Exploring the Role and Value of Negative Emissions Technologies to the UK Energy System
In: 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Melbourne 21-26 October 2018 (GHGT-14)
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Melbourne 21-26 October 2018 (GHGT-14)
SSRN
Working paper
The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research.
BASE
In: Pfenninger , S , Hirth , L , Schlecht , I , Schmid , E , Wiese , F , Brown , T , Davis , C , Gidden , M , Heinrichs , H , Heuberger , C , Hilpert , S , Krien , U , Matke , C , Nebel , A , Morrison , R , Mueller , B , Plessmann , G , Reeg , M , Richstein , J C , Shivakumar , A , Staffell , I , Trondle , T & Wingenbach , C 2018 , ' Opening the black box of energy modelling : Strategies and lessons learned ' , Energy strategy reviews , vol. 19 , pp. 63-71 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002 ; ISSN:2211-467X
The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
BASE
The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research.
BASE
In: Pfenninger , S , Hirth , L , Schlecht , I , Schmid , E , Wiese , F , Brown , T , Davis , C , Gidden , M , Heinrichs , H , Heuberger , C , Hilpert , S , Krien , U , Matke , C , Nebel , A , Morrison , R , Müller , B , Pleßmann , G , Reeg , M , Richstein , J C , Shivakumar , A , Staffell , I , Tröndle , T & Wingenbach , C 2018 , ' Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned ' , Energy Strategy Reviews , vol. 19 , pp. 63-71 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002
The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research.
BASE
The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research.
BASE