Suchergebnisse

This paper presents some initial lessons learned about the use of classroom observation data as a key form of evidence regarding improved teaching quality in a multi-year teacher development study series. This study series, commissioned by the Australian Government's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), involves the investigation of teacher development initiatives that are primarily designed to support the implementation of new primary curriculum in Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos), Timor-Leste and Vanuatu. The overall aim of the study series is to understand the extent to which the Australian investment has improved teaching quality and student learning. This paper discusses the processes used to design, implement, analyse and report classroom observation data in the Laos study, and key lessons learned about these that could be applied to other contexts and programs.

The Australian Government is supporting significant education reforms in Lao PDR. This policy note summarises baseline findings on primary school teacher practice and student learning outcomes, at a point just prior to major curriculum changes. Key findings include the need for intensive action on Lao language literacy, targeted teacher training on the new curriculum with a special emphasis on second language learners, and deepened engagement with school communities to reduce student absenteeism and improve student readiness for school. Part of a multi-year study series, the Education Analytics Service is investigating how the Basic Education Quality and Access in Laos program (BEQUAL) is making a difference to the Government of Laos' ongoing primary education reforms. The study series was commissioned by the Australian Government's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), to investigate teacher and learning development initiatives in three countries: Lao PDR, Timor-Leste and Vanuatu.

Thinking Maths is a three-term structured professional learning program for Years 6 - 9 mathematics teachers to engage middle school students' mathematics learning. The Thinking Maths program has been developed by the South Australian Department for Education based on its Teaching for Effective Learning (TfEL) Framework. The program aims to address a significant drop in students' mathematics performance in NAPLAN from Years 7 to Year 9. Thinking Maths supports teachers to improve students' learning of mathematical content during the transition between Primary and Secondary school. Years 6 - 9 teachers participate in five professional learning days at 4 - 5 week intervals over three school terms in an eight-month intervention period delivered and led by two facilitators from the Department. The evaluation of Thinking Maths was independently conducted by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) during February to October 2017. It involved over 7068 students (Years 5 - 10) in 158 government Primary and Secondary schools across South Australia. This efficacy evaluation was a multi-site, two-armed (intervention and business-as-usual control) Randomised Control Trial (RCT), with randomisation at the school level. The primary research question was to identify the impact of the Thinking Maths program on the mathematics achievement of individual students. This report presents the findings of the outcome and process evaluation of the Thinking Maths program evaluation.

Thinking Maths is a three-term structured professional learning program for Years 6 - 9 mathematics teachers to engage middle school students' mathematics learning. The Thinking Maths program has been developed by the South Australian Department for Education based on its Teaching for Effective Learning (TfEL) Framework. The program aims to address a significant drop in students' mathematics performance in NAPLAN from Years 7 to Year 9. Thinking Maths supports teachers to improve students' learning of mathematical content during the transition between Primary and Secondary school. Years 6 - 9 teachers participate in five professional learning days at 4 - 5 week intervals over three school terms in an eight-month intervention period delivered and led by two facilitators from the Department. The evaluation of Thinking Maths was independently conducted by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) during February to October 2017. It involved over 7068 students (Years 5 - 10) in 158 government Primary and Secondary schools across South Australia. This efficacy evaluation was a multi-site, two-armed (intervention and business-as-usual control) Randomised Control Trial (RCT), with randomisation at the school level. The primary research question was to identify the impact of the Thinking Maths program on the mathematics achievement of individual students. This addendum is a companion document to 'Thinking Maths: Learning Impact Fund Evaluation Report: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary'. The addendum contains: tables, figures, an overview of secondary outcome measures, HLM model specifications, an overview of process measures, the student survey, the teacher survey, a professional learning feedback form, and an overview of day 1 of the Thinking Maths Professional Learning Session.

This paper presents some initial lessons learned about the use of case studies as a key form of evidence regarding teaching quality and student learning in a multi-year teacher development study series. This study series, commissioned by the Australian Government's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), involves the investigation of teacher development initiatives in Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos), Timor-Leste and Vanuatu. The overall aim of the study series is to understand the extent to which the Australian investment has improved teaching quality and student learning. This paper discusses the processes used to design, implement, analyse and report case study data, and key lessons learned about these that could be applied to other contexts and programs. These processes include: design, implementation, and analysis and reporting.

This report constitutes the Baseline Report of the multi-year study of the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's (DFAT) investment in teacher development in Lao PDR through the Basic Education Quality and Access in Laos program (BEQUAL). This Lao PDR study is part of a three-country multi-year study series on teacher development, in response to DFAT's Office of Development Effectiveness' 2015 Investing in Teachers report. This study is framed within the context of Lao PDR's staged introduction of a new primary education curriculum, and accompanying in-service teacher professional development support. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the teacher professional development component to answer the question: to what extent does BEQUAL support improve teaching quality and student literacy in Lao PDR?

The Tasmanian Government is currently implementing significant reforms to improve students' retention and attainment in Tasmania's schools. There is a concern in the Tasmanian community however, that their students' performances are among the lowest in the nation. Reasons nominated for these results include weak literacy and numeracy levels; low attendance rates; high anxiety around transitions between Year 10 and Year 11 by some students, especially among those living outside of the larger cities; students seeking alternative education options; and family, financial, health and carer based issues. It is against this backdrop that the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) was commissioned to undertake an independent review of Years 9 to 12 concerning the following issues: student and workforce data; curriculum policy and provision (including vocational education and training (VET); and design and delivery for Years 9 to 12 (which includes the three Tasmanian education sectors: the Tasmanian Catholic Education Office (TCEO), Independent Schools Tasmania (IST) and the Department of Education (DoE)).

This evaluation compares evidence from the literature with Australia's experience in supporting teacher development in a range of developing countries. It uses case studies to good effect in explaining choices made, the extent to which expectations were or were not met, and the lessons for future Australian assistance for teacher development. The evaluation found mixed results. In cooperation with governments and other donors, Australia has made positive contributions, such as improving teacher frameworks and curriculums, and training teachers through a range of interventions. However, there is room to improve—for example, in enhancing policy, strengthening analysis and negotiating new investments—so teacher education and training will result in better teaching and learning in schools. A significant limitation, acknowledged in this evaluation report, is insufficient attention to measuring learning outcomes. Follow-on evaluations involving the Office of Development Effectiveness are expected to help fill this gap.