Suchergebnisse

PurposeThis article focuses on children's social quality. Social quality can be understood as the extent to which people can engage in the social, economic, and cultural lives of their communities, under conditions that strengthen their well-being and potential. This article has two purposes. The first is to develop a league table ranking 23 countries' children's social quality based on comparative data. The second is to examine the correlation between these countries' commitment to promoting children's social quality and reducing the child care gap, where childcare is insufficiently covered by child care leave or Early Childhood Education and Care.Design/methodology/approachWe analyse the findings obtained from the children's social quality league table and the child care gap league table for the 23 countries.FindingsThe findings reveal mixed relationships between the children's social quality league table and the child care gap league table. These findings indicate that we cannot assume that countries prioritizing the reduction of the child care gap automatically possess the capacity or willingness to promote other aspects of children's welfare. They also highlight the significance of encouraging countries to enhance their children's social quality as a way to promote children's welfare rather than solely reducing the child care gap.Originality/valueChildren's social quality is a new research area. To explore it, this article makes an innovative attempt by exploring the connection between social quality, children's welfare, and the child care gap. The league table of children's social quality this article developed is the first of its kind.

This article builds a bridge between research on the queer economy and that on the mixed economy of welfare by developing the 'queer economy of welfare mix' framework. While the two fields are related, there is a lack of discussion about the queer dimensions of the mixed economy of welfare or the mixed strategies employed by lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals to explore the benefits and limitations of the queer economy. The purpose of our framework is to show how local and transnational goods provided by the mixed economy of welfare can enable LGBTQ+ individuals to organise their welfare through the mixed strategies – citizen strategy, consumer strategy, and consumer-citizen strategy. By examining Taiwan's legalised same-sex marriage and its impact on Hong Kong and Mainland China, we demonstrate the empirical significance of the framework, which serves as an analytical tool for examining the government's role in promoting LGBTQ+ individuals' welfare and the challenges involved.