have recognized different rationales for the duty, with only limited consensus even within each area of international law studied.
In: (2012) 61 ICLQ 641
SSRN
In: ICSID review: foreign investment law journal, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 478-491
ISSN: 2049-1999
In: (2017) 1 Indian Law Review 95
SSRN
In: Groningen Journal of International Law, Band 3, Heft 1
SSRN
In: The Journal of World Investment and Trade, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 307-319
SSRN