Suchergebnisse

Problem of setting. Public government – it political practice of power which is carried out within the limits of the constitutionally political system and has a direct influence on all industries of life of socium is important. An effective public management in Ukraine must provide the state of stability, implementation of social obligations the states, deserving a condition for realization of congratulatory, financial, spiritual and social necessities of citizens; but him high-quality indexes far imperfect and characterized the plural of problems. Recent research and publications analysis. The questions of modernization and reforms of the system of state administration, constructions of the legal, social state, social and political processes are actively probed in the scientific mind of Ukraine, by the necessity of achievement of balance between the vital necessities of societies and interests of the state. Quite a bit Ukrainian scientists were engaged in researches of these questions – V. Kostytsky, І. Kostytska, O. Koban, A. Kovalenko, O. Batanov, I. Reznik, G. Chapala, M. Pukhtinskiy et al. Paper objective – ground of position, that a public management in Ukraine, which is carried out by public organs, local self-government, political parties and groups of political influence, must correlate with public resonance, to support the legitimity and answer to the innovative tendencies.Paper main body. A management in the public sphere of the state is very difficult professional activity, and foresees state and legal responsibility and account of public interests and expectations. However, disfunctions and destructions of public management can draw social and political instability, cutback of economic activity or regress, even weakening of sovereignty of the state. The criteria of political modernization matter very much for modern Ukraine: capacity of the political system for perception of innovations and mobilization of resources of power, structural and functional perfection of institutes of policy, powerful ...

Problem of setting. In of the article first certain and analysed research narratives to the international conflict, which was folded in modern scientific discourse - civilization, universal, phenomenological, deterministic, rhythm of development, the world is politicians, judicial. There is an appropriate question in science: how in our time to perceive and explain the situation of international conflict - by global turbulence or destructions of the world system? Analysis of main researches. In political science tradition objectively there were different of international of the world. Narrative of «conflict of civilizations» (S. Hantington) takes a place from their global opposition in foreshortening of the historical differences, values and alternative ways of life. P. Sorokin and Q. Wright developed universal narrative of international conflicts, where attributed them to the class ofgeneral social. Other scientists (E. Luard, K. Levin, J. Rubin, D. Pruit, K. S. Kim, T. Shelling) formulated in in the second half of XX century deterministic, rhythm of development, the world is politicians, judicial narratives of conflicts on a world arena. Paper objective. Idea and purpose ofthe article: to generalize the picture ofinternational conflicts in phenomenological narrative (the essence, sources, varieties and strategies of decision), to expose objective connection of conflicts with destructions of the world system and processes of global turbulence. Paper main body. In the epoch of globalization the modern world tested cardinal changes, caused the contradictory tendencies of integration and differentiation of international processes of, which strengthens the conflict of relations. In these terms essence of international conflict is interpreted, as culmination of development of objective contradictions between the states (by the group of the states), the display of which is a collision on soil of opposite national interests, public aims and aspirations. The sources of origin and factors of determination of ...

After Japan's defeat in World War II, its political system underwent a gradual modernization from militarism to neoliberal democracy. Radical changes in the structure, functions and the nature of the country political system differed in special political and legal aspects: in the form of the government, parliamentarism, a party system, governance. During this period, Japan went from a bureaucratic authoritarian system to a modern, conciliatory political system.

Problem setting. The first decades o f the XXI century demonstrate the unrestrained, turbulent, even explosive development o f the world political process, which raised waves o f "color" revolutions, began to distort the national sovereignty o f some countries, led to a violation o f the international principle o f inviolability ofpostwar borders through military conflicts and "hybrid" wars. It is no longer possible to deny that under modern conditions there is not only a break in the bipolar and unipolar world order, but also a transition to a multipolar world with several centers o f influence. Recent research and publications analysis. Empirical approach plays important role in the study o f the international systems. It correlates with geopolitical specificity and mainly investigates contemporary interaction o f people and states, geopolitical strategies and government tactics within certain geographical regions. Empirical research is characterized by: the desire to specifically explain certain international situation (political, economic, humanitarian), that developed in certain region o f the planet, specificity o f the systemic connections between global actors; to highlight the level o f influence on behavior o f the international subjects and decisions o f national elites offollowing factors: sociohumanitarian and economic realities, national potential o f the states, cross-regional competition, directions o f actions and juridical boundaries regarding interventions o f international organizations etc. Serious destructive influence on the contemporary system o f international relations is exerted by new wars o f the 21st century: wars with terror, cyberwar, "hybrid" wars and so on.Paper objective. The purpose o f the article is to seek through systemic, phenomenological and factor-geopolitical analysis to identify the nature o f the modern international system and the nature o f real and hybrid "drivers" that stimulate its development and, at the same time, turbulence and global shifts. Hence, the ...

The article methodologically rethinks the heuristic ability of the classical imperatives of geopolitics in the analysis of the current international situation. A systematic streamlining of dominant trends (global, regional, temporal) in the changed geopolitical space is being carried out in terms of their scale, strength and prospects. Theoretically substantiated new definitions of phenomena – "geopolitical world order" and "geopolitical climate", which are formed and changed as a result of the actions of the dominant trends in world politics.

