Suchergebnisse

El trabajo de la historiadora y archivista Victoria San Vicente Tello ha sido pilar no sólo para conocer el proceso de conformación del Centro de Información Gráfica en el Archivo General de la Nación, sino para comprender la evolución de esta dependencia desde los ochentas hasta nuestros días. Gracias a su capacidad organizativa logró conjuntar su pasión por la historia con la archivística. Su trabajo contribuyó a capacitar y profesionalizar al personal del AGN, en tanto se elaboraba la Guía General del Archivo General de la Nación, instrumento de consulta básica, donde logró unir esfuerzos para preservar la memoria documental del país.

-

<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; mso-fareast-language: ES; mso-ansi-language: ES-MX; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">La historiografía que, de manera sucinta, se presenta a continuación, pretende dejar en el lector una visión general de la trata de esclavos negros y su comercialización en el periodo comprendido entre la primera mitad del siglo XVI y la primera mitad del siglo XIX. Se incluye también una reseña de la importancia que tal actividad tuvo en el comercio interno que no siempre se abasteció de la introducción trasatlántica. Estos parámetros temporales sirven para indicar que dejo fuera de mis comentarios las actividades de esta naturaleza que se dieron a raíz de la liberalización del comercio mundial en el curso de la segunda mitad del siglo XVIII y especialmente aquel de los esclavos destinados a Cuba, Brasil y otros países del sur de la América continental. El énfasis está puesto, entonces, en el desarrollo del comercio y el debate del origen, la periodización y las cifras de esclavos introducidos en Nueva España que por supuesto están relacionados a la política y economía interna e internacional a las que la trata se hallaba indisolublemente vinculada.</span>

En cumplimiento a la normatividad sobre el acceso abierto de la investigación científica, esta obra se pone a disposición del público en su versión electrónica en el repositorio de la uaemex (http:// ri.uaemex.mx) para su uso en línea con fines académicos y no de lucro, por lo que se prohíbe la reproducción parcial o total, directa o indirecta del contenido de esta presentación impresa sin contar previamente con la autorización expresa y por escrito de GEMAporrúa, en términos de lo así previsto por la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor y, en su caso, por los tratados internacionales aplicables. ; Este libro aborda las relaciones de poder en distintos periodos de la historia de México. Además de un capítulo de síntesis y otros de carácter teórico, que evidencian su unidad, esta obra contiene seis estudios de caso. Los tres primeros se refieren a la Nueva España, el cuarto al siglo XIX y los dos últimos a la actualidad. Desde otro punto de vista, cinco analizan el acceso y el ejercicio del poder en colectividades políticamente dependientes, bien sean comunidades locales (repúblicas de españoles de la Nueva España, municipios del Estado de México en la actualidad ) bien sean organizaciones (las metas novohispanas y las asociaciones de migrantes mexiquenses en Estados Unidos). Estos cinco estudios de caso comparten el análisis de variables que permiten distinguir tanto democracia de autoritarismo, como distintos tipos de democracia en los diversos ámbitos analizados. El sexto se concentra en el fenómeno de la esclavitud en la Nueva España.

los textos que componen este libro están emparentados porque tienen como eje de sus preocupaciones la democracia, por ser reflexiones producidas por personas que viven en iberoamérica y por tener a esta región como el objeto principal de sus preocupaciones (cuestión, esta última, que se manifiesta incluso en los apartados de carácter teórico). aunque las ideologías de sus autores no son en absoluto idénticas, éstos comparten algunas valoraciones, lo que permite detectar una serie de similitudes (incluso podría plantearse cierta complementariedad entre algunos de sus planteamientos, aunque este ejercicio no deja de implicar riesgos).

International audience ; Europe accounts for around 20% of the global cereal production and is a net exporter of ca. 15% of that production. Increasing global demand for cereals justifies questions as to where and by how much Europe's production can be increased to meet future global market demands, and how much additional nitrogen (N) crops would require. The latter is important as environmental concern and legislation are equally important as production aims in Europe. Here, we used a country-by-country, bottom-up approach to establish statistical estimates of actual grain yield, and compare these to modelled estimates of potential yields for either irrigated or rainfed conditions. In this way, we identified the yield gaps and the opportunities for increased cereal production for wheat, barley and maize, which represent 90% of the cereals grown in Europe. The combined mean annual yield gap of wheat, barley, maize was 239 Mt, or 42% of the yield potential. The national yield gaps ranged between 10 and 70%, with small gaps in many north-western European countries, and large gaps in eastern and south-western Europe. Yield gaps for rainfed and irrigated maize were consistently lower than those of wheat and barley. If the yield gaps of maize, wheat and barley would be reduced from 42% to 20% of potential yields, this would increase annual cereal production by 128 Mt (39%). Potential for higher cereal production exists predominantly in Eastern Europe, and half of Europe's potential increase is located in Ukraine, Romania and Poland. Unlocking the identified potential for production growth requires a substantial increase of the crop N uptake of 4.8 Mt. Across Europe, the average N uptake gaps, to achieve 80% of the yield potential, were 87, 77 and 43 kg N ha(-1) for wheat, barley and maize, respectively. Emphasis on increasing the N use efficiency is necessary to minimize the need for additional N inputs. Whether yield gap reduction is desirable and feasible is a matter of balancing Europe's role in global food ...

