Suchergebnisse

Machine generated contents note:There Is No Church in the Wild --Premise and Structure of This Book --pt. 1ELEMENTS OF AN IMPAIRED MISSIOLOGY --1.What Happened? Christianity and the Theological Turn of the Twentieth Century --White Supremacy of Missions --Emergence of a Post-Soul Context and Shifting Tide for the Church --Proofing and Chaplaincy Christianity --Western Confinement of Christianity --2.Missions, Race, and God: The Impairment of Short-Term Missions and White-Led Urban Ministries --Narrative and Voice of Young Adults --Multifaceted Inferences --Effects of Passive Racism --pt. 2CULTURAL EXEGESIS OF THE WILD --3.God in Hip Hop: A Conversation on Complexity --Field of Hip Hop Studies --Virtuous in the Paradox of Hip Hop's Theology --Hostility of the Gospel --4.Jesus of Hip Hop in the Wild: Race, Crisis, and the Pursuit of a Messiah --Race, Ethnicity, and Jesus --Jesuz in and of Hip Hop --Outlawz and Black Jesuz --Toward Contextualized Images of the Hip Hop Jesus --5.Vignettes of the Post-Soul Voice --Three Windows on Faith in the Wild/Post-Soul Context --Spiritual Taxonomies of Urban, Multiethnic, Post-Soul Young People --pt. 3CHURCH IN THE WILD: UNCONVENTIONAL MISSIOLOGY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY --6.Communal Connections in the Wild: From Short-Term Missions to Lifelong Relationships --Death to Short-Term Missions --Problems Associated with the Discourse of Missions --Lifelong Relationships: Beyond Reconciliation --7.Baptized in Dirty Water: Learning from the Post-Soul Missiologists Tupac Amaru Shakur and Kendrick Lamar --Situating Tupac in the Post-Soul Context --Kendrick Lamar in Post-Soul Conversation --Locating Tupac and Lamar's Missiological Gospel Essence --Toward a Missiology of Post-Soul Prophets --8.Beyond Reconciliation in the Wild: The Importance of Engagement with the Intricacies of Race and Ethnicities in Missions and Missiology --Death of and Movement Away from Respectability and Bootstrap Narratives --Death of and Movement Away from White Dominance in Missions --Nurturing Doubt and Ambiguity in Missiology --9.Theology for the Wild: Protest and Civil Disruption as Missiology --Reimagining King Nebuchadnezzar in the Context of Empire --Theological Paradigm of Violence and Civil Disruption --Final Reflections on a Missiology in the Wild for White Sisters and Brothers --10.Conclusions: Toward a Missiology of the Wild and the Secular, Sacred, and Profane.

Back in the day : tracing the social and theological origins of hip hop -- Hip hop & the post-soul matrix -- Pain, misery, hate & love all at once : a theology of suffering -- Where are my dawgs at? : a theology of community -- Jesuz is hip hop : a theology of the hip hop Jesuz -- Tupac's nit grit hood gospel : a theology of social action & justice -- Finding Jesus in the shadows : a theology of the profane -- The scandal of loving the ethnos : beginning the dialogue of hip hop missions -- See you at the crossroads : Jesuz, hip hop & missions in post-9/11 America

Bioeconomy is an emerging concept that is gaining momentum both in science and policy. Within the forest sector, the bioeconomy discourse is already shaping the international forest policy debate. Given the sector's importance for the national economy, this study investigates the perceptions of bioeconomy by forest owners, forest industry and ENGOs in Sweden. Drawing on cognitive and ideological dimensions of political bargaining, we analyse to which extent the bioeconomy serves as a bridging concept, a dividing concept or a boundary object. The results show that the bioeconomy is a broadly accepted concept, perceived as a natural extension of the Swedish forestry model. Results indicate that bioeconomy is well aligned with the key characteristics of a boundary object, that is, serving specific interests of different forest stakeholders under the generally accepted conceptual umbrella. We did not identify dividing effects of any substance. On the contrary, the interviews provide a strong indication that bioeconomy serves the Swedish forest sector as a bridging concept that brings closer rather than antagonises the different actors.