Staatsrecht
In: Boom basics
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Boom basics
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 221-224
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht Journal, Band 18, S. 3
SSRN
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 111-116
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 327-330
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 321-326
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 107-110
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 108-145
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 1-4
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 196-204
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 221-225
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Netherlands yearbook of international law: NYIL, Band 24, S. 139-182
ISSN: 1574-0951
In December 1978 the Dutch Government ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as well as its Optional Protocol, which contains the possibility for individuals to submit complaints to the Human Rights Committee. According to Article 49 ICCPR and Article 9 Optional Protocol both documents entered into force in the Netherlands three months later, on 11 March 1979. The ratification process of the ICCPR had taken so long (the ICCPR was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1966) because of the Dutch practice of eliminating, before the ratification of a treaty, any (possible) conflicts between national legislation and the treaty in question. This can be achieved, as has indeed been done, either by making the necessary and appropriate reservations, or by changing national law accordingly. It has always been the intention of the Dutch legislature that all foreseeable conflicts would have been eliminated by the time a treaty enters into force.
In: Heringa , A W & Nguyen , H-T 2020 , Obstacles to participation in elections and the exercise of voting rights, inside the E.U. vol. PE 658.593 , European Parliament , Brussels . https://doi.org/10.2861/716381
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament's Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the PETI Committee, addresses some major issues of obstacles to elections in general and of obstacles to participation inside the EU more specifically. This is done by focusing on Member States and examples with regard to municipal elections, and European elections, but also in general on de-facto access to the exercise of the right to vote. Various recommendations are formulated.
BASE
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 316-325
ISSN: 2399-5548