International audience ; Europe accounts for around 20% of the global cereal production and is a net exporter of ca. 15% of that production. Increasing global demand for cereals justifies questions as to where and by how much Europe's production can be increased to meet future global market demands, and how much additional nitrogen (N) crops would require. The latter is important as environmental concern and legislation are equally important as production aims in Europe. Here, we used a country-by-country, bottom-up approach to establish statistical estimates of actual grain yield, and compare these to modelled estimates of potential yields for either irrigated or rainfed conditions. In this way, we identified the yield gaps and the opportunities for increased cereal production for wheat, barley and maize, which represent 90% of the cereals grown in Europe. The combined mean annual yield gap of wheat, barley, maize was 239 Mt, or 42% of the yield potential. The national yield gaps ranged between 10 and 70%, with small gaps in many north-western European countries, and large gaps in eastern and south-western Europe. Yield gaps for rainfed and irrigated maize were consistently lower than those of wheat and barley. If the yield gaps of maize, wheat and barley would be reduced from 42% to 20% of potential yields, this would increase annual cereal production by 128 Mt (39%). Potential for higher cereal production exists predominantly in Eastern Europe, and half of Europe's potential increase is located in Ukraine, Romania and Poland. Unlocking the identified potential for production growth requires a substantial increase of the crop N uptake of 4.8 Mt. Across Europe, the average N uptake gaps, to achieve 80% of the yield potential, were 87, 77 and 43 kg N ha(-1) for wheat, barley and maize, respectively. Emphasis on increasing the N use efficiency is necessary to minimize the need for additional N inputs. Whether yield gap reduction is desirable and feasible is a matter of balancing Europe's role in global food security, farm economic objectives and environmental targets.

Europe accounts for around 20% of the global cereal production and is a net exporter of ca. 15% of that production. Increasing global demand for cereals justifies questions as to where and by how much Europe's production can be increased to meet future global market demands, and how much additional nitrogen (N) crops would require. The latter is important as environmental concern and legislation are equally important as production aims in Europe. Here, we used a country-by-country, bottom-up approach to establish statistical estimates of actual grain yield, and compare these to modelled estimates of potential yields for either irrigated or rainfed conditions. In this way, we identified the yield gaps and the opportunities for increased cereal production for wheat, barley and maize, which represent 90% of the cereals grown in Europe. The combined mean annual yield gap of wheat, barley, maize was 239 Mt, or 42% of the yield potential. The national yield gaps ranged between 10 and 70%, with small gaps in many north-western European countries, and large gaps in eastern and south-western Europe. Yield gaps for rainfed and irrigated maize were consistently lower than those of wheat and barley. If the yield gaps of maize, wheat and barley would be reduced from 42% to 20% of potential yields, this would increase annual cereal production by 128 Mt (39%). Potential for higher cereal production exists predominantly in Eastern Europe, and half of Europe's potential increase is located in Ukraine, Romania and Poland. Unlocking the identified potential for production growth requires a substantial increase of the crop N uptake of 4.8 Mt. Across Europe, the average N uptake gaps, to achieve 80% of the yield potential, were 87, 77 and 43 kg N ha−1 for wheat, barley and maize, respectively. Emphasis on increasing the N use efficiency is necessary to minimize the need for additional N inputs. Whether yield gap reduction is desirable and feasible is a matter of balancing Europe's role in global food security, farm economic objectives and environmental targets. ; publishedVersion

peer-reviewed ; Europe accounts for around 20% of the global cereal production and is a net exporter of ca. 15% of that production. Increasing global demand for cereals justifies questions as to where and by how much Europe's production can be increased to meet future global market demands, and how much additional nitrogen (N) crops would require. The latter is important as environmental concern and legislation are equally important as production aims in Europe. Here, we used a country-by-country, bottom-up approach to establish statistical estimates of actual grain yield, and compare these to modelled estimates of potential yields for either irrigated or rainfed conditions. In this way, we identified the yield gaps and the opportunities for increased cereal production for wheat, barley and maize, which represent 90% of the cereals grown in Europe. The combined mean annual yield gap of wheat, barley, maize was 239 Mt, or 42% of the yield potential. The national yield gaps ranged between 10 and 70%, with small gaps in many north-western European countries, and large gaps in eastern and south-western Europe. Yield gaps for rainfed and irrigated maize were consistently lower than those of wheat and barley. If the yield gaps of maize, wheat and barley would be reduced from 42% to 20% of potential yields, this would increase annual cereal production by 128 Mt (39%). Potential for higher cereal production exists predominantly in Eastern Europe, and half of Europe's potential increase is located in Ukraine, Romania and Poland. Unlocking the identified potential for production growth requires a substantial increase of the crop N uptake of 4.8 Mt. Across Europe, the average N uptake gaps, to achieve 80% of the yield potential, were 87, 77 and 43 kg N ha−1 for wheat, barley and maize, respectively. Emphasis on increasing the N use efficiency is necessary to minimize the need for additional N inputs. Whether yield gap reduction is desirable and feasible is a matter of balancing Europe's role in global food security, farm economic objectives and environmental targets. ; We received financial contributions from the strategic investment funds (IPOP) of Wageningen University & Research, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, MACSUR under EU FACCE-JPI which was funded through several national contributions, and TempAg (http://tempag.net/).