Problem of setting. Public government – it political practice of power which is carried out within the limits of the constitutionally political system and has a direct influence on all industries of life of socium is important. An effective public management in Ukraine must provide the state of stability, implementation of social obligations the states, deserving a condition for realization of congratulatory, financial, spiritual and social necessities of citizens; but him high-quality indexes far imperfect and characterized the plural of problems.
Recent research and publications analysis. The questions of modernization and reforms of the system of state administration, constructions of the legal, social state, social and political processes are actively probed in the scientific mind of Ukraine, by the necessity of achievement of balance between the vital necessities of societies and interests of the state. Quite a bit Ukrainian scientists were engaged in researches of these questions - V. Kostytsky, І. Kostytska, O. Koban, A. Kovalenko, O. Batanov, I. Reznik, G. Chapala, M. Pukhtinskiy et al.
Paper objective – ground of position, that a public management in Ukraine, which is carried out by public organs, local self-government, political parties and groups of political influence, must correlate with public resonance, to support the legitimity and answer to the innovative tendencies.
Paper main body. A management in the public sphere of the state is very difficult professional activity, and foresees state and legal responsibility and account of public interests and expectations. However, disfunctions and destructions of public management can draw social and political instability, cutback of economic activity or regress, even weakening of sovereignty of the state. The criteria of political modernization matter very much for modern Ukraine: capacity of the political system for perception of innovations and mobilization of resources of power, structural and functional perfection of institutes of policy, powerful «social elevators» for equal access of people to imperious positions, effectiveness of principle of «equality all before a law».
To Ukraine, as to the young state which passed by democratic transit, naturally peculiar strategy of reforms. Reformation is a not workaday situation for a country, it generates calls and problems. Among them most difficult is destructive of political power, what democratic development of country and becoming of civil institutes is braked through. Sociological researches rotined that a population considered: «The state must take more responsibility in providing of life of citizens» (68,6%). Stably negative is attitude of people toward a department judicial, which loses a «social capital» through inability to the just legal proceeding and mercenary political interests. In the end, unique reform 2014, that purchased positive social resonance is the process of decentralization the public power and strengthening of local self-government, which is mainly approved by citizens.
Conclusions of the research. Problems of public management and collision of reforms are the sign of modern democracies which are modernized. The political system and public management can be effectively modernized at the maintainance of their integrity, institutional memory and, at the same time, harmonious relationships with a social environment.

The article presents a number of fundamental basic attitudes of social science contained in its theoretical heritage. In particular, it expressed the position that the majority of classical sociological concepts in its grounds are: progressivistic, egalitarian, anti-consumer and rational. Author gives arguments justifying resonating each of these postulates with subjects of social reality. It is noted that the dissonance between eschatological expectations of renewed state of society and dramatic character of events can influence the nature of perception of educational material in the preparation of professional sociologists. In such a situation, there is still valid difficultly solvable dilemma relating to personal choice: whether to focus on the ethical «core» of sociology, as it is represented by the founders of sociology and current successors of their traditions, or actively explore the skills to take advantage of the interest of different social groups in the use of sociological tools for further development of consumer initiatives, as well as preserving and modifying the practice of social inequalities. ; В статье представлен ряд базисных установок социологической науки, содержащийся в ее теоретическом наследии. В частности, высказывается мысль, согласно которой большинство классических социологических концепций по своим основаниям являются прогрессистскими, эгалитаристскими, антипотребительскими и рационалистскими. Приводятся аргументы, обосновывающие несовпадение каждого из данных постулатов с социальной реальностью. Отмечается, что диссонанс между ожиданиями обновленного состояния общества и драматизмом событий, происходящих в современном обществе, может оказывать влияние на характер восприятия учебного материала в контексте подготовки профессиональных социологов. Подчеркивается, что в такой ситуации сохраняет актуальность сложная дилемма, касающаяся личностного выбора преподавателей социологии: ориентироваться на этическое «ядро» социологии, каким его представляли основатели социологической науки и нынешние продолжатели их традиций, либо активно осваивать навыки, позволяющие воспользоваться заинтересованностью различных социальных групп в применении социологического инструментария для дальнейшего развития общества потребления, а также сохранения и модификации практики социальных неравенств. ; У статті здійснений теоретичний аналіз найбільш значущих «моделей» демократії, які необхідно враховувати в процесі політичної модернізації України. У надскладних пост-революційних, воєнних умовах існує нагальна потреба у пошуку оптимальної, ефективної форми демократії та переоцінки траєкторії демократичного «дрейфу», що відбувається в умовах модернізації нашої країни. Процес «транзиту» України до демократії перш за все пов'язан з подоланням рудименту тоталітаризму й автократії. Проголошена сьогодні стратегія реформ фактично націлена на прогресивну модель європейської демократичної держави. Демократичні перетворення вже набули характеру закономірної тенденції, але їхнє протікання все ще залишається проблемним і кризовим, має соціально невпорядкований характер, поки що слабо керованим державними структурами. Тому «модель», що синтезує принципи неоліберальної, плюралістичної та соціальної демократії, може бути реалізована в Україні виключно шляхом збалансування і гармонізації розвитку об'єктивних та суб'єктивних чинників демократизації країни.

