Two Varieties of “Better-For” Judgements
In: Harming Future Persons; International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, S. 249-263
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Harming Future Persons; International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, S. 249-263
In: Value inquiry book series. Values in bioethics
Preliminary Material -- BIOETHICS: WHAT LIES UNDER THE SURFACE? /Tuija Takala , Peter Herissone-Kelly and Søren Holm -- WHY "DEFINITIONS" MATTER IN DEFINING BIOETHICS? /Sirkku K. Hellsten -- ETHICS BEYOND APPLICATION /Sven Ove Hansson -- UTILITARIANISM AND LIBERALISM /Harry Lesser -- THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF BIOETHICAL PRINCIPLES /Veikko Launis -- THE METHOD OF WIDE REFLECTIVE EQUILIBRIUM IN BIOETHICS /Juha Räikkä -- BUT HOW COULD THEY KNOW? REFLECTIONS ON THE ROLE OF PHILOSOPHY AND PHILOSOPHERS IN MEDICAL ETHICS /Pekka Louhiala -- DOES NURSING ETHICS FIT IN WITH PHILOSOPHY AND BIOETHICS? /Leila Toiviainen -- DIGNITY: YET ANOTHER LOOK /Simon Woods -- AUTONOMY (AND A LITTLE BIT OF DIGNITY) IN BIOETHICS /Niall Scott -- CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: AN ETHICAL ANALYSIS /Michael Parker and Paolo Vineis -- JUSTICE OR SOLIDARITY? THINKING ABOUT NORDIC PRIORITIZATION IN THE LIGHT OF RAWLS /Vilhjálmur Árnason -- WILL YOU STILL NEED ME, WILL YOU STILL FEED ME, WHEN I'M 64? AN ETHICAL PROBLEM FOR THE MODERN, COSMOPOLITAN ACADEMIC /Søren Holm -- UNIVERSAL RAPID TESTING FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE IN AIRPORTS AND PLACES OF PUBLIC CONTACT: A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT ABOUT THE ETHICAL CHALLENGES /Margaret P. Battin , Charles B. Smith , Larry Reimer , Jay A. Jacobson and Leslie P. Francis -- PIGS AND PRINCIPLES: THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH /John Harris -- RESEARCH ETHICS: A DECENT PROPOSAL /Rosamond Rhodes -- PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DUTY TO LOVE ONE'S CHILDREN /Floora Ruokonen and Simo Vehmas -- THE MEANING OF SUFFERING: A CRITIQUE OF THE HÄYRY SYNDROME /Frank J. Leavitt -- IS IT IRRATIONAL TO HAVE CHILDREN? /Richard Ashcroft -- HUMAN REPRODUCTION: SELFISH AND IRRATIONAL BUT NOT IMMORAL /Rebecca Bennett -- GAMBLING, RISKS, AND REPRODUCTION: A REPLY TO MATTI HÄYRY /Tom Buller -- DO WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO MAKE SMARTER BABIES? /Lisa Bortolotti -- YOUTHFUL LOOKS —NO MATTER WHAT IT COSTS? /Heta Aleksandra Gylling -- NEW LIFE FORMS: MIN OR MAX CYBORGS? /Timo Airaksinen -- ABOUT THE AUTHORS AND EDITORS -- INDEX -- VIBS.
In: Value inquiry book series
In: Values in bioethics v. 186
Preliminary Material -- DEVELOPMENT, RESEARCH, AND VULNERABILITY -- NEW PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ETHICS /Solomon R. Benatar -- SOME CURRENT ISSUES IN THE ETHICS OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND THEIR BACKGROUND IN THE PROTECTION OF THE DIGNITY AND AUTONOMY OF THE VULNERABLE /Matti Häyry -- BIOETHICS AND BIOMEDICINE: DEVELOPING COUNTRIES' PERSPECTIVE /Florencia Luna -- BRAZILIAN RESEARCH ETHICS: A NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE AIMING TO BUILD A NEW CULTURE OF RESPECT /Leo Pessini and Leonard M. Martin -- WHO SETS THE AGENDA FOR HEALTH RESEARCH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? A CALL FOR MORE COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT /Angela Amondi Wasunna -- ETHICAL ASPECTS IN INTRODUCING GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PURPOSES /Darryl R. J. Macer -- THE ETHICAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH INTO RARE GENETIC DISORDERS /Michael Parker , Richard Ashcroft , Andrew Wilkie and Alastair Kent -- ONGOING AND EMERGING BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ISSUES AT THE BEGINNING OF LIFE: UNITED STATES PERSPECTIVES /Rosemarie Tong -- HUMAN STEM CELL RESEARCH AS A PROMISING HOPE FOR HUMANKIND: A CHRISTIAN ETHICAL CONTRIBUTION /Bart Hansen and Paul Schotsmans -- INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN BIOETHICS AND ETHICS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY /Boris G. Yudin -- INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND THE ETHICS OF RESEARCH: THE MORAL SIGNIFICANCE OF COMMUNICABILITY /Leslie P. Francis , Margaret P. Battin , Jeffrey R. Botkin , Jay A. Jacobson and Charles B. Smith -- IS THERE A DUTY TO SERVE AS RESEARCH SUBJECTS? /Leonardo D. de Castro -- VULNERABILITY IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS /Elma Lourdes Campos Pavone Zoboli -- THE NEW VULNERABILITIES RAISED BY BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH /Maria do Céu Patrão Neves -- HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD: ALTERNATIVES TO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH /Frank J. Leavitt -- ABOUT THE AUTHORS -- INDEX -- VIBS.