Europe accounts for around 20% of the global cereal production and is a net exporter of ca. 15% of that production. Increasing global demand for cereals justifies questions as to where and by how much Europe's production can be increased to meet future global market demands, and how much additional nitrogen (N) crops would require. The latter is important as environmental concern and legislation are equally important as production aims in Europe. Here, we used a country-by-country, bottom-up approach to establish statistical estimates of actual grain yield, and compare these to modelled estimates of potential yields for either irrigated or rainfed conditions. In this way, we identified the yield gaps and the opportunities for increased cereal production for wheat, barley and maize, which represent 90% of the cereals grown in Europe. The combined mean annual yield gap of wheat, barley, maize was 239 Mt, or 42% of the yield potential. The national yield gaps ranged between 10 and 70%, with small gaps in many north-western European countries, and large gaps in eastern and south-western Europe. Yield gaps for rainfed and irrigated maize were consistently lower than those of wheat and barley. If the yield gaps of maize, wheat and barley would be reduced from 42% to 20% of potential yields, this would increase annual cereal production by 128 Mt (39%). Potential for higher cereal production exists predominantly in Eastern Europe, and half of Europe's potential increase is located in Ukraine, Romania and Poland. Unlocking the identified potential for production growth requires a substantial increase of the crop N uptake of 4.8 Mt. Across Europe, the average N uptake gaps, to achieve 80% of the yield potential, were 87, 77 and 43 kg N ha −1 for wheat, barley and maize, respectively. Emphasis on increasing the N use efficiency is necessary to minimize the need for additional N inputs. Whether yield gap reduction is desirable and feasible is a matter of balancing Europe's role in global food security, farm economic objectives and environmental targets.

Europe accounts for around 20% of the global cereal production and is a net exporter of ca. 15% of that production. Increasing global demand for cereals justifies questions as to where and by how much Europe's production can be increased to meet future global market demands, and how much additional nitrogen (N) crops would require. The latter is important as environmental concern and legislation are equally important as production aims in Europe. Here, we used a country-by-country, bottom-up approach to establish statistical estimates of actual grain yield, and compare these to modelled estimates of potential yields for either irrigated or rainfed conditions. In this way, we identified the yield gaps and the opportunities for increased cereal production for wheat, barley and maize, which represent 90% of the cereals grown in Europe. The combined mean annual yield gap of wheat, barley, maize was 239 Mt, or 42% of the yield potential. The national yield gaps ranged between 10 and 70%, with small gaps in many north-western European countries, and large gaps in eastern and south-western Europe. Yield gaps for rainfed and irrigated maize were consistently lower than those of wheat and barley. If the yield gaps of maize, wheat and barley would be reduced from 42% to 20% of potential yields, this would increase annual cereal production by 128 Mt (39%). Potential for higher cereal production exists predominantly in Eastern Europe, and half of Europe's potential increase is located in Ukraine, Romania and Poland. Unlocking the identified potential for production growth requires a substantial increase of the crop N uptake of 4.8 Mt. Across Europe, the average N uptake gaps, to achieve 80% of the yield potential, were 87, 77 and 43 kg N ha(-1) for wheat, barley and maize, respectively. Emphasis on increasing the N use efficiency is necessary to minimize the need for additional N inputs. Whether yield gap reduction is desirable and feasible is a matter of balancing Europe's role in global food security, farm economic objectives and environmental targets.

Esta Memoria del Tercer Simposium sobre Historia, Sociedad y Cultura de México y América Latina no sólo reúne 38 trabajos presentados durante el evento celebrado del 9 al 11 de octubre de 2007, sino que es constancia del interés de los investigadores y de las instituciones participantes por abordar temas que preocupan a la sociedad latinoamericana actual. ; El objetivo principal de este trabajo es doble. En el primer apartado, "Democracia y autoritarismo", se establecen y comentan sendas definiciones de democracia y autoritarismo que, en principio, se podrían aplicar a cualquier sistema político de la historia de la humanidad. En el segundo apartado, "Aspectos por considerar en estudios de caso sobre cualquier tipo de democracia", se mencionan algunos tópicos concretos involucrados en la concepción de democracia expuesta en el apartado anterior, con la finalidad de proporcionar elementos de análisis a quienes deseen aplicarlos a estudios de caso.