After Japan's defeat in World War II, its political system underwent a gradual modernization from militarism to neoliberal democracy. Radical changes in the structure, functions and the nature of the country political system differed in special political and legal aspects: in the form of the government, parliamentarism, a party system, governance. During this period, Japan went from a bureaucratic authoritarian system to a modern, conciliatory political system.

The article analyzes corruption as an extra-legal phenomenon that destroys the morality and values of society, threatens democracy and human rights, deforms the functions of state power, discrediting it both within the country and in the international arena. It is noted that the formation of dysfunctions in the sphere of public administration is not the main socio-political danger of corruption.The threat of "corrosion" and gradual destruction of social ties in the system of state regulation, public control and the functioning of social institutions is creating. The sociological and legal interpretation of corruption made it possible to study it as a trigger that weakens statehood, to reveal the social mechanism of the influence of corruption ties on state institutions, to assess the political, economic, legal, socio-structural and psychological factors of its spread. The authors characterize foreign and domestic "models" of corruption and ways of counteracting it from the standpoint of the ontological approach; she also has identified social markers that reflect its specificity in Ukraine; a real assessment of the degree of effectiveness of anti-corruption actions in Ukraine are presented; the expediency of analyzing corruption in the international aspect, especially the mechanisms, forms and methods of Ukrainian corruption spreading in the world corruption services and the penetration of transnational corruption into the Ukrainian political and economic space; it is also revealed the effect of the social mechanism of corruption in the structure of the state, as a result of which the process of state regulation loses its morality and social value. It is shown that the stable, actively "mutating", adaptive to the majority of social changes, the nature of corruption in Ukraine does not only forms and reproduces the tolerant attitude of government and a significant part of the public, but it also actively inhibits democratic transformations and deforms the public consciousness of Ukrainians. It is emphasized that "salus populi" is the most pragmatic option among the systemic models of fighting corruption (totalitarian, authoritarian, liberal).

This article reveals the nature of civil society as a result of the historical maturation of economic, social class, political and spiritual living conditions that promote free activities and realization of private interests of people, their natural rights and freedoms. It says that its purpose, principles and results of activity-oriented practices always liberal and democratic. Civil practice considered as systematic consistently reproducible action of various social actors in the public sphere, which is a form of realization of their interests and capable of positively and / or negatively affect the existing social and political institutions of society. Proved that structural factors that contribute to the formation of new practices of civic participation is to increase the educational level of the population; development of social communications; intensification of political dissent, involving citizens in social associations. The growth of community initiatives and new amateur practices is a real mechanism of social control over the activities of power. ; В статье раскрывается природа гражданского общества как результата исторического вызревания экономических, социально-классовых, политических, духовных условий жизни, способствующих свободной деятельности и реализации частных интересов людей, их естественных прав и свобод. Указывается, что его цель, принципы и результаты гражданских практик всегда либерально ориентированы и демократичны. Гражданские практики рассматриваются как систематические и постоянно воспроизводящиеся действия различных социальных субъектов в публичной сфере, которые выступают формой реализации их интересов и способны позитивно и/или негативно влиять на действующие социальные и политические институты общества. Доказывается, что структурными факторами, способствующими формированию новых практик гражданского участия, являются повышение образовательного уровня населения, развитие социальных коммуникаций, активизация политических протестных настроений, которые привлекают граждан в социальные объединения. Рост общественных инициатив и новых самодеятельных практик является реальным механизмом социального контроля деятельности власти. ; У статті розкривається природа громадянського суспільства як результату історичного визрівання економічних, соціально-класових, політичних, духовних умов життя, що сприяють вільній діяльності та реалізації приватних інтересів людей, їхніх природних прав і свобод. Зазначається, що його мета, принципи і результати громадських практик завжди ліберально орієнтовані та демократичні. Громадянські практики розглядаються як систематичні та постійно відтворювані дії різних соціальних суб'єктів у публічній сфері, які є формою реалізації їхніх інтересів і здатні позитивно та/або негативно впливати на чинні соціальні та політичні інститути суспільства. Доводиться, що структурними факторами, які сприяють формуванню новітніх практик громадянської участі, є підвищення освітнього рівня населення; розвиток суспільних комунікацій; активізація політичних протестних настроїв, що залучають громадян у соціальні об'єднання. Зростання громадських ініціатив і нових самодіяльних практик є реальним механізмом соціального контролю за діяльністю влади.

This article carries out the phenomenological research of the "international system" through methodological synthesis. Features and various types of this system are critically organized. The transitive type and character of the modern global system of "disbalance and mutual equilibriums" fluctuating within the vectors of unipolarity and multipolarity in the conditions of competition of centers of global influence with different capacities (the USA, the EU, China and Japan, the Russian Federation, the leaders of the Middle East) is substantiated. Article explores "geopolitical shifts" as factors that have created the global turbulence and macro fluctuations of the transitional international system. Hybrid wars became one of the most destabilizing factors of the contemporary international system, fostering its turbulence. The article proves that the hybrid war is a combination of the partisan and civil war, as well as rebellion and terrorism.