Suchergebnisse

Purpose To describe patterns of menthol/non-menthol cigarettes with flavored e-cigarettes (tobacco, menthol, sweet/spicy, and other flavorings) use. Design We used cross-sectional data from the 2018-2019 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS). Setting United States. Subjects Adults over 18 years old. Sample A nationally representative sample (n = 135 329). Measures We generated a 15-category variable of all combinations of cigarette and e-cigarette flavoring use. Analysis We estimated population prevalence (PP) for the 15-category flavored cigarette and e-cigarette use variable and proportion of flavored cigarette and e-cigarette use among adults who used cigarettes or e-cigarettes (PAU) by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and income. Results Exclusive menthol cigarette use was higher among NH Black (PP = 8.79%, PAU = 68.96%) and low-income (PP = 4.86%, PAU = 29.09%) compared to NH White (PP = 2.63%, PAU = 18.83%) and high-income participants (PP = 1.25%, PAU = 19.02%). Exclusive sweet/spicy e-cigarette use (PP = 1.32%, PAU = 10.22%) and exclusive menthol e-cigarette use (PP = .95%, PAU = 7.40%) was higher in younger (18-34) vs older (35+) adults (PP = .34% and PAU = 2.76%, and PP = .14%, PAU = 1.11%, respectively). Older dual users tended to combine the same flavor in both products (eg, menthol cigarettes + menthol e-cigarettes), while younger adults were more likely to combine menthol and non-menthol cigarettes with sweet/spicy e-cigarettes. Conclusion Findings suggest that a menthol cigarette ban might be most effective in conjunction with sweet/spicy e-cigarette flavor restrictions, given these flavors are attractive for younger adults.

Purpose To examine trends in single, dual, and polytobacco use between 2014-2020 for US youth and to identify disparities in these trends by grade level, sex, and race/ethnicity. Design A secondary analysis of the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). Subjects A total of 122 566 students. Measures Past 30-day exclusive use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, other combustibles (cigars, little cigars, cigarillos, hookah, pipe tobacco, bidis) and smokeless tobacco (snus, smokeless, dissolvable); dual use of each product with e-cigarettes; polyuse with e-cigarettes; dual/polyuse without e-cigarettes. Analysis Multivariable modified Poisson regression. Results Compared to 2014, exclusive e-cigarette use (APR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.96, 3.21) trended upward while exclusive cigarette (APR = .34, 95% CI: .23, .50), 'other' combustibles (APR = .47, 95% CI: .37, .58), and smokeless tobacco (APR = .40, 95% CI: .25, .65) use trended downward in 2020. Polytobacco use with and without e-cigarettes trended downward in 2020 compared to 2014. We also saw differences in trends across sociodemographic groups. Comparing 2020 to 2014, exclusive e-cigarette use was higher for females than males, 'other' combustible tobacco use remained stable for Non-Hispanic Black students but decreased for other racial/ethnic groups, and dual e-cigarette/cigarette use trended upward more for middle school students than high school students. Conclusions Despite decreased trends in tobacco product use without e-cigarettes between 2014-2020, differences in tobacco product use trends by grade level, sex, and race/ethnicity were identified. Prevention efforts targeting disparities in tobacco product use are needed.

Purpose Examine trust in sources of COVID-19 information and vaccination status. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Chicago, Illinois. Subjects Convenience sample of 538 Black adults surveyed between September 2021 and March 2022. Measures Trust in sources of COVID-19 information, COVID-19 vaccination. Analysis Using latent class analysis, we identified classes of trust in sources of COVID-19 information. We considered predictors of class membership using multinomial logistic regression and examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between trust class membership and COVID-19 vaccination while accounting for uncertainty in class assignment. Results Our analytic sample (n = 522) was predominantly aged 18-34 (52%) and female (71%). Results suggested a four-class solution: (1) low trust, (2) high trust in all sources, (3) high trust in doctor and government, and (4) high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family. Unadjusted odds of vaccination were greater in the high trust in all sources (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), high trust in doctor and government (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), and high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family classes (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9) than the low trust class. However, these associations were not significant after adjustment for sociodemographic and health status factors. Conclusion Although COVID-19 vaccination varied across trust classes, our adjusted findings do not suggest a direct association between trust and vaccination, reflecting complexities in the vaccine decision-making process.

Purpose: To provide tobacco product use patterns for US adults by sociodemographic group. Design: A secondary analysis of Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (2014-15), National Health Interview Survey (2015), and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2015-16). Setting: United States. Sample: Three nationally representative samples of adults (N = 28,070-155,067). Measures: All possible combinations of cigarette, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), other combustible product, and smokeless tobacco use, defined as current use every day or some days. Analysis: Weighted population prevalence and proportion among tobacco users of exclusive, dual, and polyuse patterns by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and age. Results: Exclusive cigarette use was the most prevalent pattern (10.9-12.8% of US population). Dual and polyuse were less prevalent at the population level (2.6-5.2% and 0.3-1.3%, respectively) but represented 16.7-25.5% of product use among tobacco users. Cigarette plus ENDS use was similar by sex, but men were more likely to be dual users of cigarettes plus other combustibles or smokeless tobacco. Among race/ethnic subgroups, non-Hispanic (NH) Whites were most likely to use cigarettes plus ENDS, while NH Blacks were most likely to use cigarettes plus other combustibles. Dual and polyuse were generally less common among adults with higher education, income, and age. Conclusion: Differences in product use patterns by sociodemographic group likely represent different risk profiles with important implications for resulting health disparities.