AGAINST THE AUTONOMY ARGUMENT FOR MANDATORY GMO LABELING
In: Public affairs quarterly: PAQ ; philosophical studies of public policy issues, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 85-118
ISSN: 2152-0542
Abstract
Many argue that consumers possess a "right to know" when products contain ingredients derived from genetically modified organisms, on the grounds that it would protect consumer autonomy. In this paper, I critically evaluate that claim. I begin by providing a version of the "consumer autonomy" argument, showing that its success relies on ambiguities in the notion of autonomy. I then distinguish four approaches to autonomy and articulate the circumstances under which they would support active disclosure of a product property. I argue that none of these conceptions would support active disclosure of the presence of ingredients derived from genetically modified organisms.