In: Value Inquiry Book Series 165
In: Brill Book Archive Part 1, ISBN: 9789004472495
This book explores the many connections that bioethical thinking has with social reality. Bioethics, if it is to be effective, must engage with and address the actualities of modern life: policies, regulations, markets, opinions, and technological advances. In these original contributions fifteen notable scholars working in the North West of England take on this challenge. The series Values in Bioethics makes available original philosophical books in all areas of bioethics, including medical and nursing ethics, health care ethics, research ethics, environmental ethics, and global bioethics
In: SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance
In: Springer eBook Collection
In: Springer eBooks
In: Religion and Philosophy
Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1. Ethics Dumping and the Need for a Global Code of Conduct -- Chapter 2. A Value-Based Global Code of Conduct to Counter Ethics Dumping -- Chapter 3. The Four Values Framework: Fairness, Respect, Care and Honesty -- Chapter 4. Respect and a Global Code of Conduct? -- Chapter 5. Exploitation Risks in Collaborative International Research -- Chapter 6. How the Global Code of Conduct Was Built -- Chapter 7. The San Code of Research Ethics -- Chapter 8. Good Practice to Counter Ethics Dumping -- Chapter 9. Towards Equitable Research Partnership -- Appendix
In: SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance
This open access book offers insights into the development of the ground-breaking Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings (GCC) and the San Code of Research Ethics. Using a new, intuitive moral framework predicated on fairness, respect, care and honesty, both codes target ethics dumping – the export of unethical research practices from a high-income setting to a lower- or middle-income setting. The book is a rich resource of information and argument for any research stakeholder who opposes double standards in research. It will be indispensable for applicants to European Union framework programmes, as the GCC is now a mandatory reference document for EU funding.
In: Values in Bioethics Ser v.214
ARGUMENTS AND ANALYSIS IN BIOETHICS -- CONTENTS -- Foreword -- Preface -- Introduction Arguing About Arguments, Analyzing Analysis -- 1. The Place of Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics -- 2. Bioethical Skepticism -- 3. Bioethical Methods -- 4. Concepts and Distinctions -- 5. General Approaches, Particular Issues -- 6. Perspectives on Well-Being -- 7. Contested Concepts -- 8. Pressing Onward -- ONE Global Bioethics and "Erroneous Reason": Fallacies Across the Borders -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Opposites Attract: For and Against X -- 3. Polarization Between the West and the Rest -- 4. Descriptive versus Prescriptive Reasoning in Bioethics -- 5. Rationalizing Hasty Generalizations -- 6. Life and Death in a Vacuum? Practical Context in Global Biomedical Ethics -- 7. Conclusion -- TWO Is Bioethics Only for the Rich and Powerful? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. A General Analysis of Coercion -- 3. Can Poverty Coerce? -- 4. Serial Coercion and Extreme Poverty -- 5. What Follows from a Denial of the Coercive Power of Poverty? -- 6. Can We Fall Back on Justice? -- 7. Is There any Hope for Bioethics? -- THREE Do We Need (Bio)Ethical Principles? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Alleged Importance of (Bio)Ethical Principles -- 3. Ethical Principles in Practice-The Case of Cloning -- 4. Pronouncements Against Cloning -- 5. Abstract Principles Cannot Direct Practice -- 6. Philosophical Work is Marginalized -- 7. To Die for Ideas… -- 8. Conclusion -- FOUR Bioethics and Stephen Toulmin's Argumentation Theory -- 1. Argumentation Theory -- 2. The Case -- 3. Argumentation Theory-Toulmin's Model -- 4. Applying Toulmin's Model-Particulars -- 5. Applying Toulmin's Model-Generics -- 6. Conclusion -- FIVE The Use of Examples in Bioethics -- 1. The Pedagogic Function of Examples -- 2. The Use of Counter-Examples -- 3. "What Would We Say If…" -- SIX Moral Intuitions in Bioethics